The EPA has ruled that Elon Musk’s xAI acted unlawfully by utilizing numerous methane gas turbines to power its data centers in Tennessee. The agency’s decision revises policies regarding gas turbines, asserting that air permits are required regardless of their temporary nature. This ruling is a victory for community activists concerned about the data centers’ pollution, particularly in historically Black neighborhoods. The EPA estimates that the action will lead to substantial annual reductions in harmful emissions by 2032.
Read More
The Environmental Protection Agency has announced a change in its approach to air pollution regulations. The agency will no longer calculate the monetary value of health benefits, such as avoided healthcare costs and prevented deaths, when assessing rules for fine particulate matter and ozone, focusing instead on costs to industry. This shift, part of a broader business-friendly realignment, has drawn criticism from environmental and public health advocates who view it as a dangerous abandonment of the agency’s core mission to protect public health. While the EPA insists it remains committed to its mission and will still quantify emissions, critics argue that the change could lead to weakened safeguards, potentially allowing increased pollution and disregarding the value of lives saved and health benefits.
Read More
The Environmental Protection Agency has recently removed all mentions of fossil fuels, the primary driver of global warming, from its online page explaining climate change causes. This change now solely emphasizes natural phenomena, despite scientific consensus attributing nearly all warming to human activity. Several scientists and former EPA officials have criticized this alteration as misleading and detrimental to public understanding. Furthermore, links related to climate change impacts and risks on the EPA website are now broken. This action follows the removal of the national climate assessment earlier this year, raising concerns about the government’s transparency regarding climate change information.
Read More
The EPA recently approved ten pesticide products containing isocycloseram, a PFAS “forever chemical,” for use in agriculture and pest control. Although the EPA claims no human health risks were identified when used as directed, environmental advocates express concerns about the long-term dangers associated with PFAS exposure, such as reproductive and liver toxicity. Researchers emphasize the persistence of isocycloseram and its toxicity to pollinators. While the EPA highlighted the benefits for crop management, concerns remain due to the potential ecological and public health impacts.
Read More
The Vatican is returning 62 Indigenous cultural objects, including a century-old Inuvialuit kayak, to Canada after Pope Leo XIV gifted them to the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops. These items, collected from First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities, were originally sent to Rome for a 1925 exhibition and have been stored in the Vatican Museums. This decision follows Pope Francis’s 2022 visit to Canada and his acknowledgement of the importance of restitution. The artifacts will be transferred to the National Indigenous Organizations to be returned to their communities of origin.
Read More
A coalition of over 20 states has filed a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency, contesting the agency’s decision to cancel the $7 billion “Solar For All” program. The program, established by the Inflation Reduction Act to expand solar power access for low-income households, was intended to deploy rooftop and community solar projects, aiming to reduce carbon pollution and lower energy costs. The lawsuit claims that the EPA’s cancellation of the program violated the Administrative Procedures Act and overstepped its constitutional authority. This legal action follows a similar suit filed by nonprofits and solar installers and represents a two-pronged effort by states to challenge cuts to clean energy programs.
Read More
Wyoming Representative Harriet Hageman faced a hostile reception at a town hall event in Pinedale while defending the potential repeal of the EPA’s “endangerment finding” regarding greenhouse gases. Hageman asserted the finding was based on “false science,” sparking boos and shouts from the audience. This event marks another instance of Hageman encountering an angry crowd over Trump administration policies, with similar reactions seen in a previous town hall in Laramie. Despite the state’s strong support for Trump, local concerns about poor air quality and widespread belief in climate change appear to be at odds with the administration’s stance on emission standards.
Read More
Trump’s EPA to repeal core of greenhouse gas rules in a major deregulatory move. This is, without a doubt, the biggest deregulatory step in U.S. history, and it’s setting off alarm bells everywhere. It’s like they’re actively dismantling the safeguards put in place to protect our environment and, by extension, our health. The sheer scale of this move is hard to fathom, with consequences that will ripple through every aspect of life.
EPA head claims carbon dioxide’s benefits are overlooked, which, frankly, is a jaw-dropping statement. This is, to put it mildly, a controversial take, going directly against the mountain of scientific evidence that points to the detrimental impacts of greenhouse gas emissions.… Continue reading
The Trump administration is seeking to overturn the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment finding,” which classified greenhouse gas emissions as a threat and served as the basis for climate regulations. This proposal aims to revoke the government’s authority to regulate pollutants from burning fossil fuels, like carbon dioxide and methane, under the Clean Air Act. The administration argues this move would drive down costs and boost American energy production, while critics express concerns about undermining climate action and benefiting the fossil fuel industry. The EPA is making legal arguments that the previous administration overstepped their authority. This decision faces potential legal challenges and could take years to resolve.
Read More
EPA to withdraw foundation of greenhouse gas rules, sources say, and it’s frankly infuriating. It’s like watching everything you thought was a given, things you learned as a kid even, being systematically dismantled. The idea that regulations meant to protect our planet are being undone for the sake of a few extra bucks in the pockets of those who will likely not even be around to face the consequences is, to put it mildly, disheartening.
The core of this issue seems to be the EPA’s intention to reverse a crucial scientific finding. This finding, the “endangerment finding,” is what provides the legal justification for the major regulations we have in place to deal with climate change.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood