President Trump suggested US taxpayers could reimburse energy companies for repairing Venezuelan oil infrastructure, anticipating significant investment after a potential leadership change. The US energy secretary is slated to meet with representatives from Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and ExxonMobil to discuss increasing Venezuelan production. These meetings are crucial to the administration’s goals of boosting exports, however, the three biggest US oil companies have yet to discuss the removal of Maduro with the administration. Despite the lack of prior communication, the White House believes the US oil industry is prepared to invest in rebuilding Venezuela’s oil infrastructure.
Read More
Trump says he’s prepared to send more US troops to Venezuela if the interim president doesn’t cooperate, and it’s difficult not to be immediately skeptical. The situation, as it seems, is a direct echo of past interventions, raising familiar questions about motives and consequences. If the initial aim was to arrest Maduro on drug charges, as suggested, why is cooperation from the Venezuelan government, led by an “interim president,” even necessary? This shift in the stated objectives feels less like a strategic plan and more like a demand, a “do what I say or else” scenario. The lack of transparency, especially the failure to release information justifying the earlier actions, doesn’t help build trust either.… Continue reading
Delcy Rodriguez formally sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president, and it’s difficult not to be struck by the immediate questions that arise. The whole situation feels unsettling, a bit like when a company’s leadership undergoes a sudden change. There’s an instinctive feeling that the fundamental issues haven’t been resolved, and perhaps the underlying problems will continue to persist.
Delcy Rodriguez formally sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president, and the core dilemma revolves around the United States’ justification for intervening in the first place. If the argument was that Maduro’s government was illegitimate and the Venezuelan people were suffering, why would his Vice President be a legitimate replacement?… Continue reading
In a recent interview, President Trump stated that Venezuela will not have elections in the next month, as the country must be “nursed back to health” first. He also indicated that the U.S. may subsidize oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s energy infrastructure, which could take less than 18 months. Trump confirmed that a group of U.S. officials will oversee the country’s involvement in Venezuela, with himself ultimately in charge. Moreover, Trump hinted at the potential for a second military incursion if cooperation ceases, while also denying reports of dismissing Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado.
Read More
Venezuela’s interim government says it is united behind Maduro after his U.S. capture, and that’s where we start, isn’t it? It seems like a lot of people, myself included, are scratching their heads about this whole situation. The official line is that the “interim government” is backing Maduro after his capture by the US. But is that what’s actually happening? This whole thing feels… complicated, to say the least. It’s hard to ignore the feeling that something more is going on beneath the surface, that the narrative being presented publicly might not be the whole truth.
Considering the supposed aim of removing Maduro, it seems odd that the “interim government” would publicly express its support.… Continue reading
Following the extraction of Nicolas Maduro by U.S. forces, Venezuela’s military recognized Vice President Delcy Rodriguez as the acting leader, appointed by the Supreme Court for 90 days. Rodriguez, who had served as Maduro’s vice president, condemned the U.S. actions as a kidnapping but left the door open for dialogue, while the Trump administration issued a warning regarding her cooperation. Maduro, along with his wife, arrived in New York to face federal charges, while the Venezuelan Defense Minister reported casualties from the U.S. operation and urged citizens to resume normal activities.
Read More
Economic confidence has plummeted to a 17-month low, coinciding with rising healthcare costs and the expiration of ACA credits, leading to potential premium hikes for millions. Despite these domestic issues, the Trump Administration has signaled intentions to intervene in Venezuela, raising concerns about priorities and motivations. A majority of Venezuelans and Americans oppose such intervention, particularly due to the perception of a resource grab, specifically oil, rather than genuine concern for the country’s welfare. This diversion tactics, amid economic struggles and other looming crises, raises questions about the administration’s true objectives and the potential consequences for both nations.
Read More
Trump says US oil companies will spend billions in Venezuela, and that statement, frankly, sets off a lot of alarm bells. It’s hard not to read this as a clear signal of an impending oil grab, a move designed to enrich a select few at the expense of both the Venezuelan people and, quite possibly, the American taxpayer. The focus here seems to be less about helping Venezuela and more about lining the pockets of those who have supported him.
Trump’s announcement arrives against the backdrop of a potentially unstable situation in Venezuela. We’re talking about a country rich in oil, but one that has been grappling with political turmoil and economic hardship.… Continue reading
Following the capture of Nicolas Maduro, President Trump announced the United States’ intention to take over Venezuela, including seizing its oil reserves. He justified this action, citing Maduro’s illegitimate leadership and the need to secure Venezuela’s oil resources, planning to invest billions in infrastructure improvements. Trump’s decision, made without Congressional authorization, has sparked mixed reactions, with some, like Elon Musk, supporting the move and others, including some of Trump’s MAGA base, criticizing it. The operation, which involved a military presence and strikes, has raised questions about the U.S.’s long-term plan for running the country and the implications of this intervention.
Read More
In a shocking move, the United States launched an attack on Venezuela, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and vowing to temporarily control the country. President Trump announced plans for U.S. oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s infrastructure and secure its oil reserves. Despite the operation, which resulted in reported casualties, Venezuelan officials condemned the intervention as an act of aggression and vowed defiance. International leaders and Democrats voiced strong criticism, labeling the action as an example of American imperialism.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood