The statement, “I broke into the Capitol on January 6th – now I’ll be a VIP at Trump’s inauguration,” is deeply unsettling. It encapsulates a disturbing normalization of the events of that day and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. The sheer audacity of this claim speaks volumes about the political climate and the lingering effects of the January 6th insurrection.
This individual’s boast highlights a profound disconnect between actions and consequences. The act of storming the Capitol, a symbol of American democracy, was an attempt to subvert the democratic process through violence or the threat of violence. To then be rewarded with VIP status at a political event is deeply troubling and suggests a complete lack of accountability.… Continue reading
President Biden advocates for a constitutional amendment explicitly removing presidential immunity from prosecution for crimes committed while in office. This proposed amendment aims to ensure accountability for all actions taken by a president, regardless of their position. The call for such an amendment follows ongoing debates about executive power and the rule of law. This initiative seeks to clarify and strengthen the principle of equal justice under the law.
Read More
Several of Trump’s controversial nominees, including Pete Hegseth for Defense Secretary and Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, possess extreme views and/or face credible accusations of misconduct. While some may be blocked due to scandals, their replacements would likely share similarly objectionable ideologies. This pattern extends to other nominees such as Linda McMahon and Brendan Carr, highlighting a concerning trend of prioritizing loyalty over qualifications. The unconfirmed appointment of Tom Homan as border czar further underscores this alarming disregard for established norms.
Read More
Garland’s intention to release a portion of Jack Smith’s report concerning the January 6th probe has sparked considerable outrage and skepticism. The timing, three years after the events in question, is viewed by many as far too late, fueling accusations of deliberate inaction and a lack of commitment to accountability. This delayed release reinforces a sense of profound disappointment in the Attorney General, with some questioning his overall effectiveness and suggesting his actions are too little, too late.
The decision to release only a portion of the report, specifically Volume 1 covering the DC case on Trump’s attempts to overturn the election, is met with significant criticism.… Continue reading
Trump urges Attorney General Merrick Garland to block the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report, a move that has ignited intense debate. The former president’s request is seen by many as a blatant attempt to suppress potentially damaging information, highlighting a deep-seated distrust in the justice system’s ability to hold powerful individuals accountable.
This request underscores a pattern of behavior where Trump repeatedly attempts to obstruct investigations into his actions. The sheer audacity of the request is remarkable, revealing a profound disregard for transparency and the principles of accountability that should govern public officials. It fuels existing suspicions about a potential cover-up and further erodes public trust.… Continue reading
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is straightforward and confidential, allowing for the sharing of important information. All tips will be reviewed by the editorial team. This ensures a reliable and responsive platform for sharing news leads.
Read More
Four years after the January 6th insurrection, the author, a Capitol Police Sergeant, reflects on the violence he endured, emphasizing it surpassed even his experiences in Iraq. He expresses profound betrayal by the lack of accountability for those who incited the riot, the delayed or denied benefits for injured officers, and the political maneuvering that enabled the perpetrators’ continued influence. Despite a peaceful transfer of power this time, the author feels let down by officials who prioritize politics over justice, even inviting rioters to the inauguration. Ultimately, the author laments the failure of elected officials to condemn the events and hold those responsible accountable, turning January 6th into a badge of honor rather than a condemnation.
Read More
President Aliyev, meeting with families of victims and survivors of the Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 crash, stated that the investigation’s initial findings place blame for the tragedy on Russian Federation representatives. He asserted Azerbaijan’s demand for justice, punishment of those responsible, and full transparency in the process. While withholding full details of the ongoing criminal case, the president emphasized the Azerbaijani government’s commitment to accountability. This demand for justice stems from the loss of Azerbaijani lives in this disaster.
Read More
New year, new playbook: No more bipartisan favors for the GOP. This is a sentiment echoing across various political discussions. The time for enabling the Republican party through bipartisan compromises is over. The repeated concessions made by Democrats haven’t yielded positive results; instead, they’ve emboldened the GOP to continue pushing their agenda regardless of the consequences. A new strategy is needed, one that prioritizes Democratic values and holds the Republicans accountable for their actions.
This new approach demands a decisive shift in tactics. No more should Democrats vote for GOP bills, even if seemingly innocuous. The Republicans hold the majority; let them own the responsibility of passing their legislation.… Continue reading
The Judicial Conference refused to refer Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice for investigation despite his failure to disclose lavish gifts and travel, citing jurisdictional concerns and claiming his amended disclosures addressed the issues. This decision effectively guts the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which explicitly grants the Conference this referral power, leaving Thomas without accountability for his actions. The Conference’s assertion that Thomas is now compliant is contradicted by evidence showing continued omissions in his disclosures. This lack of accountability highlights the judiciary’s inability to police itself and foreshadows a likely lack of investigation by the incoming Trump administration, solidifying a system where powerful figures face no repercussions for ethical violations.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker