According to a whistleblower report, Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) team at the Social Security Administration allegedly uploaded the sensitive personal information of over 300 million Americans to a vulnerable cloud server. The data, including addresses and birth dates, could be at risk of being leaked or hacked, potentially leading to widespread identity theft and other consequences. The whistleblower, the agency’s chief data officer, claims DOGE personnel violated security protocols and federal privacy laws. This incident raises concerns about the Trump administration’s influence and the potential for drastic cuts to federal programs, especially considering Musk’s history of questioning the agency’s legitimacy.
Read More
A Social Security whistleblower has alleged that the personal data of hundreds of millions of Americans was uploaded to a vulnerable cloud server, potentially accessible by a notorious DOGE operative. The database contained sensitive information like Social Security numbers, names, and addresses, which could lead to widespread identity theft and loss of benefits. The whistleblower, Charles Borges, warned of “catastrophic impact” due to the lack of oversight and security measures employed by DOGE. The SSA, however, denied any privacy breach, stating data is stored in a secure environment with robust safeguards, but this revelation adds to growing concerns about DOGE’s actions and their consequences.
Read More
In early 2020, Christina Chapman, a US resident, was recruited to facilitate remote employment for overseas IT workers, unknowingly assisting a North Korean government scheme. Chapman aided North Korean IT workers in securing jobs at various US companies, including Fortune 500 ones, by providing access to computers and assisting in identity theft, ultimately generating $17 million. This scheme involved North Korean IT workers posing as US citizens. Chapman’s actions, which she knew were illegal, led to an eight-year prison sentence for her role in the conspiracy, which included stealing identities and funneling funds to the North Korean government for weapons development.
Read More
A 24-year-old man was arrested for posing as a 16-year-old high school student, a situation that’s sparked a wave of reactions, ranging from amusement to outrage. The sheer audacity of the situation is certainly noteworthy. He managed to enroll in high school, even joining the junior varsity team, despite being significantly older than his classmates. This raises questions about the verification processes in place at the school, and highlights potential vulnerabilities in the system.
The man’s actions go beyond a simple case of mistaken identity or a harmless prank. He reportedly told the school he was a victim of human trafficking, a claim that was later proven false.… Continue reading
The Trump administration’s release of 64,000 unredacted JFK assassination files inadvertently exposed the personal information of hundreds of Americans, including Social Security numbers. This action prompted outrage from former government officials whose data was compromised, citing risks of identity theft and threats. While the White House acknowledged the error and initiated a response plan with the National Archives and Social Security Administration, the release yielded no significant new revelations about the assassination itself. Critics condemned the release as reckless and unprofessional, highlighting the potential harm inflicted on individuals without sufficient consideration.
Read More
A Maryland federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing sensitive personal data held by the Department of Education and Office of Personnel Management. The judge found that granting DOGE broad access to this information, including social security numbers and financial details, violated the Privacy Act of 1974. The lawsuit, filed by unions representing federal employees and student aid recipients, argued the access posed a significant identity theft risk. The court determined that while a “need-to-know” exception might exist, the government failed to justify DOGE’s sweeping access to millions of records for its stated purpose of auditing student loan programs. The order temporarily protects the plaintiffs’ data, pending further justification from the administration.
Read More
Matthew Keirans was sentenced to 12 years in prison for decades of aggravated identity theft against William Woods. Keirans, using Woods’ identity since 1988, built a life including marriage, employment, and substantial debt. This deception led to Woods’ wrongful arrest, forced medication, and incarceration for identity theft. After a long legal battle and with the help of DNA evidence, Woods’ true identity was confirmed, and Keirans’ crime was exposed. Woods now seeks compensation for his ordeal and aims to rebuild his life.
Read More
Michael Scheuer, a former Disney menu production manager, pleaded guilty to computer fraud and aggravated identity theft for hacking into Disney’s menu-creation software. He falsified allergen information, potentially endangering customers with severe allergies, and made other malicious alterations including adding a swastika to a menu and replacing wine region information with mass shooting locations. Although some altered menus were printed, Disney identified and isolated them before distribution and subsequently abandoned the compromised software. Following his termination, Scheuer also launched a denial-of-service attack targeting former colleagues.
Read More
Former Congressman George Santos’s February sentencing for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft has been postponed until April 25th to allow him more time to generate funds from his podcast to pay restitution. Santos’s defense argued the podcast’s delayed launch necessitates the extension, while prosecutors countered that this would improperly reward his criminal behavior, citing his substantial income from other ventures. The judge granted a ten-week delay, pushing the sentencing back to April. This decision has drawn criticism from constituents who argue that the delay undermines justice.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood