This site uses cookies, along with partner sites, to enhance functionality, analyze usage, personalize ads, and track ad performance. User consent is implied through site use. Detailed information on cookie management and policies is available via a linked cookie policy. By continuing, users acknowledge and accept this cookie usage.
Trump ‘can’t guarantee’ Americans won’t pay more if tariffs enacted. This statement, while seemingly simple, encapsulates a complex economic reality that many seem to be overlooking. The core issue is straightforward: tariffs, by their very nature, increase the cost of imported goods. This isn’t some debatable point; it’s a fundamental principle of how tariffs function.
Adding a tariff, essentially a tax on imported products, doesn’t magically disappear. The added cost isn’t absorbed by the seller, who’s already operating within their profit margin. It’s almost always passed on to the consumer, resulting in higher prices for everyday goods. This is true regardless of whether the ultimate goal is to boost domestic production.… Continue reading
In a previously unannounced meeting in Paris on December 7th, Ukrainian President Zelensky met with U.S. President-elect Trump and French President Macron. The 35-minute discussion at the Elysee Palace focused on the situation in Ukraine and achieving a just peace, with Zelensky emphasizing the importance of a “peace through strength” approach. This trilateral meeting, occurring amidst the Notre Dame Cathedral reopening, marked Zelensky and Trump’s first in-person encounter since the U.S. election. Zelensky expressed gratitude for the “productive and meaningful” discussion and Trump’s resolute stance.
Following his “Patriot of the Year” award from Fox News, Trump announced plans to address election integrity, focusing on implementing paper ballots, one-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship. This renewed focus on election reform, despite his November victory and the statistical rarity of widespread voter fraud, suggests a continued pursuit of his 2020 election fraud claims. His comments specifically targeted California’s voting system, which doesn’t mandate photo ID at polling places.
Ocasio-Cortez’s pursuit of a House position that would pit her directly against Trump is a strategic move with significant implications. It positions her as the leading voice of opposition to Trump, a role many believe she’s already effectively filled. This calculated move is fueled by a growing recognition that she embodies the future of the Democratic Party, a future many see as essential for the party’s continued viability.
The ambition behind her bid is clear; to serve as the primary counterpoint to Trump’s influence and rhetoric. This would involve actively investigating and challenging his actions and statements, putting her at the forefront of the battle against what many perceive as a dangerous and divisive political figure.… Continue reading
Efforts by Trump to circumvent the Senate’s “advice and consent” role in confirming appointments are unconstitutional. Proposed methods, including using recess appointments during a manufactured Senate recess or employing the president’s power to adjourn Congress, are legally flawed and contradict established constitutional interpretations and historical precedent. These schemes would represent an abuse of power, undermining the checks and balances integral to American self-governance. The Senate’s refusal to cooperate and potential judicial intervention would be crucial in preventing such an autocratic maneuver. Such actions are not only unlawful but fundamentally disrespectful of the Constitution.
The potential cancellation of the US Postal Service’s contract for electric mail trucks by former President Trump is generating significant buzz, and understandably so. This isn’t just about a change of vehicles; it touches upon broader questions of presidential power, economic policy, and environmental concerns.
The whispers of a cancellation are particularly intriguing given that the original contract was awarded to build these EVs in the United States, specifically in states that voted for Trump. This seemingly contradicts his stated commitment to American jobs and manufacturing. It suggests a willingness to disregard existing commitments for reasons that remain unclear.
The independence of the USPS itself is also a key element here.… Continue reading
Trump’s F.B.I. pick, Kash Patel, has openly declared a list of political opponents he intends to target. The sheer existence of this “enemies list” raises serious concerns about the weaponization of the FBI under a potential Trump administration. This isn’t simply about partisan politics; it’s about the potential for abuse of power on a massive scale.
The idea of preemptive pardons, specifically for those on Patel’s list, is a complex one. While it might seem like a radical solution, it’s a direct response to a situation that demands drastic measures. A blanket pardon could be seen as an admission of guilt by those pardoned, and might not even deter a determined administration hellbent on retribution.… Continue reading
Lance Wallnau, a close Trump ally and Christian nationalist, is less concerned about the numerous scandals surrounding Trump’s Defense Secretary nominee, Pete Hegseth, than he is about the public disclosure of those scandals. This reflects the broader Christian nationalist movement’s strategy, which aims to concentrate power in the presidency to bypass Congress and impose a far-right Christian worldview on the nation. Key appointments, such as Russell Vought to the OMB, are central to this plan, aiming to replace federal employees with Christian nationalists. The ultimate goal is to fundamentally reshape American governance according to this theocratic ideology, potentially with dire consequences for democratic institutions and civil liberties.
Tucker Carlson’s recent Moscow interview with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov served as a platform for promoting the Kremlin’s narrative on the Ukraine conflict, emphasizing the risk of a global nuclear crisis if the U.S. continues its support. However, Kremlin insiders suspect a secondary motive: Carlson acting as a messenger, relaying messages between Putin and Trump regarding potential future negotiations. This interview, timed strategically amidst heightened Russian nuclear threats, allowed Lavrov to deflect accusations and avoid challenging questions from Carlson, who consistently framed the conversation around the specter of nuclear war. Ultimately, Carlson’s interview failed to produce any significant revelations but effectively amplified Russia’s desired message.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood