Pope Leo XIV has issued a strong condemnation of the U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran, a military operation known as “Operation Epic Fury.” Despite lacking Congressional approval, President Trump vowed the operation would continue, prompting the pontiff to appeal for a de-escalation and a return to diplomacy, emphasizing that peace is achieved through dialogue, not violence. The article highlights the significant civilian and military casualties, including the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, and Iran’s subsequent retaliatory attacks, underscoring the pontiff’s urgent call to halt the spiral of violence. This condemnation aligns with Pope Leo XIV’s broader criticism of President Trump’s foreign policies and actions, including past interventions and stances on immigration.
Read More
The anticipation in Iran surrounding the selection of a new Supreme Leader is palpable, with the country’s Foreign Minister indicating that this pivotal decision could be made within a matter of days. This impending transition at the highest echelon of Iranian leadership naturally sparks considerable interest and speculation, both domestically and on the international stage. The process of choosing a successor to the previous Ayatollah, especially following his passing, is inherently complex and carries significant weight for the future direction of the nation.
The role of the Supreme Leader in Iran is one of immense power and influence, acting as the ultimate authority on state matters, including foreign policy, military affairs, and the interpretation of religious doctrine.… Continue reading
Despite President Trump’s campaign promises and claims of ending wars, he has initiated military action eight times, conducting attacks in seven countries in 2025 alone. His administration’s declaration of him as the “President of Peace” is demonstrably false, particularly in light of the recent U.S.-Israeli joint military action in Iran, aimed exclusively at regime change. This pattern of impulsive executive action, bypassing congressional authority and democratic guardrails, highlights a dangerous reliance on unilateral decision-making and overwhelming military force, driven by an unprincipled and unaccountable leader.
Read More
It appears there’s a significant ripple of discontent emanating from some of Donald Trump’s most vocal supporters and allies following a recent decision concerning Iran. This isn’t just a minor disagreement; for figures like Tucker Carlson and certain prominent MAGA voices, this action seems to represent a perceived betrayal of core principles and campaign promises.
Tucker Carlson, who has historically been a staunch defender of Trump, has publicly voiced strong condemnation of a joint U.S.-Israel action against Iran. He’s described the attack as “absolutely disgusting and evil,” suggesting it could dramatically alter the political landscape and the trajectory of Trump’s movement.… Continue reading
President Donald Trump initiated a military campaign against Iran, claiming the operation killed the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. This escalation, undertaken without broad international support or clear legal justification, is fostering a global perception of the U.S. as a rogue actor that fuels instability and disregards international law. Despite claims of preemptive action, evidence of an imminent Iranian threat is absent, and the administration has offered no plan to prevent further violence, leading to alarm among regional and European officials. This action, following recent U.S. policies regarding Gaza and Venezuela, further erodes international confidence in American judgment and adherence to global norms.
Read More
Australia was not involved in or informed about the recent Israeli-United States operation in Iran that resulted in the deaths of its leadership, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed Australia’s non-participation and urged a return to dialogue, while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expressed concern over regional escalation and hope for the Iranian people’s self-determination. The government is also taking steps to assist Australians in the region, with travel advice updated to warn against travel to several Middle Eastern countries. Observers suggest this operation may be setting conditions for regime change, though direct intervention by foreign powers is considered unlikely.
Read More
The Saudi Crown Prince reportedly urged President Trump to strike Iran, even while publicly advocating for diplomacy, according to The Washington Post. Following stalled nuclear talks and accusations of Iran resuming aspects of its nuclear program, the US and Israel conducted joint strikes against Iranian targets. In retaliation, Iran launched attacks on the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi cities, leading to regional condemnation and a deepening crisis. The situation escalated significantly with the reported death of Iran’s Supreme Leader in further strikes, prompting warnings of intensified Iranian retaliation against Israel and US bases.
Read More
The current US approach to Iran mirrors the flawed logic of the 2003 Iraq invasion, prioritizing performative displays of power over strategic necessity and the feasibility of stable political outcomes. This foreign policy, driven by a desire for dominance and attention, treats military force as the strategy itself rather than a tool to serve broader objectives. Such a non-strategic application of force risks significant regional instability, humanitarian crises, and the erosion of American credibility and alliances, even if the initial phase appears successful. The focus on spectacle over strategy suggests a dangerous disregard for long-term consequences, potentially leading to protracted conflict and unintended geopolitical repercussions.
Read More
White House chief of staff Susie Wiles consistently characterized President Donald Trump’s primary motivation as an agent of peace, even promoting him as “THE PEACE PRESIDENT.” This branding effort contrasted with earlier statements from Trump, who had promised to stop wars. However, the article notes a shift in rhetoric, with Trump later acknowledging the volatility of situations, such as a potential conflict with Iran, and White House press releases still referring to him as the “President of Peace” even while detailing military actions. Despite these claims, Trump’s public statements following US attacks on Iran emphasized military might and the annihilation of the Iranian navy, rather than de-escalation. The article concludes by detailing the significant casualties reported by Iranian state media resulting from these strikes, while noting the absence of reported American casualties.
Read More
President Donald Trump announced a war against Iran, claiming it posed a direct threat and that diplomacy had failed. However, the article argues that Trump lacks a clear plan for the aftermath, echoing the failures of the Iraq War where insufficient post-invasion preparations led to prolonged chaos and instability. Similar to past impulsive decisions, Trump appears to be initiating military action without adequate consideration for what comes next, potentially leaving the region and any potential Iranian opposition vulnerable.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood