The Department of Health and Human Services’ reproductiverights.gov website, providing information on reproductive healthcare access, including abortion, went offline around the time of President Trump’s inauguration. The site, active as recently as January 15th, detailed legal protections for reproductive healthcare, contrasting state-level abortion legality with federal protections like Affordable Care Act coverage of contraception. The website’s disappearance follows conflicting statements from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s appointee to lead HHS, regarding abortion policy, and Trump’s own inconsistent stance on the issue. The site’s unavailability raises concerns given the ongoing debate surrounding abortion access in the United States.
Read More
Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled that Idaho, Kansas, and Missouri can proceed with a lawsuit aiming to restrict access to mifepristone. The states seek to limit telehealth prescriptions, shorten the gestational limit for use, and mandate in-person visits, arguing these measures are necessary to uphold state abortion laws. The ACLU criticized the decision, viewing it as an attack on medication abortion. This case follows a previous ruling by Kacsmaryk against mifepristone and comes amidst ongoing efforts by multiple states to further restrict access to abortion pills. The outcome could significantly impact abortion access nationwide.
Read More
Mike Pence’s Advancing American Freedom group opposes Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination for HHS Secretary due to concerns over his past pro-choice statements, despite Kennedy’s recent assurances to pro-life senators. The organization worries Kennedy’s stance on abortion access, including late-term abortions, could undermine pro-life policies and funding. AAF’s skepticism highlights the division within the Republican party over Kennedy’s nomination, with some expressing confidence in his evolving views while others remain unconvinced. This opposition underscores the significant debate surrounding Kennedy’s fitness for the position, given his controversial past statements and lack of relevant expertise.
Read More
A recent study in JAMA Pediatrics reveals a concerning post-Dobbs decision increase in infant mortality rates, particularly among infants with congenital anomalies. This rise, showing a 7% overall increase and a 10% increase in anomaly-related deaths, is attributed to abortion bans preventing terminations of pregnancies with fatal fetal conditions. The study analyzed national CDC data from 2018-2023, highlighting spikes in infant deaths in specific months following the Supreme Court ruling. These findings directly contradict claims that abortion bans protect infant lives, instead demonstrating a tragic and foreseeable consequence of restricted reproductive healthcare access.
Read More
Former Vice President Mike Pence, through his organization Advancing American Freedom, urged Senate Republicans to reject Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination for Secretary of Health and Human Services, citing Kennedy’s pro-choice stance as a departure from the Trump-Pence administration’s pro-life record. This action demonstrates Pence’s willingness to publicly criticize his former running mate, despite congratulating Trump on his recent reelection. The upcoming Senate confirmation hearings will see Indiana Senators Todd Young and Jim Banks voting on the nomination, along with other controversial picks such as Matt Gaetz for Attorney General. Pence’s statement highlights a continuing rift between him and Trump stemming from the January 6th Capitol attack and differing political stances.
Read More
Idaho, a state now known for its strict anti-abortion laws, has become a terrifying place for women facing complex pregnancies. One woman tearfully recounted her experience after being diagnosed with a nonviable pregnancy. Under the state’s total abortion ban, she was forced to carry the pregnancy to term despite knowing her baby would never survive.
The woman’s story highlights the devastating consequences of these extreme laws. She wasn’t alone in her struggle. Many women in Idaho are facing similar agonizing situations. Doctors are afraid to provide necessary care for fear of facing criminal charges, leaving women with no options but to suffer through pregnancies they know will end in the loss of their babies.… Continue reading
Following the announcement of Donald Trump’s re-election, organizations like Aid Access, Plan C, and Wisp saw a surge in demand for their services. Aid Access, which provides abortion pills by mail, received five times the usual number of requests in a single day, while Wisp saw a 300% increase in emergency contraception requests. This surge in demand reflects a widespread fear among women and trans individuals that access to reproductive healthcare could be severely restricted under a second Trump administration. Organizations like Aid Access are determined to continue providing their services despite the uncertainty, emphasizing their commitment to protecting reproductive rights.
Read More
Progressive governors and attorneys general are taking a proactive stance against President-elect Trump’s anticipated policies, mirroring the resistance seen during his first term. States like California, New York, Illinois, and Massachusetts are enacting legislation and mobilizing legal resources to protect vulnerable populations, safeguard environmental regulations, and uphold reproductive rights. This “Trump-proofing” strategy employs state-level laws, lawsuits, and executive actions to counter potential federal overreach. Despite Trump’s improved performance in key blue states and a conservative-leaning judiciary, progressive leaders remain resolute in their opposition, vowing to fight for their constituents and the principles they believe in.
Read More
I can hardly wrap my head around the recent arguments presented by the Missouri Attorney General regarding the abortion pill and its impact on teen pregnancies. To say they’re bizarre would be an understatement. The assertion that the availability of mifepristone will somehow harm the state by lowering teen pregnancies is a perplexing dive into a kind of logic that is hard to comprehend. It’s shocking to see a political figure arguing in favor of more pregnant teens as if that’s the solution to some ill-defined crisis. What are they thinking?
The argument seems to boil down to a starkly utilitarian view of women—they’re seen as vessels for reproduction rather than individuals with agency and rights.… Continue reading
I recently came across a news article that left me utterly disgusted and appalled. The state of California is suing a Catholic hospital for refusing to provide an emergency abortion to a woman whose water broke prematurely, putting her life at risk. The fact that any healthcare provider would prioritize their religious beliefs over the urgent medical needs of a patient is unimaginable to me.
Healthcare providers have a sacred duty to prioritize the well-being and safety of their patients above all else. In this case, the Catholic hospital’s refusal to provide a life-saving emergency abortion is not only unethical but also dangerous.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood