A judge has denied the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to further delay the discovery process in the Abrego Garcia case. This decision comes after the DOJ was granted a week-long stay just days prior, meaning they now have only five days to comply with the court’s order. While this might seem like a small victory, the judge’s firmness in setting a deadline suggests a possible end to the seemingly endless postponements.
The DOJ’s request for a delay is unsurprising, given the administration’s history of employing delay tactics. The implication is that they require more time to gather and potentially manipulate evidence, a claim fueled by the dubious nature of the initial allegations against Abrego Garcia.… Continue reading
Senator Schumer’s office issued a generic statement condemning the Trump administration’s violation of due process in the Abrego Garcia case, demanding immediate repatriation. Despite prior assertions of “extraordinary action” in response to defiance, the senator’s office has not elaborated on specific plans. This inaction contrasts with the potential for significant Senate obstruction, as demonstrated by individual senators, and represents a missed opportunity for the Democratic leadership to leverage the Senate’s power. The lack of coordinated effort highlights a failure of leadership within the party.
Read More
A federal appeals court, in an opinion penned by conservative Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, has ordered the government to repatriate Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran prison after his illegal deportation. The court rejected the government’s claim that it has no responsibility to retrieve Abrego Garcia, highlighting the violation of due process and the potential for unchecked executive power. Judge Wilkinson’s strong rebuke emphasizes the gravity of the situation and warns of the erosion of the rule of law if the executive branch continues to disregard court orders. This decision, particularly from a judge known for upholding executive authority, serves as a significant warning to the Supreme Court and the nation.
Read More
Senator Warren’s recent condemnation of the Trump administration’s handling of the Abrego Garcia case highlights a critical point: the assertion that the United States does not “disappear people” is demonstrably false. The senator’s strong words, while seemingly straightforward, unveil a far more complex and troubling reality. Her statement acts as a stark counterpoint to the widespread narrative attempting to downplay or dismiss the gravity of the situation.
The Abrego Garcia case itself, while not fully detailed in the available information, serves as a focal point for larger concerns. The narrative surrounding the case, amplified by right-wing media and a significant online presence, paints Abrego Garcia as a dangerous criminal, attempting to shift the focus away from the alleged government overreach.… Continue reading
El Salvador’s denial of Senator Van Hollen’s request to visit Abrego Garcia, a man mistakenly deported and now imprisoned in El Salvador, raises serious questions about the handling of this case. The senator’s account of his meeting with El Salvador’s Vice President highlights a disturbing claim: that the Trump administration is financially supporting El Salvador’s detention of Garcia, despite the lack of evidence linking him to the MS-13 gang. This alleged payment fuels suspicions that Garcia’s imprisonment is politically motivated, rather than based on any legitimate legal grounds.
The implications of this revelation are far-reaching. If true, it exposes a potential violation of international law and fundamental human rights.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s unanimous 9-0 decision ordering the release of a Maryland father, Abrego Garcia, from an El Salvadorian prison is a significant event, raising questions about the Trump administration’s willingness to comply with a Supreme Court order and the potential consequences of defiance. The ruling itself is a clear victory for justice, but the path to securing Garcia’s release and return remains uncertain.
The Supreme Court’s order mandates that the government “facilitate” Garcia’s release and ensure his case proceeds as if he hadn’t been improperly deported. However, the court acknowledged ambiguity in the lower court’s order, potentially exceeding its authority in matters of foreign affairs.… Continue reading
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt referenced President Trump’s suggestion to deport violent U.S. citizens, conditionally stating it must be legal, a point Justice Sotomayor underscored in a dissenting opinion regarding potential unlawful deportations without judicial review. This concern is further highlighted by the Abrego Garcia case, where the government resists correcting a citizen’s erroneous deportation despite admitting error. Constitutional scholars warn of the executive branch’s unchecked power if this position prevails, impacting the scope of presidential authority. The upcoming Supreme Court decision in Abrego Garcia’s case will significantly determine the extent of this power.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker