Actual Malice

Palin Loses Defamation Retrial Against New York Times

A federal jury ruled against Sarah Palin in her defamation retrial against the New York Times, upholding the newspaper’s non-liability for a 2017 editorial inaccurately linking Palin to a mass shooting. This verdict, following a 2022 ruling overturned on appeal, reinforces the “actual malice” standard, requiring proof of knowing falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth. The case garnered significant attention due to the high-profile individuals involved and its implications for free speech in the current political climate. Despite the loss, Palin expressed contentment with her personal life and remained undecided on an appeal.

Read More

Dogecoin, Nuclear Secrets, and the Looming Threat to US Security

The Nevada Supreme Court rejected Steve Wynn’s appeal to overturn a lower court ruling against him in a defamation case stemming from a 2021 article detailing allegations of sexual misconduct. The court found Wynn failed to demonstrate actual malice in the reporting of the manicurist’s account of forced sexual contact. Wynn’s subsequent Supreme Court petition argues that the current media landscape, characterized by readily accessible publishing and a prevalence of potentially inaccurate reporting, renders the established defamation standard obsolete. This petition seeks to overturn the established precedent in light of these changed circumstances.

Read More