African democracy

Brazil’s Bolsonaro vs. America’s Trump: Why the US Failed to Act

The Brazilian experience reflects a common pattern where leaders face legal consequences for offenses, a stark contrast to the U.S. system. In the United States, the slow prosecution of Trump for election interference, coupled with Republican obstruction and a desire to avoid political division, allowed him to run for president again and potentially escape accountability. Furthermore, the hesitation of Democratic leadership and the media to aggressively pursue charges against Trump, driven by a desire for bipartisanship, inadvertently weakened the defense of democratic principles. This approach failed to recognize that prosecuting Trump was not about punishing political enemies but about safeguarding democracy itself.

Read More

Trump’s Legacy: A Permanent Stain on America?

The United States’ ability to be a model for democracy is questioned as the country faces significant internal issues. The article highlights the current administration’s failures, citing Trump’s perceived incompetence, the administration’s lack of transparency, and the focus on self-interest over the nation’s well-being. Meanwhile, events like the violation of Polish airspace by Russian drones raise concerns about potential international conflict and the erosion of American ideals. The author fears that the ongoing political climate, marked by violence and the exploitation of tragedy, could lead to further destruction of liberty and the nation’s core values.

Read More

Brazilians Celebrate Bolsonaro Conviction, Offering Lessons for the US

Following the conviction of Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup, celebrations erupted in Brazil, while progressive leaders like Chile’s President Gabriel Boric hailed the decision as a victory for democracy. Conversely, right-wing figures, including those linked to Donald Trump, reacted with anger and threats. The conviction of Bolsonaro was met with relief by those who suffered during his administration and the date of the conviction gave a new meaning to the date of September 11th. Trump has responded by threatening tariffs and sanctions.

Read More

Brazil Sentences Bolsonaro to Over 27 Years for Coup Attempt: A Lesson for the US

In a landmark decision, a panel of Brazilian Supreme Court justices sentenced former President Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years and three months in prison. The conviction was on five counts, including attempting a coup after his 2022 electoral defeat. Bolsonaro’s co-conspirators also received lengthy sentences, and the ruling is expected to deepen political divisions. The US government has criticized the ruling and is expected to respond, adding further strain to US-Brazil relations.

Read More

Brazil Court Convicts Bolsonaro, Sparking Celebration and US Dismay

Brazil’s top court panel forming a majority to convict Bolsonaro for criminal organization, what a headline! It’s hard not to feel a surge of both admiration and a touch of envy. The fact that Brazil is taking a strong stand against a former leader, holding him accountable for alleged criminal activities, is truly commendable. It speaks volumes about the strength of their democratic institutions and their commitment to justice. It really makes you think about how the US handles its own political accountability.

It’s a bit surreal to process that a country once labeled a “banana republic” is now demonstrating such a clear commitment to upholding the rule of law while, at least in the perception of some, the US is lagging behind.… Continue reading

Nepal Army Takes Control Amid Riots: Negotiations Begin, Future Uncertain

Following a week of deadly protests and violence across Nepal, the army has regained control of the capital Kathmandu. The unrest, sparked by anger over social media bans and corruption, led to 30 deaths and the escape of over 13,500 prisoners. Negotiations have begun between protest leaders and the military, though no decisions were reached, while a former Chief Justice is considered a potential interim leader. The demonstrations, largely driven by the “Gen Z” movement, resulted in widespread destruction of government buildings, prompting concerns about the country’s democracy and calls for restraint from international organizations.

Read More

Trump Accused of Using Kirk’s Killing to Escalate War on Left and Democracy

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s death, former President Donald Trump declared the far-right media personality a “martyr” and blamed the political left for his killing. Trump’s rhetoric, delivered without confirmation of the shooter’s motive, served as a launchpad for attacking those who oppose his agenda. Prominent MAGA figures joined in, accusing the left of responsibility and calling for retaliation. The article warns that this response echoes historical patterns where right-wing governments have used incidents of political violence to justify repression, suppress dissent, and undermine constitutional rights, escalating the danger to democracy.

Read More

Brazilian Judges Convict Bolsonaro in Coup Plot Trial Amid US Concerns

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes initiated the trial by claiming that Jair Bolsonaro led a criminal organization aimed at reinstating a dictatorship in Brazil. The alleged plot involved a disinformation campaign and potential use of special forces assassins to seize power. Evidence presented suggested Bolsonaro attempted to undermine the electronic voting system and incite a military intervention after losing the 2022 election. The former president faces charges of leading an armed criminal organization and attempting a coup d’etat, which could result in a 43-year sentence.

Read More

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Fire FTC Commissioner, Sparks Outrage

The Supreme Court has temporarily allowed President Trump to fire a Federal Trade Commission member, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, despite a law meant to restrict the White House’s control over the agency. The court blocked a lower court’s ruling that reinstated Slaughter while the case continues, signaling the likelihood of granting the president broader firing authority. This action directly challenges a 1935 Supreme Court precedent limiting the president’s ability to remove FTC commissioners without cause, a restriction meant to protect the agency from political pressure. The Trump administration argues such restrictions unlawfully limit presidential power as defined by the Constitution.

Read More