The Supreme Court’s recent ruling against Greg Abbott’s attempt to restrict entry into Texas is a crucial step in upholding the principles of democracy and justice. It serves as a powerful reminder that no single individual, regardless of their position, should have unchecked authority to make unilateral decisions that affect the lives and well-being of citizens.
Abbott’s obsession with playing border patrol has come at a great cost. Over 26,000 Texas women have been forced to endure unwanted pregnancies due to his restrictive abortion ban. It is disheartening to witness a leader prioritize personal political gain over the health and autonomy of the people they are supposed to serve.… Continue reading
Fake Joe Biden robocall tells New Hampshire Democrats not to vote on Tuesday
As I read the headline about a fake Joe Biden robocall urging New Hampshire Democrats not to vote on Tuesday, a rush of emotions ran through me. Disgust, anger, and disbelief, to name a few. How could someone stoop so low to undermine our democracy in such a blatant and shameful way?
It is evident that this act is tantamount to election interference and fraud. Not only does it seek to deceive voters, but it also undermines the very foundations of our democratic system. The fact that these kinds of tactics have been used before, with little to no consequences, only exacerbates the frustration and distrust many of us feel.… Continue reading
As I sit here, reflecting on the headline “The Supreme Court Sounds Eager to Break the Government for Good,” a mixture of frustration and concern fills my mind. The article touches on a significant issue: the growing power of an unelected, conservative-dominated Supreme Court and its potential implications for our democratic system.
One key point raised in the comments is the potential shift in regulatory power. The Court’s recent major questions doctrine, which allows them to invalidate policies enacted by a Democratic president or Congress, is worrisome. It essentially gives untrained judges the authority to make decisions in regulatory fields where they lack expertise.… Continue reading
As I sit reflecting on the potential terror of a second Trump term, I can’t help but recall past economies under authoritarian regimes in Latin America, whether from the last century or even more recent events. His promises bear an uncanny resemblance to all the hallmarks of failed economies under these autocratic governments. From protectionist tariffs leading to shoddy domestic substitutions to extreme crony capitalism. The parallels are startling and a chilling foreshadowing of the path America could be led down under his continued leadership.
However, it’s not just the damaging economic policies that Trump has favored before which concern me.… Continue reading
In the wake of the recent controversy surrounding the legality of former President Donald Trump running for office again, I have found myself deeply engaged in reflection and analysis of the situation. The idea that barring Trump’s return to politics is anti-democratic is a sentiment that has pervaded our political discourse. However, after careful consideration, I submit a different notion: Barring Trump from running for office is not anti-democratic, but rather a necessity to protect democracy itself.
The foundation of my stance lies in the understanding of the Constitution, specifically Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This provision prohibits any person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof, from holding office.… Continue reading
Trump attacks Haley while referring to her by her first name Nimarata. This headline has sparked discussions surrounding racism, predictability of Trump’s actions, and the ongoing threat he poses to democracy. As an Indian American woman myself, this issue hits close to home.
Firstly, the comments questioning whether the GOP voting bloc is racist and how they perceive non-white individuals are disheartening but not entirely surprising. Racism exists within every society, and it is naive to assume that it doesn’t exist within the Republican Party. However, it is crucial to note that not all Republicans are racist, just as not all Democrats are free from prejudice.… Continue reading
As scarcely believable as it seems, former President Donald Trump recently expressed his frustration by characterizing his departure from the White House as “ridiculous.” It’s a peculiar statement that further emphasizes the depth of his insistence that he was robbed of a second term in office. Yet this constant claim by Trump has been meticulously tested in the courts and found wanting, so it’s puzzling that he would insist on this perspective.
His choice of the word “ridiculous” to describe the natural and legal sequence of events that follows an electoral defeat is a clear testament to his seeming disconnect from the political realities of democracy.… Continue reading
Over 1 million people took to the streets in Germany recently to rally against the rising power of the far-right party, the AfD. This massive turnout is a powerful display of resistance against the dangerous ideologies and discriminatory agenda that the AfD represents. It is heartening to see so many Germans come together to defend their democratic values and stand against intolerance.
One of the key issues that sparked this protest is the AfD’s support for the idea of “re-migration.” This concept involves expelling non-Germans, or even Germans with immigrant backgrounds, whom the AfD deems as not assimilated enough. It is a clear violation of the fundamental rights enshrined in the German constitution.… Continue reading
We are currently witnessing what many are calling the biggest judicial power grab since 1803, and it is a cause for concern for anyone who values democracy and the balance of power. The issue at the heart of this power struggle is the Chevron deference, a precedent established in 1984 that requires courts to defer to an agency’s interpretation of the law. However, this long-standing doctrine is now being challenged, and the ramifications of its potential downfall could be far-reaching.
The conservative shift in recent years has seen a change in attitude towards Chevron deference. Conservatives, who once championed the doctrine as a way to ensure that power remains in the hands of elected officials, have now started to view the unelected courts as a more effective means of controlling policymaking than the executive branch and its agencies.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker