The assertion that an order shielding the Trump family from IRS audits will remain in place, as stated by Blanche, raises significant questions about fairness and accountability. It’s particularly perplexing when considering the stated reason for such protection – a supposed implication of victimhood. If the Trump family were indeed victims, then the rationale behind shielding them from routine financial scrutiny, a process applied to most individuals and businesses, becomes highly questionable. This protection seems to contradict the very notion of transparency and equal application of the law.
The notion that a settlement is the basis for this shielding, as suggested by the assertion, leads one to ponder the nature of this settlement itself.… Continue reading
The settlement reached by the executive branch requires certification of a legitimate legal claim, a standard this case fails to meet due to perceived collusion between the plaintiff and the government he controls. This action, by suing an IRS answering to him and subsequently agreeing to terms through a Trump appointee, effectively affirmed that the fund’s corpus is not taxable and that Trump receives no economic benefit. Beyond immediate financial considerations, a significant benefit for Trump lies in the official validation of his narrative that January 6 was lawful protest rather than insurrection, a premise woven throughout the fund’s establishment and criteria.
Read More
Three individuals died and over a dozen first responders required assessment and quarantine after responding to a suspected drug overdose in rural New Mexico. Upon entering a residence, first responders were exposed to an unidentified substance, leading to symptoms like nausea and dizziness. While two responders were in serious condition, medical teams decontaminated and released most exposed individuals, confirming the substance was likely transmitted through contact and not airborne. Authorities believe drugs played a role in the deaths, but assured the public there was no ongoing threat.
Read More
As part of the settlement agreement following President Donald Trump’s withdrawal of a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, the agency is permanently barred from conducting any tax audits or pursuing penalties against Trump, his family, and associated businesses for past unpaid taxes. This unprecedented provision, signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, was revealed alongside the creation of a $1.776 billion fund, which critics argue will be used to benefit Trump allies with taxpayer money. The settlement’s terms, which include blocking all future examinations of Trump’s tax affairs, have drawn significant criticism from lawmakers who allege a violation of legal precedents and a gross act of self-dealing by the executive branch.
Read More
A federal judge has stepped in, casting a significant shadow of doubt over Donald Trump’s audacious $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The core of the issue, as articulated by the judge, is a fundamental conflict of interest: how can the President of the United States pursue legal action against government entities that he himself oversees? This isn’t just a technicality; it strikes at the heart of how our legal system is supposed to function.
The judge, Kathleen Williams, brought this concern to the forefront in a recent order, even while denying a request to pause the proceedings for potential settlement discussions.… Continue reading
President Donald Trump has asserted that a lawsuit against the U.S. government, seeking $10 billion, has been “essentially” won, with any awarded funds intended for approved charities. This suit stems from the alleged violation of IRS confidentiality rules concerning the leak of his tax returns, which reportedly showed minimal federal income tax payments in certain years. Trump also mentioned a separate $230 million lawsuit against taxpayers related to the FBI’s search of his Mar-a-Lago home. His claim of winning and his promise to donate the proceeds to charity have drawn criticism, citing his history with the Trump Foundation and allegations of self-dealing.
Read More
President Donald Trump, along with his two eldest sons and the Trump Organization, has filed a lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department. The lawsuit, filed in Miami federal court, alleges that the IRS and Treasury Department failed to prevent the leak of confidential tax information. The plaintiffs are seeking at least $10 billion in damages, claiming the leak was perpetrated by former IRS employee Charles “Chaz” Littlejohn. This legal action follows Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s cancellation of contracts with Booz Allen Hamilton due to Littlejohn’s actions.
Read More
A federal judge has temporarily halted the IRS from sharing taxpayer information with ICE, deeming the practice unlawful. The court’s decision, based on a 94-page ruling, cited violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and several Internal Revenue Code provisions, specifically concerning the disclosure of confidential taxpayer address information. The IRS had already shared information on nearly 47,000 taxpayers in early August, prompting the judge to pause the data-sharing policy. This ruling preliminarily blocks the IRS and Treasury Department from sharing tax return information with the Department of Homeland Security, with some exceptions requiring judicial approval.
Read More
I.R.S. Suspends Free Online Offering to File Taxes Directly
So, the IRS has decided to suspend its free online tax filing service, a move that’s stirring up a lot of frustration and, frankly, a bit of outrage. It seems the service, which allowed taxpayers to file directly with the government without paying for third-party software, won’t be available for the 2025 tax season. The general sentiment is that this is a step backward, and it’s not hard to see why.
Many people are questioning the timing and the reasons behind this decision. There’s a palpable sense that the interests of big tax software companies like TurboTax and H&R Block are being prioritized over the needs of average taxpayers.… Continue reading
The IRS will discontinue its Direct File program after a limited pilot and one full filing season, according to Commissioner Bill Long. This decision aligns with the policy directives within a large spending bill, which allocated resources to research and potentially replace direct e-file programs. Despite positive feedback from users, with 94% rating their experience as “excellent” or “above average,” the program is ending. The IRS is committed to modernizing its operations and will provide transparency regarding tax returns and audits.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker
Judge Blocks IRS from Sharing Taxpayer Data with ICE: A Critique of Enforcement Practices
A federal judge has temporarily halted the IRS from sharing taxpayer information with ICE, deeming the practice unlawful. The court’s decision, based on a 94-page ruling, cited violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and several Internal Revenue Code provisions, specifically concerning the disclosure of confidential taxpayer address information. The IRS had already shared information on nearly 47,000 taxpayers in early August, prompting the judge to pause the data-sharing policy. This ruling preliminarily blocks the IRS and Treasury Department from sharing tax return information with the Department of Homeland Security, with some exceptions requiring judicial approval.
Read More