Aggressive foreign policy

U.S. Halts Immigration Cases for 19 Countries: Concerns and Criticisms Emerge

U.S. halts all immigration cases for nationals of nineteen countries, and it’s certainly a development that’s grabbing attention. The list includes a diverse set of nations, and the impact of this decision is bound to be felt across the globe and here at home.

The nineteen countries impacted by this immigration halt are a mixed bag, including Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. These countries faced the most severe restrictions. Others on the list include Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela, which were subject to partial restrictions.… Continue reading

Trump’s “Hell to Pay” Threat: Honduras Election Interference Echoes Past US Actions

The Honduran election has resulted in a very close contest, requiring an extended vote count by the National Electoral Council (CNE). Preliminary results show a narrow lead for Asfura over Nasralla. CNE head Ana Paola Hall has urged patience while the special counting process is completed. Accusations of external interference have surfaced, including claims that former U.S. President Trump is attempting to influence the outcome.

Read More

Trump’s Venezuela Threat: Potential Military Action Sparks Outrage and Fears

President Trump announced plans to initiate land strikes in Venezuela “very soon,” expanding the ongoing military operations that currently include attacks on boats suspected of drug trafficking in international waters. This expansion of military action comes after weeks of attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific, and amid a U.S. military buildup near Venezuela, including the deployment of significant naval and troop presence. While escalating military pressure, Trump also signaled openness to potential diplomatic engagement with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This decision follows the designation of the Cartel de los Soles as a foreign terrorist organization.

Read More

Denmark Sets Up “Night Watch” to Monitor Trump’s Actions Post-Greenland Row

The Danish government has established a “night watch” within its foreign ministry to monitor Donald Trump’s actions and statements while Copenhagen is asleep. This initiative, starting at 5 pm local time and producing a daily report by 7 am, was implemented in response to diplomatic tensions with the US, particularly concerning Greenland. The program reflects the need for Danish diplomacy to adapt to the current US administration. Jacob Kaarsbo, a former chief analyst, suggests this demonstrates a shift away from the traditional view of the US as Denmark’s primary ally, citing a lack of shared values with Trump.

Read More

Trump’s “Permanent Pause” on Third World Migration: Concerns and Criticism

Following an alleged shooting by an Afghan national, President Trump announced a suspension of migration from “third world countries.” This decision includes a re-examination of all Green Cards from “countries of concern,” a list of 19 nations previously targeted by a travel ban. Furthermore, the administration plans to eliminate federal benefits for non-citizens and deport foreign nationals deemed security risks or incompatible with “Western Civilization,” effectively intensifying existing anti-migrant policies. Trump framed these actions as necessary to reduce “illegal and disruptive populations” and stated that the current foreign population, of 53 million, are a strain on the country.

Read More

Trump Urges Japan to Soften Taiwan Stance, WSJ Reports

Trump told Japan’s PM in their call to lower the tone on Taiwan, WSJ reports, and it seems like this particular nugget of information has stirred up quite a reaction. The reports suggest that during a call, former President Trump advised Japan’s Prime Minister to dial back her rhetoric regarding Taiwan. The initial reaction, judging by the overall sentiment, seems to be a mix of shock, skepticism, and a healthy dose of cynicism.

The underlying concern seems to be that Trump’s actions, particularly in this context, could be interpreted as a willingness to appease China at the expense of allies and long-standing geopolitical strategies.… Continue reading

Coast Guard Reverses Decision, Reclassifies Swastikas and Nooses as Hate Symbols

Following an initial classification shift, the Coast Guard has reversed course and re-classified swastikas and nooses as hate symbols. Earlier reports indicated these symbols would be categorized as “potentially divisive” in new guidelines. This shift in policy comes after a report brought attention to the initial change. The updated classification was announced on November 21, 2025.

Read More

Coast Guard Reverses Course on Hate Symbol Policy Amidst Backlash

The U.S. Coast Guard released a new policy late Thursday that explicitly prohibits the display of hate symbols such as swastikas and nooses, reversing a previous plan to label them as “potentially divisive.” This updated policy clarifies that these symbols are strictly forbidden across all Coast Guard locations, a shift from an earlier version that allowed for their removal but did not outright ban them. The change came after public outcry and scrutiny following the discovery of the initial, more lenient policy. The Coast Guard stated the update was meant to combat misinformation and reaffirm its stance against hate symbols.

Read More

Coast Guard: Swastikas, Nooses Now “Potentially Divisive” Under New Policy

The U.S. Coast Guard will cease classifying the swastika as a hate symbol under a forthcoming policy change. This decision, set to take effect next month, reverses the previous classification despite the symbol’s association with fascism, white supremacy, and the atrocities of the Holocaust and World War II. The swastika’s connection to the deaths of millions, including over 400,000 American troops, has prompted controversy surrounding the policy shift. The Coast Guard has not released details as to why the change was necessary.

Read More

Trump Designates Saudi Arabia as Major Non-NATO Ally: Hypocrisy and 9/11 Ties

Trump designates Saudi Arabia as major non-NATO ally in defense agreement, and it certainly feels like a lot to take in, doesn’t it? It seems almost surreal, given everything. The implications, the history, the business ties – it all swirls together into a complex and controversial situation. It makes you wonder how we got here and where we’re headed.

Trump’s decision to elevate Saudi Arabia’s status to a major non-NATO ally has, unsurprisingly, ignited a firestorm of discussion. The core of the controversy centers on the inherent contradictions. On one hand, you have a nation with deep-seated ties to the United States.… Continue reading