New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was arrested by ICE agents at an immigration court in Manhattan after requesting a judicial warrant. Lander, who was observing court proceedings, was charged with assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer, a claim disputed by his wife and supporters. Witnesses allege a pattern of deceptive deportations where individuals are misled into believing their cases are dismissed before being immediately apprehended by ICE agents. The arrest has sparked outrage among Lander’s colleagues and advocates, who condemn it as an abuse of power and a threat to democratic processes.
Read More
HuffPost’s commitment to delivering fearless, fact-based journalism spans two decades. Continued support is crucial to sustaining this mission and ensuring the newsroom’s strength. Reader contributions have been instrumental in navigating past challenges and remain vital for the future. This support directly bolsters the newsroom and allows HuffPost to continue its important work. The publication urges readers to contribute again to help secure its future.
Read More
Gavin Newsom’s assessment of Donald Trump as “unhinged” and exhibiting the speech patterns of an “authoritarian” reflects a growing concern about the former president’s actions and rhetoric. The deployment of the National Guard or military without a governor’s consent is a highly unusual and controversial action, especially when invoked under Title 10, a legally ambiguous provision that circumvents the Insurrection Act.
This unprecedented move raises serious questions about the potential for abuse of power. The claim that protestors constitute a “rebellion” against the United States government, justifying the deployment of troops, seems a drastic overreach, especially considering the vast majority of protests are peaceful exercises of free speech.… Continue reading
The deployment of federal troops to Los Angeles, without the request of the state governor, has ignited a firestorm of criticism. This unprecedented action, the first of its kind since the 1960s, is being widely condemned as a blatant overreach of presidential power and a dangerous step towards authoritarianism.
The stark contrast between this deployment and the last time a president federalized a state’s National Guard without a governor’s consent is striking. In 1965, President Johnson deployed the National Guard to protect civil rights activists in Selma, Alabama, directly opposing the governor’s wishes. This time, however, the deployment seems to lack any clear justification beyond a perceived need to quell protests.… Continue reading
Trump is deploying the National Guard under a rarely used power, and that’s raising a lot of eyebrows. It’s a move that feels both unprecedented and eerily familiar, harkening back to a time when such actions were used to quell civil rights movements. The deployment itself seems disproportionate to the situation on the ground, with reports suggesting relatively small-scale protests and minimal violence.
This raises serious questions about the justification for such a heavy-handed response. Why now? Why not during the January 6th insurrection, when there were actual acts of violence and an attack on the Capitol? The contrast is stark and unsettling, hinting at a potential abuse of power.… Continue reading
President Trump directed the Justice Department to investigate Joe Biden, a move unprecedented in US history, based solely on unsubstantiated claims stemming from a past debate. This investigation, lacking evidence of wrongdoing, follows two similar investigations ordered by Trump against former officials Christopher Krebs and Miles Taylor, also without evidence of criminal activity. These actions represent a pattern of using the presidency to target political opponents, raising concerns about abuse of power and the erosion of the rule of law. The lack of public outcry risks normalizing such behavior and emboldening further abuses of presidential authority.
Read More
Former Culpeper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins, convicted of bribery and corruption, received a presidential pardon from Donald Trump before beginning his 10-year sentence. This highly publicized pardon, unlike many historically quiet affairs, followed Jenkins’ public campaign and assertions of innocence. The trend continues with similar pardons granted to Paul Walczak and the Chrisley family, each involving public lobbying and allegations of quid pro quo. This pattern, combined with Trump’s own financial dealings, suggests a normalization of corruption and a perception of impunity for those with wealth or political connections.
Read More
Trump pardoned a tax cheat shortly after the cheat’s mother attended a $1 million fundraising dinner. This event raises serious questions about the nature of the pardon and whether it constituted a blatant quid pro quo exchange. The sheer audacity of the situation is striking; the pardon seemingly came just days after a judge had explicitly rejected the idea that wealth provided a “get-out-of-jail-free card.” The timing alone suggests a connection between the mother’s attendance at the expensive dinner and her son’s subsequent pardon.
This situation highlights a broader pattern of what many perceive as blatant corruption and disregard for the rule of law.… Continue reading
Wesley Donehue, a former staffer for Rep. Nancy Mace, alleges that Mace attempted to leverage nude photos of herself, allegedly obtained by her ex-fiancé Patrick Bryant, to gain full ownership of their shared properties. Bryant denies these accusations and Mace’s claims of non-consensual image capture, stating his only mistake was trusting Mace. Donehue’s deposition casts doubt on Mace’s credibility, suggesting a pattern of using the “victim card” for personal and political advantage. Mace has yet to publicly address the extortion allegations, leaving the matter unresolved within the ongoing civil case.
Read More
Representative Al Green filed articles of impeachment against President Trump, citing the administration’s disregard for judicial authority and separation of powers as primary concerns. Green’s actions follow a previous protest during Trump’s State of the Union address, resulting in his censure by the House. He argues that impeachment is necessary to prevent further escalation of presidential power before a full-blown constitutional crisis arises. Additional articles of impeachment are planned, focusing on other alleged abuses of power. Even without passage, Green intends to continue his efforts.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood