The article explores the controversy surrounding Donald Trump’s demolition and planned jumbo-sized rebuilding of the East Wing, funded by donations from individuals with potential business interests before the government, drawing a comparison to the criticism faced by the Clinton Foundation. While this situation would have been considered a major scandal in the past, the author argues that the media is not holding Trump accountable in the same way, due to the magnitude of his other actions. This is evident in the lack of outrage, the secrecy of the donors, and the open nature of Trump’s actions that benefit his friends. Ultimately, the author emphasizes how the standard of conduct in Washington has drastically fallen under Trump’s presidency, and that praise for merely committing a normal-size scandal is unwarranted.
Read More
In light of King Charles’ recent decision to strip Andrew of his title, several Democrat members of the US House Oversight Committee have renewed their calls for Andrew to testify about his association with Jeffrey Epstein. These calls for testimony come from members who believe Andrew possesses crucial information and should cooperate with the investigation. The members believe Andrew’s testimony would not only help survivors but also prevent future occurrences of similar offenses. Despite the challenges of compelling testimony from someone outside the US, the committee members have indicated they would be willing to formally subpoena Andrew if he were to enter the United States.
Read More
US military kills three in strike on drug-trafficking vessel in Caribbean, Hegseth says, and the immediate reaction is, well, skepticism. It’s hard to avoid the gut feeling that something isn’t right when we’re presented with a story like this. The core of the issue, at least from what I gather, seems to be a lack of concrete proof. We’re told that a vessel was targeted and three people were killed, allegedly involved in drug trafficking, but where’s the evidence? The questions flood in immediately: What constitutes a “drug-trafficking vessel”? How was this determined? Was there any due process, any attempt at arrest, or was it a shoot-first-ask-questions-later scenario?… Continue reading
Despite President Trump’s survival of multiple legal and political challenges, his actions are not solely his own, relying on numerous individuals to carry out his agenda. To counteract this, Democrats must target Trump’s “happy helpers,” making it clear that they will be held accountable for their actions, even if not immediately. Instances like the Illinois Accountability Commission demonstrate a path forward. The normalization of authoritarian behavior necessitates a forceful response from Democrats, who must publicly warn all involved in undermining democratic institutions that their conduct will be scrutinized. Democratic leaders must impose accountability and demonstrate that corruption in Washington will no longer be consequence-free.
Read More
A bipartisan group, including Republican Thomas Massie, Democrat Ro Khanna, and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, gathered to raise awareness about the Jeffrey Epstein case and demand the release of relevant files. The event, held in front of the Capitol, featured victims like Annie Farmer, who shared their experiences of abuse and the lack of justice they received. Speakers emphasized the need to hold all accomplices accountable and shed light on the pervasive failure of the justice system in this case, while also acknowledging the complexities arising from legal agreements and the financial interests involved.
Read More
During a late October 2025 news conference amid a government shutdown, U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that Democrats were required to reopen the government, and that Republicans were not “in charge” due to the Senate’s 60-vote threshold. Johnson’s remarks correctly attributed the responsibility for reopening the government to Democrats, emphasizing the need for their support given the Republicans’ minority status in the Senate. The comments were made in the context of ongoing negotiations, where the House of Representatives needed to pass a bill to reopen the government. The Democratic Party highlighted Johnson’s remarks in comparison to an earlier statement where he acknowledged Republicans’ control of the White House and both houses of Congress.
Read More
The US State Department has eliminated its online portal, the Human Rights Reporting Gateway (HRG), which served as a channel for reporting human rights violations by foreign military units equipped with American weapons. This portal was established in 2022 to comply with the Leahy Law, which mandates the government to gather information on alleged human rights abuses. Critics, including a former congressional aide involved in drafting the law, have condemned the removal, arguing it undermines the ability to monitor and address such violations. While the State Department maintains it is still adhering to its legal obligations, the closure comes amidst a broader restructuring and a perceived shift in focus on human rights within the department.
Read More
In a move signaling potential changes to oversight of his construction projects, President Trump has terminated all members of the Commission of Fine Arts (CFA). This commission, comprised of members appointed by the president, typically reviews designs for memorials, government buildings, and other projects within Washington, D.C. The White House had previously declined to comment on whether Trump would submit his proposed ballroom design for CFA review, while some experts suggest Trump might bypass it based on a precedent set by Harry Truman. With the CFA cleared, the National Capital Planning Commission, led by Trump allies, is expected to review the ballroom plans.
Read More
The Trump administration is actively working to suppress any efforts to document or protest its policies. Following the announcement of a website to track potential human rights violations by ICE, the Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General Pam Bondi condemned the initiative and threatened legal action against those who threaten law enforcement. Moreover, Bondi took credit for Apple removing the ICEBlock app from its App Store, effectively stifling tools that aid in tracking ICE activities. These actions are part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to stifle dissent and eliminate political opposition by curbing funding and access to resources.
Read More
Recent events have highlighted a pattern of apparent ignorance from the president regarding crucial policy decisions and the actions of his own administration. Trump has repeatedly responded to direct questions about pardons, foreign policy, and administrative actions with “I don’t know.” This pattern of non-answers extends to topics ranging from military aid and student visa policies to even basic constitutional concepts. The frequency of these instances raises questions about the president’s knowledge and involvement in the very matters he is responsible for overseeing.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Noem’s Response to ICE Misconduct Tracker: Thinly Veiled Threats and Accusations
The Trump administration is actively working to suppress any efforts to document or protest its policies. Following the announcement of a website to track potential human rights violations by ICE, the Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General Pam Bondi condemned the initiative and threatened legal action against those who threaten law enforcement. Moreover, Bondi took credit for Apple removing the ICEBlock app from its App Store, effectively stifling tools that aid in tracking ICE activities. These actions are part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to stifle dissent and eliminate political opposition by curbing funding and access to resources.
Read More