President-elect Trump’s suggestion of using force or economic coercion to acquire Greenland from Denmark has sparked outrage in Europe and Greenland. Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte B. Egede firmly rejected this proposal, stating that Greenland’s people desire neither Danish nor American rule, but rather self-determination. Despite this, the Danish Prime Minister viewed the heightened interest in Greenland as potentially beneficial for its independence movement. Trump’s actions, including his son’s visit and alleged attempts to influence Greenlandic citizens, have further intensified the controversy.
Read More
Following a legal challenge, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected efforts to block the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This report, focusing on the January 6th events, was part of a broader investigation also encompassing the handling of classified documents. While the court’s decision allows for release, Judge Cannon’s three-day delay remains in effect, potentially leaving room for further appeals before the January 20th inauguration. Trump’s legal team plans to appeal, aiming to prevent its release until he assumes office.
Read More
NATO has assumed command of Polish air defenses from the US, a transition intended to ensure continued support for Ukraine despite uncertainties surrounding the incoming Trump administration’s policies. This shift, part of a months-long effort, transfers responsibility for aiding Ukraine’s war effort from the US to European allies. The move safeguards crucial logistical nodes in Poland, vital for delivering aid to Ukraine. A final $500 million US military aid package was announced before the handover, alongside concerns over the future of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group.
Read More
Trump’s talk of retaking the Panama Canal, once dismissed as mere bluster, has surprisingly materialized into a GOP-sponsored bill. This unexpected development raises significant questions about the party’s priorities and the potential consequences of such a bold, and arguably reckless, proposal.
The very idea of a bill aiming to reacquire the Panama Canal, based solely on the pronouncements of a single individual, seems almost surreal. It underscores a concerning trend within the GOP of prioritizing the whims of a particular leader over established foreign policy and international relations. The fact that this is even being considered in Congress reflects a level of political dysfunction that should worry anyone concerned about the stability of the United States’ position on the world stage.… Continue reading
In response to Donald Trump’s suggestion of annexing Canada via “economic force” to pressure Ottawa on border security, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau framed the annexation talk as a distraction tactic from the significant economic repercussions of proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports. These tariffs, Trudeau argued, would drastically increase the cost of various goods for American consumers. While reiterating Canada’s unwavering stance against annexation, Trudeau also warned of potential retaliatory tariffs mirroring past actions against specific US products to protect Canadian interests. The ultimate goal, however, remains the avoidance of such measures to minimize harm to both nations.
Read More
Former President Trump falsely blamed California Governor Newsom for wildfires raging near Los Angeles, claiming Newsom prioritized a small fish over water for fire hydrants by refusing a nonexistent water agreement. This assertion is inaccurate; the dispute concerned water allocation in the San Francisco Bay Delta, a separate issue from Los Angeles’ water supply. The wildfires resulted from drought, high winds, and prior development decisions, not water management related to the smelt. Trump’s comments demonstrate a disregard for factual accuracy and a politicization of a natural disaster.
Read More
Unless substantial new U.S. aid is provided, Ukraine will likely face complete defeat and Russian control within the next 12-18 months. This presents a significant challenge for President-elect Trump, who previously promised a swift resolution to the conflict but now faces a reality where Putin seeks Ukraine’s complete capitulation. Trump must choose between accepting a humiliating global defeat or redoubling U.S. support for Ukraine, a decision impacting both Ukraine’s fate and the success of his presidency. Putin believes he is on the verge of victory and is unlikely to negotiate unless his military position changes drastically. A Russian victory would entail the complete eradication of Ukrainian independence and identity, resulting in widespread suffering and repression.
Read More
Biden is reportedly planning to implement new sanctions against Russia before the end of his term, a move generating significant online discussion. The timing of these sanctions, so close to a potential Trump return to power, has sparked intense debate about their effectiveness and political implications.
Many express frustration with this late-stage action, arguing that stronger, earlier sanctions could have yielded better results. The sentiment reflects a widespread belief that the current measures are largely symbolic, destined to be reversed by a Trump administration. This perceived futility fuels cynicism and underlines the ongoing frustration with the perceived slow pace of action against Russia.… Continue reading
Following President-elect Trump’s repeated assertions that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state, coupled with threats of economic force, Canadian officials have shifted from dismissing the comments as jokes to acknowledging the seriousness of the situation. Ministers LeBlanc and Joly emphasized the need to take Trump’s words seriously, while Premier Furey highlighted the unacceptable nature of threatening Canadian sovereignty. Despite strong pushback from Canadian leaders, including Prime Minister Trudeau, Trump continues to reiterate his desire to absorb Canada, using social media and press conferences to spread this message.
Read More
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Trump regarding a former law clerk’s job application, a conversation that occurred before Trump filed an emergency appeal to delay his sentencing. Alito stated the call did not involve Trump’s pending case or any other matter before the Supreme Court. While recommending former clerks for positions is common, this instance is notable given the timing and the potential for criticism regarding the Court’s independence. The call has already drawn renewed scrutiny of Alito’s conduct.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood