Suzanne Swierc will receive $225,000 in a settlement following her termination from Ball State University. Swierc was fired for a private Facebook post criticizing conservative activist Charlie Kirk after his death, which the university claimed caused significant disruption. The ACLU argued the firing violated Swierc’s free speech rights as she was speaking as a private citizen on a matter of public concern. Ball State stated the settlement was a financially prudent decision compared to litigation costs, citing the potential harm to student enrollment and fundraising caused by the controversy.
Read More
A Canadian plaintiff, identified as John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in U.S. federal court, alleging an overreaching attempt to obtain extensive personal information through Google. This action stems from social media posts critical of the former Trump administration, particularly concerning immigration policies. The ACLU, representing the plaintiff, contends that this summons represents a “transparent gambit to chill speech the government doesn’t like” and an un-American infringement on free expression, even for non-citizens. Google has stated it reviews all legal demands and pushes back against those that are overly broad or improper.
Read More
Families of two Trinidadian fishermen, Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo, are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death after they were killed in an October 2025 U.S. airstrike in the Caribbean Sea. The lawsuit, filed by the ACLU, argues that the strike was an illegal act of murder, as the men were civilians and not involved in any armed conflict. The Trump administration has defended the strikes, claiming they targeted “narco-terrorists,” but the families maintain that Joseph and Samaroo were simply returning home from work. The suit is the first legal challenge against the U.S. over the 36 deadly boat strikes that have killed at least 126 people since September.
Read More
The U.S. government is facing a lawsuit from the families of two Trinidadian men, Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo, who were killed in a U.S. military strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat in October. The suit, filed on behalf of the families by the ACLU and others, alleges wrongful death and extrajudicial killings, contesting the Trump administration’s justification for the strike, which claimed the men were “narcoterrorists”. The families maintain Joseph and Samaroo were simply returning home from work in Venezuela and had no ties to illegal activities. The lawsuit cites violations of the Death on the High Seas Act and the Alien Tort Statute, challenging the legality of the strike and seeking accountability for the deaths.
Read More
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a district court ruling that limited federal agents’ interactions with protesters and observers of immigration enforcement. The appellate court granted the federal government’s request for a stay, citing the lower court’s order as overly broad and impractical for daily operations. This reversal followed a lawsuit by the ACLU of Minnesota, alleging federal agents violated protesters’ rights during immigration operations. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi praised the appellate court’s decision, arguing the original ruling undermined federal law enforcement.
Read More
A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction, restricting federal officers from retaliating against, arresting, or using nonlethal force on individuals peacefully protesting and observing immigration enforcement operations in the Minneapolis area. The ruling specifically addresses actions related to “Operation Metro Surge,” following a lawsuit from the ACLU-MN on behalf of community members who claimed their constitutional rights were violated by ICE. This decision comes after increased ICE activity in the Twin Cities, including the recent shooting death of legal observer Renee Nicole Good and a request from the plaintiffs’ lawyers for immediate action due to escalating violence. The court also clarified that following ICE vehicles at a safe distance does not constitute reasonable suspicion for a stop.
Read More
A class-action lawsuit has been filed against the Trump administration by the ACLU of Minnesota and other law firms, alleging unlawful arrests by ICE and CBP agents. The lawsuit focuses on the impact of Operation Metro Surge, which has led to increased ICE presence and targeted Somali and Latino communities. The plaintiffs claim that federal agents have violated constitutional rights through racial profiling and unlawful seizures, citing instances of individuals being detained without warrants or verification of immigration status. The ACLU asserts that these practices are both illegal and morally reprehensible.
Read More
The ACLU has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration alleging that federal immigration authorities in Minnesota have engaged in racial profiling and unlawful arrests during ICE raids. The 72-page lawsuit claims that federal agents disproportionately targeted Somali and Latino communities, violating citizens’ constitutional rights. The lawsuit details instances where U.S. citizens were detained, questioned, and even subjected to pepper spray, despite providing proof of citizenship. The ACLU asserts that these actions constitute a grave violation of fundamental rights, and a breach of American laws.
Read More
Human rights organizations, including the ACLU, have alleged widespread abuse at Camp East Montana, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility at Fort Bliss. These organizations claim detained immigrants are coerced into crossing the border into Mexico, even if they have no connection to the country, or face being sent to jail in third countries. The report details physical abuse, sexual misconduct by officers, medical neglect, and denied access to legal counsel, prompting calls for the camp’s closure. Detainees describe instances of assault, threats, and substandard living conditions, leading organizations to demand a thorough investigation into the alleged human rights violations.
Read More
The Wisconsin Supreme Court will directly hear a case brought by the ACLU on behalf of an immigrant rights group challenging the legality of local jails holding immigrant detainees at the request of federal authorities. The court, controlled 4-3 by liberal justices, will expedite the process, potentially reaching a final ruling by mid-2026. The lawsuit, filed against five county sheriffs, argues that honoring ICE detainers, which extend detention beyond state law requirements, constitutes illegal arrests. The ACLU contends that this practice, which has seen over 700 requests in the first seven months of the year, violates Wisconsin law, while the sheriffs maintain their actions are lawful within the existing framework.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker
Judge Rules ICE Cannot Retaliate Against Minnesota Protesters
A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction, restricting federal officers from retaliating against, arresting, or using nonlethal force on individuals peacefully protesting and observing immigration enforcement operations in the Minneapolis area. The ruling specifically addresses actions related to “Operation Metro Surge,” following a lawsuit from the ACLU-MN on behalf of community members who claimed their constitutional rights were violated by ICE. This decision comes after increased ICE activity in the Twin Cities, including the recent shooting death of legal observer Renee Nicole Good and a request from the plaintiffs’ lawyers for immediate action due to escalating violence. The court also clarified that following ICE vehicles at a safe distance does not constitute reasonable suspicion for a stop.
Read More