Pete Hegseth, President-elect Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, faced scrutiny over a college newspaper column published during his tenure as publisher of *The Princeton Tory*. The column, authored by another student, John Andrews, argued that unconsciousness, without duress, did not constitute rape. While Hegseth did not write the article, his role as publisher implies responsibility for the magazine’s content. The incident resurfaced amidst other past controversies, including allegations of sexual assault and his outspoken conservative views expressed in the magazine. The current publisher of *The Princeton Tory* stated that the responsibilities of the publisher role varied over time.
Read More
The release of the police report regarding the sexual assault allegation against Pete Hegseth has ignited a firestorm of debate and speculation. The report itself, while not resulting in charges, details a complex situation involving a woman who alleges she was assaulted after a night out, claiming to have blacked out after consuming alcohol. The account paints a picture of a woman who alleges she awoke to find Hegseth on top of her, having allegedly blocked her exit and taken her phone beforehand. This raises serious concerns about the possible use of a date rape drug, and highlights a pattern of behavior allegedly consistent with such acts.… Continue reading
The Bombay High Court upheld the rape conviction of a man who had consensual intercourse with his underage wife. The court ruled that sexual intercourse with a girl under 18 is rape, regardless of marriage or consent, citing the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The judge rejected the defense of consensual sex, emphasizing that the age of consent is 18. This decision reinforces that a girl’s marital status does not negate the illegality of sexual intercourse if she is a minor. The case involved a man who had a fraudulent marriage with a minor girl and continued to assault her.
Read More
Iraq is considering lowering the age of consent for girls to nine years old. This deeply disturbing proposal has sparked widespread outrage and condemnation. The sheer thought of legalizing sexual acts with children of that age is appalling, and the implications are devastating. There is no scenario in which a nine-year-old can genuinely consent to sexual activity; it is fundamentally impossible. This isn’t about consent; it’s about the legalization of the rape of children.
The fact that this amendment is even being considered is terrifying. The potential consequences for the well-being and safety of young girls are catastrophic. It normalizes and enables horrific abuse, setting a dangerous precedent with far-reaching repercussions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood