The Trump administration has issued letters to nine universities, requesting that they commit to a “compact” that aligns with the administration’s political objectives to retain federal funding. The compact demands tuition freezes, restrictions on international student enrollment, and adherence to the administration’s gender definitions. Schools must also avoid policies that could be perceived as hostile to conservative viewpoints. In exchange for compliance, the administration promises “multiple positive benefits,” offering a competitive advantage in securing grants, while threatening consequences for non-compliance.
Read More
The legal ramifications of Charlie Kirk’s assassination are unfolding in court as educators challenge their firings and suspensions. These faculty members claim their First Amendment rights were violated due to social media posts regarding the incident. A federal judge has already ordered the reinstatement of a University of South Dakota professor, while a high school teacher in Iowa is also suing over a similar situation. Experts emphasize that professors have a protected right to speak on public matters, with even offensive political speech, such as rhetorical hyperbole, being safeguarded. Consequently, this burgeoning legal battle is poised to be a significant test case for free speech in the context of political fallout.
Read More
The firing of Tom Alter from Texas State University followed a speech at a socialist conference, and was framed as incitement to violence by the university president. The action came after a video clip, circulated by right-wing influencer Karlyn Borysenko, who has expressed extreme views, including Holocaust denial, was posted online. Borysenko, who has also appeared on Fox News, has been accused of taking a role in this larger crackdown on speech. This instance highlights the escalating role of right-wing influencers in amplifying accusations and influencing outcomes related to academic freedom, while using propaganda to push biased narratives.
Read More
Texas A&M University President Mark A. Welsh III is resigning amidst controversy surrounding a classroom video and the subsequent firing of a professor. The announcement was made by Texas A&M University System Chancellor Glenn Hegar, who cited the need for change without directly referencing the video. The resignation follows criticism from Republican lawmakers after a student objected to a lesson on gender in children’s literature, leading to the professor’s termination. Welsh’s departure also came after he ordered the removal of other faculty and an audit of courses within the system.
Read More
As part of an investigation into alleged antisemitic incidents, UC Berkeley sent the Trump administration the names of 160 faculty members and students, prompting criticism from targeted individuals. According to a letter sent to affected campus members, the university’s lawyers included their names in reports to the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. Judith Butler, a prominent professor at the university, questioned the lack of information regarding the specific allegations and the suspension of standard complaint procedures. Concerns were raised about potential consequences for those on the list, including international students, encompassing employment, academic freedom, and the suppression of political debate.
Read More
Texas A&M University President Mark A. Welsh III announced the removal of the dean and department head overseeing a children’s literature course after a video surfaced showing a student’s objections to LGBTQ-related content. The announcement followed backlash from Republican lawmakers and calls for investigations into the professor’s curriculum. University officials stated that the professor failed to align course materials with the published descriptions. This incident occurred amidst growing political pressure and new legislation giving regents more control over curricula in Texas public universities.
Read More
Northwestern University President Michael Schill announced his resignation Thursday, citing the ongoing federal funding freeze initiated by the Trump administration as a significant challenge. This departure follows a pattern of resignations among university leaders facing criticism and disputes with the federal government, which froze $790 million in funding, demanding changes to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and responding to protests. The university said it had fully cooperated with investigations, and Schill stated he would work with the Board of Trustees to restore the funding for critical research. While the university has updated policies to curb antisemitism, and his resignation comes amid legal battles and other university leadership changes, an interim president has not yet been named.
Read More
Newsom calls Trump’s $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, saying California won’t bow to the pressure. This situation, unfolding with the backdrop of pro-Palestinian protests at UCLA, presents a clear picture of political maneuvering. It seems the Trump administration froze a significant amount of federal funding, nearly $600 million, and then offered a settlement: pay a billion dollars. This certainly sounds like a questionable “deal”. It’s easy to see how this can be construed as an act of attempted political coercion.
This entire scenario evokes a sense of authoritarian tactics, reminding one of actions that are common in places like the Saudi Royal Family or under regimes like Hugo Chavez’s.… Continue reading
The official congressional website, congress.gov, has removed Sections 9 and 10 of Article I from its “Constitution Annotated” resource, raising concerns about the integrity of the document. Section 9, which includes the right to habeas corpus, has been deleted, along with other constitutional protections. This act mirrors former President Trump’s past actions, where he edited out parts of the Constitution that didn’t align with his views, showcasing an assault on the rule of law. This act is a bold step, laying the groundwork for misinformation and making it easier to disregard fundamental rights, despite the law itself remaining unchanged.
Read More
A recent report by the UK-China Transparency (UKCT) think tank indicates that Chinese students at UK universities are being pressured to spy on their classmates, potentially suppressing discussion on sensitive topics. The report highlights the reluctance of some universities to address Chinese interference due to financial reliance on Chinese student fees, despite the new legislation enforcing academic freedom and free speech. Furthermore, the report alleges that some Chinese academics have faced visa denials, family harassment, and intimidation, with topics such as Xinjiang, COVID, and Chinese tech companies being considered sensitive. The Office for Students (OfS) has the power to address threats to free speech, including those from foreign states, and expects universities to exercise scrutiny over any arrangements that may compromise free speech.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood