E. Jean Carroll has successfully collected over $5.6 million awarded by a jury in her sexual abuse and defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump. This payment, which includes the $5 million award plus interest, was released from an escrow account after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the civil verdict to stand. Despite Trump’s lawyers’ continued appeals and attempts to block the payment, Carroll’s legal team confirmed the funds have been received.
Read More
Writer E. Jean Carroll has received over $5.6 million in damages and interest following a federal jury’s verdict finding former President Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation. This payment comes after a judge rejected Trump’s attempts to delay disbursement and an appeals court denied his request to block the collection. The funds represent the $5 million awarded in May 2023, plus accrued post-judgment interest. Trump continues to deny Carroll’s claims and is pursuing further appeals regarding the civil defamation verdict.
Read More
A federal judge has ruled that E. Jean Carroll can collect $5.8 million held in escrow from a jury’s 2023 civil verdict that found President Donald Trump sexually abused and defamed her. Trump’s legal team is appealing this decision, seeking to halt the payment, though the president has already deposited the funds. This ruling follows the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to let the initial verdict stand, allowing the award, which has grown with interest, to be disbursed. The jury had determined Trump sexually assaulted Carroll in 1996 and subsequently defamed her when she publicly recounted the incident in her memoir.
Read More
Following the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear an appeal, Donald Trump’s legal team has requested an extension to pay a $5 million civil judgment awarded to E. Jean Carroll. Attorneys cite the need for new lead counsel, Josh Halpern, to become fully acquainted with the case’s complexities as the reason for the delay. The request aims to postpone a response to Carroll’s demand for payment, with Trump’s lawyers asserting that the funds are secured and no material harm will befall the plaintiff. Carroll’s counsel, however, views this as a further attempt to delay payment, noting that Trump has had ample time to secure new representation.
Read More
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear President Donald Trump’s appeal of a $5 million verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, leaving the judgment in place. This decision follows a jury’s finding that Trump sexually assaulted Carroll in 1996 and a subsequent jury’s awarding her an additional $83.3 million for defamation. Trump expressed surprise and vowed to continue fighting what he called a “Weaponization and Lawfare Case.” Carroll’s attorney stated that this ruling affirms the jury’s verdict and ends Trump’s efforts to avoid accountability.
Read More
Elon Musk threatened legal action against Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, accusing him of defamation for suggesting Musk’s oversight of funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) could lead to millions of child deaths. Khanna cited a study estimating over 4.5 million children could die by 2030 without USAID resources, a claim Musk vehemently denied, calling it a lie and accusing Khanna of insider trading. Musk asserted the cuts were due to a new rule requiring confirmation of legitimate fund usage, citing instances of bribery and fraud within USAID.
Read More
Donald Trump’s legal team has refiled a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and its parent company, Dow Jones, following the dismissal of their initial case. The suit centers on a Journal story alleging Trump sent a “bawdy” letter to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003, which Trump’s team contends does not exist. The refiled complaint asserts the Journal published the story despite knowing it was false or with reckless disregard for the truth. The legal team maintains that the Journal deliberately omitted key information, including Trump’s denial and a lack of corroboration from other individuals.
Read More
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar have announced plans to sue The New York Times for defamation following the publication of an essay detailing allegations of sexual abuse and rape of Palestinians in Israeli military detention. Israel’s foreign ministry characterized the essay by Nicholas Kristof as a “hideous and distorted lie” and a “blood libel” perpetuated against the nation’s soldiers. While The New York Times has defended Kristof’s reporting, citing extensive fact-checking and corroboration, legal experts express doubt about the viability of such a lawsuit, particularly in U.S. courts which are generally protected by the First Amendment against government-initiated defamation claims. This marks not the first instance of Israeli officials threatening legal action against the Times over its coverage.
Read More
Acclaimed Canadian musician Ashley MacIsaac is pursuing a $1.5 million civil lawsuit against Google, alleging defamation by the company’s AI-generated summaries. The lawsuit claims Google falsely identified MacIsaac as a convicted sex offender and listed him on a national sex offender registry. This misinformation led to the cancellation of a concert and has caused significant damage to his reputation and livelihood. MacIsaac’s suit contends Google is liable for the “foreseeable republication” of these defamatory claims, arguing the company knew or should have known its AI features were imperfect.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker