The article highlights the increasing support for abolishing ICE, spurred by the agency’s actions, including the killing of Renee Good in Minneapolis. Despite rising public sentiment, establishment Democrats are hesitant to embrace the “Abolish ICE” movement, instead focusing on incremental reforms and distancing themselves from more progressive stances. Recent polls reveal that a plurality of Americans now support abolishing ICE, with a significant shift in public opinion, suggesting that this stance may be on its way to becoming more mainstream. The author argues that Democrats risk political failure by continuing to avoid this issue, missing an opportunity to differentiate themselves and address the growing concerns about ICE’s role and actions.
Read More
The debate surrounding the future of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has intensified with the introduction of new legislation. A Michigan Democrat is the lead proponent of the “Abolish ICE Act,” which would dismantle the agency and eliminate its enforcement powers. This proposal marks a significant escalation in efforts by Democratic lawmakers to fundamentally alter the structure and function of ICE. The bill’s introduction signals an ongoing push for comprehensive immigration reform on Capitol Hill.
Read More
Following the killing of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE officer, support for abolishing the agency is surging, though Democrats in Congress are primarily focused on reform. Recent polls show a significant increase in public support for abolishing ICE. In response, some Democrats have proposed legislation to limit ICE’s actions and redirect funding to local law enforcement. However, it remains unclear whether these calls for reform will translate into concrete changes, especially with an upcoming appropriations deadline. Democratic leadership has thus far only called for investigations into ICE’s actions.
Read More
The aggressive tactics of ICE agents under the Trump administration have spurred a growing backlash and support for reforming or abolishing the agency. Recent polls indicate a significant portion of Americans believe ICE is making the country less safe and that the agency’s actions are not justified. Nicolle Wallace highlighted the rise in public disapproval, pointing to the visual evidence of violent interactions between agents and civilians, including U.S. citizens, as a key factor. This response, Wallace argued, has transcended partisan divides, reflecting a broader concern about government overreach.
Read More
A recent poll from The Economist and YouGov reveals a shift in public opinion, with 46% of Americans now supporting the abolition of ICE. The survey also indicates that a majority of Americans believe ICE makes them less safe. This change in sentiment has arrived despite warnings from centrist groups cautioning against dismantling ICE, as the agency’s actions, and the concerns surrounding its accountability, have heightened public concern. The core argument for abolishing ICE centers on its threat to American democracy due to its lack of oversight and potential for political weaponization. Therefore, the dismantling of ICE is now viewed as a necessary step to protect democracy.
Read More
Despite the challenges, the goal of achieving consensus on crucial issues like Supreme Court reform is not impossible. However, the article argues that the abolition of ICE must be included in the reconstruction agenda due to its concerning actions as a secret police force. ICE, with its expanded powers, poses a threat by potentially targeting and detaining individuals without proper oversight, representing a pre-made apparatus of control. The article also points out that Trump’s administration’s call for mass deportations aligns with the size of the country’s nonwhite population, raising concerns about the agency’s potential for abuse.
Read More
House Democrat introducing legislation to abolish ICE: ‘Beyond reform’, it appears, is the crux of a conversation sparking a lot of thought. This isn’t just about tweaking the system; it’s about a fundamental shift. The very existence of ICE, according to some, is the problem itself, not the way it’s currently operating. The sentiment is that reform is insufficient and a complete overhaul is necessary.
Now, a lot of the concern here is about the potential for corruption and abuse of power within an organization like ICE. The parallel drawn to the Miami Police Department’s struggles in the 80s highlights the danger of lowering standards and hiring unqualified individuals.… Continue reading
While the “Defund the Police” movement faced political setbacks, “Abolish ICE” may see a different trajectory. ICE’s net approval rating has plummeted, and the agency is increasingly viewed with hostility, in part due to its perceived overreach under the Trump administration. Unlike local police forces, ICE lacks historical support or an emotional connection with the public. With a shift in public sentiment and increasing criticism of ICE’s tactics, Democrats are likely to find political advantage in advocating for reduced funding or the agency’s complete abolition, and possibly with little or no political backlash.
Read More
Democrats should incorporate abolishing ICE into their 2026 platform due to the agency’s controversial actions and the unpopularity of President Trump. Polls indicate significant public support for abolishing ICE, with many Americans viewing the agency as overly aggressive. Despite this opportunity, Democratic leaders have been hesitant to embrace this stance, fearing a “Defund the Police” label. The lack of positive public perception of ICE, combined with reports of misconduct and lavish compensation, provides Democrats with a strong political advantage. The author urges all Democrats to make abolishing ICE a key message, presenting it as a matter of good governance and public safety.
Read More
Polling data reveals a significant shift in American sentiment towards the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. Support for abolishing ICE has reached its highest level since its inception, with 42% now favoring its elimination. This change is largely attributed to the agency’s enforcement tactics under the Trump administration, which have become increasingly controversial and have led to a negative perception of ICE among the public. Approval ratings for Trump’s handling of immigration are also down, while the majority of Americans disapprove of ICE’s methods, indicating a growing public backlash against the agency.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Michigan Democrat Proposes Abolishing ICE, Sparks Debate
The debate surrounding the future of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has intensified with the introduction of new legislation. A Michigan Democrat is the lead proponent of the “Abolish ICE Act,” which would dismantle the agency and eliminate its enforcement powers. This proposal marks a significant escalation in efforts by Democratic lawmakers to fundamentally alter the structure and function of ICE. The bill’s introduction signals an ongoing push for comprehensive immigration reform on Capitol Hill.
Read More