A federal judge’s ruling deemed the Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) mass firing of probationary federal employees unlawful, citing a lack of statutory authority. This decision prompted several agencies to reinstate critical personnel, including specialists in areas like avian flu and nuclear weapons. Despite this partial reversal, the threat of broader, “large-scale” federal job cuts remains. The situation highlights the ongoing instability and uncertainty faced by federal workers.
Read More
Following a controversial initial request for weekly work summaries from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), federal agencies, including DHS, Energy, and Treasury, sent similar emails instructing employees to submit five bullet points detailing their accomplishments. Unlike the first email, this iteration allowed employees handling sensitive information to opt out or state that their work was confidential. OPM advised agencies to independently manage the requests, granting them discretion over participation, which was part of a broader strategy to track employee work. This new directive follows President Trump’s efforts to streamline the federal government, which have faced legal challenges and widespread disruption.
Read More
A California federal judge ruled that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) illegally ordered the firing of thousands of probationary federal employees, lacking the statutory authority to do so. The judge deemed OPM’s claim that the terminations were performance-based to be false and ordered the agency to rescind its directive. While the ruling prevents several specified agencies from conducting the OPM-ordered layoffs, it does not guarantee reinstatement for fired employees, nor does it halt all planned terminations. The judge’s decision was welcomed by labor unions as a crucial first step in protecting federal workers from what they described as baseless terminations driven by an anti-union agenda.
Read More
A federal judge ruled that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) unlawfully ordered the mass firing of thousands of probationary federal employees, granting temporary relief to a coalition of labor unions and organizations. The judge determined OPM lacks the authority to dismiss employees outside its own agency, contradicting the government’s claim that it only requested agencies review probationary employees. While this doesn’t guarantee rehiring of those already dismissed, it prevents future firings based on the OPM’s directive and requires the acting head of OPM to testify. The judge emphasized the importance of probationary employees to government function, highlighting the potential disruption to services resulting from these firings.
Read More
A lawsuit, updated following Elon Musk’s threatening email and X post, alleges that his demand for all federal employees to submit reports is unprecedented and constitutes massive employment fraud. Musk’s instructions were disseminated via an OPM email address established by his Department of Government Efficiency initiative, despite several agencies advising employees to ignore the request. The lawsuit highlights the absurdity of the mandate and its potential for widespread, unlawful terminations. Musk further escalated threats on X, prompting a deluge of satirical responses to the HR email address.
Read More
Federal employee unions have sued Elon Musk and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) over an email demanding all federal workers justify their jobs within a short timeframe or face termination. The lawsuit alleges this action violates federal workforce laws and exceeds OPM’s authority. Conflicting guidance from various agencies, including some Trump appointees instructing staff *not* to respond, further fueled confusion and worker anxieties. This latest action is part of a broader effort by Musk, under President Trump’s direction, to drastically reduce the federal workforce, leading to widespread criticism and legal challenges.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard instructed intelligence community personnel to disregard an email from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) demanding a list of five accomplishments from the previous week. This directive, echoed by other national security leaders, cited concerns about classified information and the potential compromise of national security. The OPM email, a tactic previously used by Elon Musk at Twitter, raised legal questions and confusion across various government departments, with some agencies directing employees to respond while others prohibited it. The conflicting orders highlighted the uncertainty and potential risks associated with Musk’s request.
Read More
Following President Trump’s urging for more aggressive action, Elon Musk initiated a sweeping measure targeting federal employees. An email, seemingly originating from the Office of Personnel Management, demanded a list of accomplishments from the previous week, threatening resignation for non-compliance by a Monday deadline. This action, coupled with prior controversial administrative orders, has sparked widespread anxiety and uncertainty within the federal workforce. Union leaders strongly condemned the move, vowing legal action against potential unlawful terminations. The legality of Musk’s actions remains unclear.
Read More
CNN’s Freedom of Information Act request to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regarding Elon Musk and associates’ security clearances received a dismissive response, citing the recent firing of the entire OPM privacy team. This action, mirroring Musk’s past firings at Twitter, limits public access to government records related to these clearances. The firings also included communications staff and FOIA request handlers, hindering transparency efforts. This follows OPM’s controversial “Fork in the Road” memo, echoing a similar communication from Musk.
Read More
Senior Democrats are demanding an investigation into potential national security breaches stemming from Elon Musk’s “Doge” team’s unauthorized access to federal agency systems, including the OPM, Treasury, and USAID. Concerns focus on illegal access to classified information and sensitive personal data, with a lack of proper vetting for Musk’s operatives. A federal judge recently limited Doge’s access to the Treasury’s payment system following lawsuits alleging privacy violations. Growing bipartisan unease is evident, with even some Republicans expressing concern over Musk’s actions and influence.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker