AI Fair Use

Meta Wins Copyright Lawsuit, But Ruling Doesn’t Guarantee AI Training Legality

In a recent legal victory for Meta, a judge ruled in favor of the company in a copyright lawsuit filed by authors who alleged their works were used without permission to train Meta’s AI system. The judge determined that the authors failed to provide sufficient evidence of market harm caused by Meta’s AI, classifying the use of copyrighted material as “fair use”. This ruling follows a similar decision in favor of Anthropic, another AI company, though the judge acknowledged the complexities of the copyright issues surrounding AI training. Furthermore, the judge expressed sympathy for the authors’ argument that AI models may undermine the market for creative works.

Read More

Trump Fires Copyright Chief After AI Fair Use Report

Register of Copyrights Shira Perlmutter was reportedly fired from her position following the release of a report on the fair use of copyrighted data for AI training. The report concluded that while some AI uses, like research, might qualify as fair use, commercial applications that compete with existing markets likely do not. This firing has been criticized as an “unprecedented power grab” possibly linked to the report’s unfavorable implications for AI companies. Simultaneously, Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden was also dismissed, although the White House cited unrelated reasons.

Read More