A recent 60 Minutes exposé detailed Donald Trump’s campaign of retribution against major law firms. Trump’s executive orders, aimed at firms representing his opponents, have been described as an assault on the legal profession, with some firms facing financial repercussions and others pressured into pro bono work for the administration. A federal judge deemed one such order unconstitutional, while lawyers involved have likened Trump’s actions to mob tactics and bribery. The segment also revealed that Paramount, 60 Minutes’ parent company, faced pressure to temper criticism of Trump, leading to the departure of the show’s longtime chief.
Read More
This Sunday, 60 Minutes will air a segment criticizing President Trump’s intimidation tactics against law firms, despite being embroiled in a legal battle with him. The segment highlights Trump’s use of executive orders to target firms he accuses of “weaponizing” the justice system. This action comes amidst the recent departure of 60 Minutes’ executive producer, Bill Owens, who cited CBS’s alleged pandering to Trump and interference with editorial independence. The president, meanwhile, has declared his lawsuit against 60 Minutes and CBS a “true WINNER,” claiming fraud. The timing of the segment is particularly noteworthy given Paramount Global’s pending merger requiring presidential approval.
Read More
Scott Pelley, in a “60 Minutes” broadcast, criticized Paramount’s increased content oversight, linking it to the company’s pursuit of a merger requiring Trump administration approval. This oversight, Pelley explained, prompted executive producer Bill Owens’ resignation, as Owens felt it compromised the show’s journalistic independence. Pelley defended Owens’ actions, highlighting his commitment to accurate and fair reporting, even on controversial topics like the Trump administration and the Israel-Gaza conflict. The situation underscores concerns about potential interference in editorial decisions driven by business considerations.
Read More
President Trump’s amended lawsuit against CBS and Paramount Global now seeks $20 billion in damages, doubling his original claim, alleging deceptive editing of a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris to boost her election prospects. The suit, which now includes Trump’s former doctor as a plaintiff to keep the case in Texas, shifts away from First Amendment arguments, focusing instead on alleged business motivations behind the alleged manipulation. The FCC’s release of unedited interview footage supports CBS’s claim of accurate reporting, yet the lawsuit accuses CBS of making Harris appear more coherent to improve commercial appeal. Preliminary settlement talks between Paramount and Trump’s team are underway, with Trump reportedly seeking a substantial settlement.
Read More
Bill Owens resigned as executive producer of 60 Minutes, citing an inability to maintain independent decision-making amid pressure from Donald Trump’s attacks and a lawsuit against CBS. This decision follows Trump’s targeting of the show and ongoing settlement talks, fueled by concerns about jeopardizing Paramount Global’s merger with Skydance. Owens’ departure comes amidst staff anxiety and fears of compromising journalistic integrity, with some viewing the situation as a retreat from First Amendment principles. CBS News leadership expressed gratitude for Owens’ contributions, affirming their commitment to 60 Minutes’ mission.
Read More
In response to Sunday’s “60 Minutes” broadcast featuring segments on Ukraine and Greenland, President Trump launched a scathing attack on the program, demanding the FCC impose significant penalties for what he deemed unlawful and defamatory coverage. This follows Trump’s ongoing $20 billion lawsuit against the network, which alleges biased editing of a Kamala Harris interview, a claim CBS denies. The FCC has already initiated an investigation into this matter, alongside several other probes into various news organizations. Despite the legal battles, “60 Minutes” continues its critical coverage of the Trump administration.
Read More
Donald Trump condemned CBS’s “60 Minutes,” demanding “maximum fines and punishment” for what he deemed dishonest reporting. His outrage stemmed from segments featuring interviews with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, who refuted Trump’s claims about the war, and Greenlanders who criticized Trump’s pursuit of Greenland’s annexation. Trump called for CBS to lose its license and urged FCC Chair Brendan Carr to impose substantial penalties. He characterized the network’s actions as “unlawful and illegal behavior.”
Read More
Following a “60 Minutes” report on USAID, Elon Musk accused the program of deceptive editing and election interference, calling for its staff to face prison sentences. This follows President Trump’s own call for the show’s termination, stemming from a lawsuit alleging deceptive editing of a Vice President Harris interview. CBS maintains the edits were truthful and informative, and recently released unedited footage. The network is reportedly considering a settlement, despite internal concerns about potential further legal repercussions. Musk’s attack further escalates the ongoing conflict between the Trump administration and CBS.
Read More
Donald Trump’s lawsuit against CBS and subsequent FCC investigation, stemming from a *60 Minutes* interview with Kamala Harris, are baseless. The released transcript fully refutes Trump’s claims of “election interference” and journalistic misconduct, revealing his accusations to be a misrepresentation of standard editing practices. CBS’s editing of Harris’s response to a question about Israel involved using a more concise portion of her answer, not replacing it with a fabricated one. The FCC’s consideration of the complaint is a concerning abuse of power, driven by Trump’s personal vendetta and a questionable interpretation of broadcast regulations.
Read More
The FCC’s release of the full transcript and video of Kamala Harris’s ’60 Minutes’ interview has sparked a firestorm of commentary, much of it focusing on the perceived hypocrisy of the situation. The release itself seems, to many, a strange use of agency resources, particularly given the existing concerns about potential news distortion across the media landscape. This isn’t just about the Harris interview; it’s about a broader question of fairness and consistency in how news is scrutinized.
The central controversy revolves around the FCC’s investigation into whether the ’60 Minutes’ interview was edited in a way that constitutes “news distortion.”… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood