The White House’s characterization of Amazon’s decision to transparently display tariff-related price increases as a “hostile act” is, frankly, baffling. The administration’s reaction seems disproportionate and reveals a discomfort with straightforward accountability. It suggests a preference for obfuscation over transparency, a strategy that ultimately undermines public trust.
This labeling of price transparency as a hostile act raises serious questions about the administration’s priorities. Is the goal to keep consumers unaware of the true cost of goods, potentially masking the economic impact of tariffs? This approach seems designed to shield the administration from criticism, preventing the public from directly connecting the tariffs to increased prices.… Continue reading
Amazon briefly considered adding import charges to its ultra-low-cost Haul platform, but ultimately decided against it. This decision followed a news report suggesting Amazon would display tariffs, prompting a negative White House reaction and a personal call from President Trump to Jeff Bezos. The White House’s criticism stemmed from the timing of the reported plan, and ultimately the decision was deemed a “good move” by the Commerce Secretary. The consideration was unrelated to the recent tariff increases, and Amazon is currently assessing the impact of those tariffs on its third-party sellers and overall business.
Read More
Amazon considered, but ultimately rejected, displaying tariff charges on its discount platform, Amazon Haul, a move intended to compete with Temu and Shein. This decision followed a report suggesting Amazon would show tariff costs, prompting strong White House condemnation and a phone call from President Trump to Jeff Bezos. No changes were implemented on Amazon’s main site. The episode highlights the growing consumer visibility of tariff-related price increases in online retail.
Read More
Temu’s ultralow prices are significantly impacted by Trump-era tariffs, resulting in substantial import fees for U.S. customers; these charges, sometimes exceeding the item’s original cost, are levied even on goods shipped from within the U.S. but manufactured in China. A notice on Temu’s site informs customers of these potential charges, which vary widely. The high tariffs, described by Barclays analysts as a de facto trade embargo, are causing considerable frustration among U.S. consumers, while other Chinese retailers appear unaffected. These increased costs, attributed to changes in global trade rules, are prompting price adjustments across Temu’s platform.
Read More
President Trump’s second term has seen a sharp decline in his economic approval ratings, with multiple polls showing significant disapproval of his handling of inflation, tariffs, and stock market volatility. A majority of respondents across various surveys believe the economy has worsened under his leadership. His inconsistent trade policies, including recently imposed and then partially suspended tariffs, have injected uncertainty into the market and raised concerns about higher prices and product shortages. This contrasts sharply with his initial success in 2020, which was fueled by economic optimism.
Read More
Despite President Trump confirming a phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping amid escalating tariff tensions, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce denies any ongoing trade negotiations between the two countries. The U.S. has levied tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese imports, prompting retaliatory tariffs from China. Trump, however, claims to have brokered 200 new trade deals with other countries and anticipates announcing these agreements soon. He views even high tariffs as a potential “total victory” for the U.S., suggesting significant economic benefits.
Read More
Following President Trump’s claim of active tariff negotiations with China, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a strong denial. The ministry stated that any suggestion of progress is baseless and that any future consultations must be conducted with mutual respect and equality. China’s position demands the complete removal of all U.S. tariffs as a precondition for negotiations, rejecting Trump’s assertion of a substantial tariff reduction. This underscores the significant impasse between the two nations regarding trade policy.
Read More
Despite a nearly 10 percent drop in foreign visitors to the U.S. in March compared to the previous year, President Trump downplayed concerns, attributing the decline to minor nationalism and a relatively weak dollar. JPMorgan estimates this decrease in tourism equates to a $29 billion loss in GDP, primarily due to Trump’s tariffs, exacerbated by incidents of foreign visitor detentions. These detentions, such as the cases of two German backpackers deported from Hawaii, have fueled concerns about potential negative impacts on tourism. The administration attempted to alleviate these concerns, but their messaging has been inconsistent and ineffective.
Read More
President Trump renewed his threat to raise tariffs on Canadian cars, potentially increasing them beyond the current 25 percent. He reiterated his false claim that the U.S. subsidizes Canada by $200 billion annually, while simultaneously suggesting annexation of Canada as the 51st state. Despite claiming to be working on a trade deal, Trump’s comments coincided with the Canadian federal election, seemingly influencing the campaign discourse. The Liberal leader, Mark Carney, has countered by emphasizing the need for a strong mandate to address Trump’s threats.
Read More
Following warnings from major retail CEOs about imminent price increases and empty shelves due to his trade policies, President Trump significantly softened his rhetoric. His threats to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell were also dialed back after market reactions caused significant stock drops. Consequently, Trump announced a reduction in planned tariffs and expressed optimism for a trade deal with China. These policy shifts, along with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s influence, led to a significant market rally. The president’s altered stance followed warnings from his economic advisors about the potential for further economic turmoil.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker