Democrat running for NJ governor wants to ban ICE agents from wearing masks. The core concept here is a straightforward one: a prominent Democrat, specifically Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who is running for New Jersey governor, is advocating for a ban on ICE agents wearing masks. The rationale behind this, as suggested by the comments, stems from a desire for transparency and accountability within law enforcement, particularly when it comes to federal agents.
This push to unmask ICE agents is being presented as a matter of principle, drawing parallels to the broader debate over masking during the COVID-19 pandemic. The underlying idea is that if law enforcement officers are exercising governmental power, including the authority to detain individuals, they should be identifiable and held accountable for their actions.… Continue reading
This development marks an unprecedented shift, with private funds supplementing the military’s traditional taxpayer-funded budget. The White House and Defense Department have deferred inquiries regarding the anonymous donor and potential foreign ties, leaving Congress in the dark. The situation mirrors the administration’s pattern of accepting private donations, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and possible foreign influence, especially given the Trump Organization’s expanding global business ventures. This raises questions about the legality of the donation, as it could come from a foreign entity seeking favor.
Read More
White House says no inflation data release likely next month, and the immediate thought that comes to mind is… well, it must be bad. Like, really bad. You know, we’ve seen this before, haven’t we? It’s a pattern. Don’t release the numbers, pretend everything’s fine, and hope the public doesn’t notice the ever-increasing prices at the grocery store or the gas pump. It’s the old “if you don’t test, you don’t get cases” strategy, repurposed for economic data. It’s almost comical in its audacity, but also deeply concerning. It’s like that quote, “We’re winning so hard we don’t have to tell you how hard we’re winning!… Continue reading
Reports indicate that Trump is attempting to suppress the release of images showcasing the demolition of a section of the White House, likely due to public backlash over the project. The planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom, complete with Trump’s signature gold decor, will replace critical areas of the East Wing, despite widespread opposition. Although the White House press secretary dismisses the criticism as “fake outrage,” the project’s funding, primarily from Trump’s wealthy associates, raises ethical concerns and potential for undue influence. This method of financing the demolition also contradicts Trump’s previous claims that taxpayer funds would not be used.
Read More
Major corporations from the tech, defense, and crypto industries, along with billionaire Trump supporters, are funding the construction of a new $300 million ballroom at the White House. This project, which began with the demolition of the East Wing, has raised concerns about transparency, with House Democrats rebuking the lack of public disclosure and proper consultation. Despite the demolition starting without prior announcement, President Trump claims the project is privately funded, yet he has contradicted his previous statements regarding its impact on the existing structure. Furthermore, the National Trust for Historic Preservation has stated that the project is legally required to undergo a public review process.
Read More
Despite previously vowing to leave it untouched, President Trump is demolishing the East Wing of the White House to make way for a new ballroom. Demolition began quickly, with plans not yet submitted to the overseeing federal agency. The project, estimated to cost $250 million, will be funded by private donations, including $22 million from YouTube, yet a complete donor list remains undisclosed. This decision has raised concerns among historic preservationists and one Republican senator, especially given the ongoing government shutdown and lack of transparency.
Read More
The author claims Democrats are the ones seeking transparency regarding the Epstein files, but Republicans are blocking their release. Evidence allegedly gathered does not implicate President Trump, and instead, points to closer ties between Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. House Speaker Mike Johnson has refused to swear in a representative who could provide a crucial vote for releasing the files. Furthermore, Trump’s allies are reportedly silencing fellow Republicans who support the petition.
Read More
The Pentagon is restricting nearly all Defense Department personnel from communicating with Congress or state lawmakers without prior approval from the agency’s legislative affairs office. The memo, signed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, aims to improve accuracy and responsiveness in communications, with the restriction applying to key figures like civilian leaders and combatant commanders. While a senior official claims the move is consistent with longstanding policy, another suggests it will centralize all communications, requiring even service legislative affairs staff to seek approval. This move follows prior efforts by Hegseth to control information flow and has been met with mixed reactions, with some seeing it as an overreach and others as a necessary measure for coordinated messaging.
Read More
Speaker Mike Johnson stated he would not prevent a vote on legislation to release the Jeffrey Epstein files, despite the House being in recess. This comes as a discharge petition, needing 218 signatures to trigger a vote, is one signature away from success. However, the House’s continued recess, caused by the government shutdown, has delayed the process, and Johnson has refused to swear in the last signatory. While Johnson claims a House committee’s investigation is sufficient, the vote on the Epstein files remains pending.
Read More
In a recent MSNBC interview, Congressman Eric Swalwell criticized Speaker Johnson for delaying the vote on releasing the Epstein files. Swalwell’s comments focused on Johnson’s refusal to swear in Democratic Congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva, a move that would have secured the 218th signature required to force a vote on the files. Swalwell accused Johnson of protecting individuals associated with the Epstein case by obstructing the release of this information. This delay has sparked controversy and raised questions about transparency.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker