Companies will use tariffs as an excuse for price gouging, a strategy that has already been employed during past economic upheavals. This isn’t merely speculation; history demonstrates a pattern where increased costs, regardless of origin, are frequently passed on to consumers with little to no reduction when the initial cost increase subsides. The simple fact is that prices rarely decrease, even when the underlying justification for the increase disappears. Profitability remains the driving force, and companies will almost always seize any opportunity to maximize their margins.
This behavior isn’t limited to specific industries; it’s a broad trend across the economy. The cost of everyday goods, from groceries to household items, is often increased and rarely decreases even after the initial justification—like tariffs or supply chain disruptions—is no longer relevant.… Continue reading
President Trump’s announcement of a 125% tariff increase on Chinese goods and a temporary 10% reduction for other nations has sparked widespread criticism. This action, predicted by some, follows Trump’s long-standing advocacy for protectionist trade policies, including proposals made during his 2024 campaign. Claims that this drastic tariff increase is unexpected are refuted by Trump’s consistent campaign rhetoric and previous actions. The current economic crisis is thus not a surprise, but rather a foreseeable consequence of Trump’s stated policy goals, intensified in his second term by decreased political constraints and heightened loyalty from within the Republican party.
Read More
While President Trump claims foreign leaders are desperately seeking deals and “kissing his ass,” a Politico report contradicts this, revealing that several countries, including the Philippines and the U.K., have been unable to reach the administration for discussions regarding tariffs. Despite these claims of unreturned communication, Press Secretary Leavitt insists that the administration is receiving numerous calls. This discrepancy highlights a significant communication breakdown between the Trump administration and other world leaders.
Read More
President Trump’s imposition of tariffs has negatively impacted the stock market and global trade, yet he spent the weekend golfing while the economy falters. This behavior contrasts sharply with the hypothetical scenario of a Democratic president enacting similar policies, which would undoubtedly result in immediate calls for impeachment and widespread condemnation from Republicans. The article highlights the blatant hypocrisy of Republicans who remain silent despite the economic turmoil caused by Trump’s actions. This silence is contrasted with the fervent outrage that would likely ensue if a Democrat were responsible for comparable economic damage. Ultimately, the author urges Republicans to acknowledge their hypocrisy.
Read More
The EU’s decision to impose 25% tariffs on certain US goods is a significant escalation in the ongoing trade dispute between the two economic giants. This isn’t a blanket tariff affecting all US imports; instead, it specifically targets selected products, estimated to be worth around $22 billion. The move is a direct response to the US tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum back in March, not the subsequent broader tariff actions.
This situation feels like a high-stakes game of chicken. The US, under its current leadership, seems to be aggressively pursuing its trade agenda, much like a powerful vehicle speeding toward its opponents, daring them to yield.… Continue reading
The recent imposition of tariffs on imports from approximately 90 countries, including a significant increase on goods from China, is severely impacting small businesses. One Reddit thread highlights the struggles of small business owners selling imported goods, with some facing potential closure due to increased costs. A 34 percent reciprocal tariff from China, coupled with existing tariffs, is further exacerbating the situation. The resulting supply chain disruptions, as evidenced by a distributor withdrawing from the U.S. market, are creating significant challenges for businesses unprepared for such drastic changes.
Read More
In response to the U.S.’s latest tariff increase on Chinese goods exceeding 100%, China has raised tariffs on U.S. goods to 84%, effective April 10th. This escalation follows a pattern of tit-for-tat tariff hikes, threatening to severely disrupt trade between the two nations, given the substantial volume of bilateral trade in 2024. The conflict has already triggered global market instability, with major indices experiencing significant declines. U.S. officials have criticized China’s unwillingness to negotiate, attributing it to unfair trade practices.
Read More
In response to questions about contradictory statements on tariffs within his administration, President Trump asserted that both permanent tariffs and ongoing negotiations could simultaneously exist. He further explained this by referencing a need for “open borders,” a statement seemingly at odds with his prior anti-immigration rhetoric. The meaning of “open borders” in this context remains unclear, potentially referring to trade or representing a verbal inconsistency. This ambiguity reflects the erratic and often contradictory nature of Trump’s tariff policies.
Read More
The EU proposed a “zero-for-zero” tariff deal on cars and industrial goods to the US weeks before the trade war began, but this offer was rejected by Trump. Despite this, the EU remains open to negotiations but will not wait indefinitely to implement retaliatory measures against the US tariffs on steel and aluminum, targeting up to €26 billion in US goods. Disagreements among EU member states exist regarding the scope of retaliation, with some advocating for exemptions while others emphasize a united front. The EU is prepared to utilize its anti-coercion instrument if necessary to defend its interests.
Read More
Despite initiating trade talks with South Korea, Japan, and Italy, the U.S. implemented 104% tariffs on Chinese imports, as planned. These tariffs, along with others reaching 50% on various countries, are causing market volatility and economic concerns. The administration prioritized negotiations with allies over China, rejecting near-term exemptions. Consequently, businesses are already raising prices and consumers are stockpiling goods in anticipation of further inflation.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker