Two-thirds of the DOJ unit defending Trump policies in court have quit. That’s the headline, and it’s a significant one. This isn’t some minor reshuffling; it’s a mass exodus from a specific branch of the Justice Department, the Federal Programs Branch. What’s important to note is that these departures were voluntary. This wasn’t a situation of being forced out for disagreeing with the administration. These lawyers made a conscious choice to leave.
The voluntary nature of these departures suggests a deeper issue. It implies these professionals were making a stand based on their own values and principles. It’s hard to ignore the potential ethical concerns that might have driven them to such a decision.… Continue reading
Attorney General Pam Bondi has fired her personal ethics advisor, Joseph Tirrell, a career attorney with nearly 20 years of service, without stating a reason for his removal. Tirrell, who headed the DOJ’s ethics office, advised senior officials on matters such as financial disclosures and conflicts of interest, and also provided guidance to all DOJ employees. His removal may be related to the roughly 20 employees involved in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations, where Tirrell had advised on ethics matters. The move comes amidst other departures of key oversight officials, raising concerns about the potential politicization of the Justice Department.
Read More
Adam Boyd, a 33-year-old attorney, resigned from ICE, citing a shift in focus from national security to deportation numbers. Boyd reported that this change was due to pressure from the White House, specifically Stephen Miller, who set a daily arrest quota. He claims that ICE attorneys are dismissing legitimate cases to increase deportation statistics, which he says is at the expense of due process. Boyd stated that many ICE attorneys share his concerns and plan to leave the agency once their student loans are forgiven.
Read More
Dershowitz says he knows Epstein client list names: ‘But I’m bound by confidentiality’ – what a statement, huh? It’s like he’s dangling a carrot, but the carrot’s a list of potentially very powerful and ethically compromised people, and he’s claiming he can’t share. The immediate reaction, and it’s hard to disagree, is that he’s trying to protect himself. It’s the classic move: hint at knowledge, generate buzz, and stay relevant while subtly avoiding any real consequences. The question really is: why say anything at all if you can’t reveal the names? The answer feels pretty obvious, he’s using the information he supposedly has to his advantage.… Continue reading
Following the establishment of a controversial detention center in Florida, several food truck companies faced significant online backlash after being filmed at the facility. Social media posts, including a viral TikTok, called for boycotts of Kona Ice, Churro Mania, Elote Lovers, and Ms. Cheezious due to their catering services. In response, the companies issued statements clarifying their involvement, with some emphasizing they were contracted to serve construction crews or did not support the facility’s purpose. The backlash highlighted the public’s negative perception of the detention center and prompted the businesses to reassess their booking practices and clarify their positions on the matter.
Read More
Columbia University has received a warning from the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, putting its accreditation at risk. The commission cited “insufficient evidence” of compliance with standards on ethics and integrity as the reason for the warning. This formal notification was sent to Columbia’s Acting President, Claire Shipman. The university’s accreditation status is now under scrutiny due to these concerns.
Read More
Senator Elizabeth Warren has expressed deep concern regarding potential corruption within the incoming Trump administration. She highlights the lack of signed transition agreements, which include crucial ethics safeguards, as a troubling indication of disregard for conflict of interest prevention. This concern is rooted in the financial dealings of the Trump organization during his first presidency, where his businesses reportedly garnered over $2 billion, including significant income from his properties frequented by foreign dignitaries. Furthermore, the involvement of Donald Trump Jr. in a venture capital firm opposing ESG investing raises further red flags, potentially creating a conflict of interest should the administration pursue policies against such investments. These developments, in Senator Warren’s view, raise serious concerns about the potential for corruption and manipulation within the Trump administration.
Read More
Senator Elizabeth Warren has accused former President Donald Trump and his transition team of breaking the law by refusing to sign an ethics agreement, a crucial step in ensuring a smooth and transparent transition of power. Warren, who played a key role in crafting the law that requires incoming presidents to prevent conflicts of interest, expressed her outrage, stating that this blatant disregard for the law constitutes illegal corruption.
The issue centers around a requirement for incoming presidents to sign an ethics agreement as part of the transition process. This agreement is designed to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and promote ethical conduct during the transfer of power.… Continue reading
IKEA will pay €6m ($6.5m) to a German government fund set up to compensate victims of forced labour under the country’s communist regime. Political and criminal prisoners during the Cold War era were forced to build flatpack furniture for IKEA, which was aware that political prisoners were being used, according to an investigation by Ernst & Young. IKEA Germany said the payment was the result of a long-term discussion with the Union of Victims’ Associations of Communist Dictatorship. This is the first payment of its type and has been welcomed by advocacy groups who hope this will prompt other companies to follow. Germany’s parliament will vote on the establishment of the fund in the coming weeks.
Read More
Starting from Friday, hospital patients in Texas will be asked about their legal status in the US, following an order by Republican Governor Greg Abbott. The aim is to track spending on non-resident patients in an attempt to recover funds from the federal government. Critics argue this could deter people from seeking essential healthcare. Florida initiated a similar policy in 2020. Patients are not obligated to answer and hospital workers must inform them that their care will not be influenced by their response.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker