DOJ Sues Six More States in Sweeping Push to Obtain Unredacted Voter Rolls is the headline, and it’s a stark one. The Justice Department, under a political environment, is moving aggressively to gain access to detailed voter information from several states. The implications of this are significant, stirring up concerns about privacy, the potential for political targeting, and the very foundation of how elections are conducted in the United States.
The DOJ’s interest in unredacted voter rolls is viewed with skepticism by many. There’s a prevailing sentiment that the federal government, specifically the DOJ in this climate, has no legitimate role to play in accessing such sensitive information.… Continue reading
India’s government has mandated that smartphone manufacturers preload a cyber safety app, Sanchar Saathi, onto all devices, a move intended to track and block stolen phones. While the telecom ministry frames this as a security measure, the directive has sparked privacy concerns and political opposition, with critics viewing it as potential government surveillance. Apple, however, plans to resist this mandate, citing privacy and security issues inherent to its iOS ecosystem and will communicate its concerns to New Delhi. Other manufacturers like Samsung are reviewing the order, which was implemented without industry consultation, while Apple faces an ongoing antitrust penalty dispute with an Indian watchdog.
Read More
In South Korea, four individuals have been arrested for hacking over 120,000 IP cameras in homes and businesses to create sexually exploitative content for an overseas website. The accused exploited vulnerabilities, such as weak passwords, to gain access to the cameras, which are commonly used for security and monitoring purposes. Police investigations revealed that the suspects operated independently, selling the illicitly obtained footage for virtual assets. Authorities are now working to shut down the website, collaborate with foreign agencies, and assist victims by notifying them, providing guidance, and helping to delete content.
Read More
Following the release of unredacted files by the House Oversight Committee, several Jeffrey Epstein survivors experienced significant distress and media attention, as outlined in a court filing this week. Lawyers representing hundreds of Epstein victims reported being contacted by survivors whose identities were exposed, expressing confusion and dismay over the lack of privacy protection. The lawyers specifically cited instances where the Department of Justice appeared to have failed to redact victims’ names in documents provided to the committee. Consequently, the judge ordered the DOJ to clarify its handling of the materials and detail its plan for protecting survivor privacy by December 1st.
Read More
The FBI spied on a private Signal group chat of immigrants’ rights activists who were organizing “courtwatch” efforts in New York City. Law enforcement records show the FBI gained access to a Signal group coordinating volunteers monitoring federal immigration court proceedings and labeled the court watchers as “anarchist violent extremist actors.” The FBI’s report, which did not clarify how they accessed the group or provide evidence of the “extremist” claims, was shared with other law enforcement agencies. Critics have condemned the surveillance, noting the non-violent nature of courtwatch efforts and likening the actions to past FBI overreach.
Read More
According to The Associated Press, the U.S. Border Patrol is operating a secretive surveillance program, monitoring millions of American drivers using license plate readers and predictive intelligence. This program analyzes travel patterns to identify and detain individuals deemed suspicious, often leading to aggressive questioning and searches based on pretextual traffic stops. The Border Patrol has expanded its reach beyond the border, collaborating with other agencies and utilizing AI, creating a mass surveillance network impacting people throughout the country. Civil liberties advocates raise concerns about the constitutionality of this program and its potential for abuse, as exemplified by cases where individuals were stopped and searched with no evidence of wrongdoing.
Read More
Judge denies request to exempt Flock footage from Public Records Act, and this ruling, frankly, feels like a necessary dose of reality in a world where surveillance seems to be quietly creeping into every corner. The implications of this decision are far-reaching, and it’s about time someone brought the hammer down on the blurring lines between public and private when it comes to who’s watching us.
The initial argument, as I understand it, centered on the idea that since these cameras are in public spaces, people have no expectation of privacy. Therefore, the footage they capture should be considered fair game.… Continue reading
During a Senate Commerce Committee hearing, Senator Bernie Moreno admitted to obtaining the VINs of his Democratic colleagues’ vehicles, sparking immediate condemnation. Moreno argued that this revealed a lack of investment in additional safety technology, undermining their push for mandates. Democratic Senator Jacky Rosen accused Moreno of stalking and invading her and her staff’s privacy, leading to a heated exchange. The incident underscored broader political tensions and was further highlighted by the context of a government shutdown and a lavish party held by former President Trump.
Read More
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents are using facial recognition software to determine immigration status, even on U.S. citizens, without consent. This technology, such as the app Mobile Fortify, scans faces in public, comparing them against databases and potentially overriding official documentation. Internal documents show that the data collected, including images of U.S. citizens, is stored for years. Furthermore, officials have been known to trust the app’s results over a person’s government documents.
Read More
Google followed Apple’s lead by removing apps from its online store that facilitated anonymous reporting of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Apple’s decision, prompted by Attorney General Pam Bondi, cited safety risks associated with apps like ICEBlock that tracked law enforcement. The removal followed a shooting at a Dallas ICE facility where the attacker had researched apps for tracking ICE agents, resulting in fatalities. Both companies prioritized user safety and the protection of law enforcement in their decisions.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker
ICE’s Facial Recognition App Scans US Citizens, Ignores Proof of Citizenship
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents are using facial recognition software to determine immigration status, even on U.S. citizens, without consent. This technology, such as the app Mobile Fortify, scans faces in public, comparing them against databases and potentially overriding official documentation. Internal documents show that the data collected, including images of U.S. citizens, is stored for years. Furthermore, officials have been known to trust the app’s results over a person’s government documents.
Read More