The Trump administration revoked Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, barring the enrollment of future international students and requiring current ones to transfer or face deportation. The Department of Homeland Security cited Harvard’s alleged failure to address claims of anti-American activity and violence on campus, despite Harvard’s denial of these accusations and assertion that the action is unlawful. This decision followed earlier threats and the freezing of federal grants, impacting over 27% of Harvard’s student body. A federal injunction, however, may prevent the immediate deportation of currently enrolled international students.
Read More
Nikki Saroukos, a former NSW police officer, was detained, jailed overnight, and deported from the United States despite holding a valid tourist visa to visit her US Army lieutenant husband in Hawaii. During her visit, she was subjected to invasive searches, interrogations about her past police work, and a night in federal prison, experiencing what she describes as humiliating and criminal treatment. This ordeal, which involved the confiscation of her phone and a forced DNA swab, left her and her mother deeply traumatized and demanding answers. The couple are now considering relocation to Australia to escape further potential issues.
Read More
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated a court order by deporting eight migrants to countries other than their own, including South Sudan, without giving them sufficient opportunity to claim fear of persecution or torture. The administration deported individuals with criminal convictions, despite a prior injunction preventing such deportations to third countries. The judge ordered that the deported individuals be given a reasonable fear interview and the same access to legal counsel they would have had in the U.S. The White House defended its actions, claiming compliance with court orders, while the judge highlighted the migrants’ insufficient notice before deportation and lack of access to legal representation. This ruling follows a similar injunction blocking deportations to Libya.
Read More
During a Senate hearing, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem incorrectly defined habeas corpus as the president’s right to deport individuals, rather than the right of detained persons to challenge their detention. This misunderstanding occurred as the Trump administration considers suspending habeas corpus for immigrants facing deportation. Senator Hassan’s question regarding the definition of habeas corpus prompted Noem’s inaccurate response. Noem’s answer highlights a significant gap in understanding of fundamental legal rights amidst discussions of mass deportations.
Read More
A Honduran mother of three U.S. citizen children faces a $1.82 million fine from ICE for remaining in the U.S. after a 2005 deportation order. The fine, calculated at $500 per day since the order, stems from the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. Her attorney argues the fine is excessive and unfair, citing a lack of proper notification and her client’s eligibility for residency based on long-term residence and family ties. An appeal is planned, challenging both the fine and the denial of a motion to reopen her case.
Read More
The Supreme Court extended a block on the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport individuals, citing insufficient due process afforded to the detainees. The 7-2 decision mandates advance notice and the opportunity to challenge deportation in court, a ruling that angered President Trump, who criticized the Court on social media. While the ruling specifically addresses Venezuelan gang members detained in Texas, similar legal challenges are pending nationwide, potentially halting Trump’s broader deportation efforts. The Supreme Court’s opinion did not address the legality of invoking the Alien Enemies Act itself, leaving that question for lower courts to decide.
Read More
Liyian Páez, a Cuban-American and Trump voter, feels betrayed after her husband, Alían Méndez Aguilar, was deported despite Trump’s campaign promise to deport only criminals. Aguilar, who had a prior deportation order, was detained and deported to Cuba despite being married to Páez and raising her paraplegic son and their young daughter. This deportation leaves Páez struggling financially and emotionally, forcing her to seek government assistance to reunite her family. The family’s separation highlights the human cost of immigration policies and the broken promises felt by those affected.
Read More
Priya Saxena, an Indian national studying in South Dakota, was granted a preliminary injunction preventing her deportation after her student visa was revoked due to a minor traffic infraction from four years prior. Despite this, Saxena successfully completed her master’s and doctorate degrees. The government’s action, part of a broader initiative targeting 1.3 million foreign-born students based on incomplete NCIC data, was deemed unlawful by the court. Saxena’s case highlights concerns regarding the accuracy and fairness of the government’s mass review of student records.
Read More
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem refused to confirm the well-being of Andry Hernández Romero, a gay makeup artist deported to a notorious Salvadoran prison, claiming it falls outside her jurisdiction. Despite a multi-million dollar U.S. agreement with El Salvador to house such detainees, Noem’s assertion contradicts the administration’s acknowledged ability to check on individuals in the facility. Hernández Romero, who passed a credible fear interview for asylum, was deported based on unsubstantiated gang allegations, highlighting a legal battle over “constructive custody.” His case underscores concerns over the Trump administration’s deportation practices and the lack of accountability for those sent to CECOT.
Read More
Nine thousand Afghans who aided the U.S. military in its fight against the Taliban are facing the loss of their deportation protections, a decision attributed to the Trump administration. This action has ignited widespread outrage and concern, highlighting the potential consequences of abandoning those who risked their lives for American interests.
The sheer number of individuals affected—9,000—underscores the scale of this decision. These are not merely statistics; they represent thousands of lives hanging in the balance. Each person represents a family, a community, and a story of bravery and collaboration during a prolonged and challenging conflict. The potential repercussions extend far beyond the immediate impact on these individuals.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood