AI in hiring

Meta Accused of AI-Driven Layoffs Targeting Workers With Medical Conditions

Meta Platforms is facing a federal lawsuit from 26 current and former employees who allege that the company utilized AI-assisted tools during layoffs, resulting in discrimination against workers with medical conditions, disabilities, or those on protected leave. The lawsuit claims that AI-driven productivity metrics and analytics failed to account for legally protected leave, leading to discriminatory employment decisions, though Meta strongly denies these allegations, asserting that human managers solely made the layoff decisions and that AI was not used for termination determinations. This case represents a significant legal challenge regarding the use of AI in employment decisions and its potential impact on existing anti-discrimination laws.

Read More

AI Ghosting Job Seekers Reaches Three-Year High Amidst Market Frustration

It seems job seekers are absolutely right to feel like they’re being left in the dark; the number of candidates experiencing the disheartening phenomenon of being ghosted by employers has just hit a three-year high, and a significant culprit appears to be the pervasive integration of artificial intelligence into hiring processes.

The frustration stems from a palpable disconnect between the advertised need for talent and the actual hiring outcomes. Many candidates, armed with experience, degrees, and certifications, find themselves navigating a labyrinth of automated applications and AI-powered screening, only to receive crickets or, at best, generic automated rejections. It’s a process that feels less about finding the right fit and more about ticking boxes for algorithms, leaving individuals questioning the legitimacy of many “urgently hiring” postings.… Continue reading