Democracy dies in cowardice, and the events surrounding Jeff Bezos’s decision to kill a Washington Post endorsement encapsulate this reality in stark relief. The audacity with which billionaires can stifle a crucial part of our democratic process is chilling. When a prominent publication drafts an endorsement for a presidential candidate, only for its billionaire owner to intervene and censor it, we are reminded how delicate our democratic fabric truly is. The very idea that Bezos would sit on this power, fearing backlash from an authoritarian figure like Donald Trump, speaks to a fear that ought not to exist in a leader of a free press.… Continue reading
Kamala Harris’s recent town hall on CNN was a momentous occasion that shed light on a pressing issue: the label of fascism as it pertains to Donald Trump. When she unequivocally stated, “Yes, I do think Trump is a fascist,” I felt a surge of validation rush through me. Here was a high-ranking official boldly calling out the authoritarian tendencies that have pervaded Trump’s rhetoric and actions. In a political climate where the word “fascist” is often tossed around carelessly, Harris’s commitment to unpacking this term felt crucial and timely.
Trump’s comments regarding his opponents as the “enemy from within” were striking.… Continue reading
The recent conversation sparked by a Fox host’s remark that perhaps Trump didn’t realize Hitler’s generals were Nazis strikes a nerve. In a world fueled by political polarization, such commentary reflects a troubling tendency to minimize the implications of Trump’s words and actions. The notion that an American president could casually invoke figures synonymous with heinous moral failure while simultaneously being portrayed as ignorant of their affiliations is bewildering. It raises fundamental questions about competency, accountability, and the troubling trajectory of political discourse.
Claiming that Trump might actually be too uninformed to connect the dots implies a startling lack of understanding of historical context.… Continue reading
The unfolding crisis at the Washington Post feels deeply personal to me. It’s not just about the resignation of an esteemed journalist like Robert Kagan or the discontent simmering among the editorial staff; it’s about a blow to an institution I deeply respect. Living in the D.C. area for over four decades, the Washington Post has been a constant in my life. My parents read it, I delivered it, and I have been a loyal subscriber. Watching its gradual transformation from a respected news organization to what some now perceive as a platform for billionaire interests feels like a betrayal.
The decision not to endorse Kamala Harris has become a watershed moment for the paper, one that highlights the intersection of media, money, and politics.… Continue reading
The decision by The Washington Post to abstain from endorsing a candidate in the 2024 presidential election after Jeff Bezos stepped in has left me unsettled, not just as a reader but as a citizen concerned about the future of our democracy. The complexities of media ownership and the intertwining interests of billionaires make it increasingly difficult to discern the truth from the agenda. When the editorial board of a storied institution like The Washington Post cannot voice its opinion on a critical election, we’re witnessing a troubling shift that feels both personal and troubling in a broader sense.
It’s remarkable to think that just decades ago, The Washington Post was synonymous with journalistic integrity and courage, famously exposing the Watergate scandal.… Continue reading
The news of at least a dozen mailed ballots intercepted in Mesa County before Colorado voters received them sends a chill down my spine. Each intercepted ballot embodies a significant threat to the very fabric of our democratic process. The implications of this event extend beyond simple election logistics; they raise profound questions about trust, accountability, and the integrity of our electoral system.
Our elections are meant to reflect the will of the people. They symbolize a society that values every voice, every vote. When I hear about ballots being intercepted—possibly altered or signed by the same individual—I can’t help but feel outrage at the audacity of those who exploit the democratic process.… Continue reading
The statement from a Fox host suggesting that perhaps Trump didn’t realize Hitler’s generals were Nazis feels like a low point in the effort to defend a man who has shown alarming familiarity with authoritarian rhetoric and figures. The attempt to dismiss such a significant historical understanding as a mere failure of intelligence is both troubling and deeply insulting. It implies that the standards for our leaders can be so low that ignorance becomes a viable excuse. Yet, in the context of what has been happening in U.S. politics, it’s more than enough to reflect on just how precariously we’re treading.… Continue reading
Kamala Harris’s recent question to Americans—“Are you really going to elect a guy who has good things to say about Hitler?”—is more than just a provocative statement; it encapsulates an alarming reality in our political landscape. It raises profound concerns about how far moral and ethical lines can be blurred in the name of political allegiance, and it forces us to confront the uncomfortable truth about a segment of the American electorate that seems willing to overlook monumental atrocities for the sake of their own gratification.
I’ve been processing the implications of this question, and I can’t help but feel a sense of dread as I see how many Americans are prepared to lend their support to a man who praises not just a historical dictator but a symbol of atrocity and suffering.… Continue reading
Walz’s recent remarks about Elon Musk skipping around like a “dipshit” at a Trump rally resonated with me on multiple levels. It’s not just the humor in the insult—a delightful jab that rolls off the tongue—but also the deeper implications of what that moment represents. Here’s a guy like Walz, a Midwestern politician unafraid to wield sharp, relatable language, standing against the backdrop of a political landscape often drenched in bland platitudes. In a time where political decorum has been eroded, this moment felt liberating.
Musk’s antics and his overt attempts to buy political influence through financial backing to a potential Trump administration should raise alarm bells.… Continue reading
The audacity of Donald Trump, proclaiming that he would “fire” special counsel Jack Smith “in two seconds” if he were elected again, is nothing short of alarming. This isn’t just a throwaway remark. It’s a chilling indication of his intentions and a stark reminder of the fragility of our democratic institutions. In a society that prides itself on law and order, the thought of a former president openly discussing the dismissal of someone pursuing justice against him feels like a direct assault on the very principles that bind us as a nation. It’s baffling to watch a significant portion of the electorate support a figure who so brazenly promotes corruption and undermines accountability.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood