The US Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) plan to rescind Harvard University’s tax-exempt status is a highly controversial move, sparking intense debate and raising serious questions about the potential abuse of power. This action has ignited a firestorm, with many questioning the fairness and legality of targeting a specific institution in this manner. The move feels particularly arbitrary, prompting comparisons to authoritarian regimes that selectively enforce laws against their political opponents.
This potential action is not just about Harvard; it’s about the implications for all non-profit organizations. The concern is that this sets a dangerous precedent, allowing the government to target any entity it deems undesirable, creating a chilling effect on free speech and academic freedom.… Continue reading
A judge has temporarily blocked an order from the former president targeting a law firm, describing the action as a “shocking abuse of power.” This isn’t the first time such accusations have been leveled, and the sheer volume of similar incidents throughout the former president’s tenure suggests this might not be an isolated incident, but rather a pattern of behavior. The extent of the alleged abuse raises concerns about the rule of law and the potential for executive overreach.
The move against the law firm appears to be part of a broader pattern of targeting individuals and organizations perceived as adversaries.… Continue reading
In response to a question regarding the legality of the president’s plan to deport incarcerated criminals, Bondi offered an unsupported assertion that the initiative would decrease crime and that these individuals would face maximum sentencing. However, this plan is likely illegal, violating federal law and potentially several constitutional amendments. The core issue lies in the illegality of deporting U.S. citizens, regardless of their criminal history. Such a plan would require significant legal reform, and is unlikely to be implemented.
Read More
The CEO, a man named DeGiorgio, choked a man on a cruise ship, according to the U.S. It seems the whole incident stemmed from a rather trivial issue: barefoot dancing. DeGiorgio’s wife, it appears, felt strongly enough about the man dancing without shoes that she confronted him.
Her approach, according to reports, involved telling him, “Look, we are all grown-ups here — can you put your shoes on?” This apparently didn’t go over well. The barefoot dancer responded with a rude comment and a middle finger, as captured on security footage. This apparently set off DeGiorgio, leading to him choking the man and uttering death threats.… Continue reading
President Trump dismissed the Senate bill as a Democratic tactic to highlight Republican dissent, asserting it lacked House support and his signature. He criticized unnamed senators for inaction against fentanyl, attributing their perceived failures to “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” Trump urged constituents in Kentucky, Alaska, and Maine to pressure these senators, whom he labeled disloyal to the Republican Party and its leadership. The statement concluded with a familiar appeal to his base, urging them to “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
Read More
Los Angeles-based prosecutor Adam Schleifer was abruptly fired via email from a White House account, reportedly at President Trump’s instruction. The dismissal, allegedly unrelated to Schleifer’s superior, followed an indictment Schleifer helped secure against a major Trump donor, Andrew Wiederhorn. Schleifer’s termination is part of a broader Trump administration purge of federal prosecutors deemed politically disloyal, and follows public criticisms of the President by Schleifer. This action aligns with Trump’s stated goal of removing “Biden-era” appointees and restoring confidence in the justice system.
Read More
In a private call, the President warned auto CEOs against raising prices following his new tariffs, implicitly threatening retribution. This action is viewed as an abuse of power, further undermining the President’s stated goal of rebuilding the nation’s industrial base. The tariffs, including a 25% levy on imported vehicles and parts, are projected to significantly increase auto prices and harm the auto industry. This contradicts the President’s stated aims and undermines the transition to a green future. The President’s actions expose the absurdity of his economic policies.
Read More
Judge Theodore Chuang ruled Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) dismantling of USAID likely violated the Constitution’s separation of powers clause. The court found DOGE’s actions, including the near-complete elimination of USAID’s workforce, contravened Congress’s authority. While the judge declined to reinstate terminated employees due to USAID’s apparent complicity, he prohibited further terminations, record destruction, and unauthorized actions regarding USAID. The order also mandates the restoration of employee access to electronic systems and the potential reoccupation of USAID headquarters.
Read More
President Trump issued a memo revoking the security clearances of numerous political opponents, including former Vice President Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and President Joe Biden. The memo cited a lack of national interest in these individuals accessing classified information, impacting their past access based on previous government roles. This action also targeted Republicans who investigated the January 6th insurrection and several lawyers who have pursued legal actions against Trump. The directive extends to family members and involves rescinding access to classified briefings and potentially other forms of access.
Read More
Kellyanne Conway’s 2017 “Buy Ivanka stuff” comment resulted in warnings from government lawyers regarding ethics violations. However, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s recent “Buy Tesla” endorsement, along with President Trump’s repeated use of the White House to promote private companies, has gone largely unpunished, despite violating a 1989 law prohibiting federal employees from using public office for private gain. This lack of consequence is attributed to the absence of key ethics oversight officials and a perceived decline in public concern for such violations. Experts express worry that this pattern of behavior, unchecked, could lead to widespread corruption.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker