The Department of Justice was caught misrepresenting facts to the 9th Circuit regarding the deployment of federal agents in Portland, with claims dramatically inflating the number of officers present. The DOJ initially stated 115 FPS officers were diverted to Portland, but this was incorrect. After being exposed by the plaintiffs, the DOJ issued a correction, admitting to the error without acknowledging any intent to mislead. This falsehood was a key factor in a panel ruling that authorized Trump’s deployment of the National Guard, which was subsequently overturned by the full 9th Circuit, providing an opportunity for reconsideration based on accurate information.
Read More
In a recent legal battle over the use of National Guard troops, the Trump administration initially secured a win when a 9th Circuit panel stayed a temporary restraining order issued by a U.S. District Judge. However, the victory was short-lived as Oregon attorneys alerted the appellate court to a factual error, revealing the government exaggerated the number of federal officers deployed. The court relied on the inaccurate information, but the 9th Circuit swiftly paused the panel’s stay of the first restraining order. This occurred after the government admitted that the number of troops used was significantly less than originally claimed.
Read More
Judge Jamal Whitehead ordered the Trump administration to admit approximately 12,000 refugees, rejecting the administration’s narrow interpretation of a 9th Circuit appeals court ruling. The administration argued for admitting only 160 refugees, a claim the judge deemed a misrepresentation of the court’s decision. This order stems from a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s suspension of the refugee admissions program, which the judge initially blocked as a nullification of congressional authority. The 9th Circuit partially stayed the initial block, but mandated processing for those with pre-existing travel plans.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker