President Trump, citing the USPS’s $9.5 billion fiscal year loss and substantial liabilities, has expressed interest in privatization. Discussions with his commerce secretary nominee, Howard Lutnick, indicate a potential overhaul impacting hundreds of thousands of federal employees and potentially disrupting shipping and supply chains. This plan, though lacking specifics, follows previous conflicts with the agency, including attempts to shift key functions to the Treasury Department. Despite its recent financial struggles, the USPS remains a highly-regarded institution with a long history and a recent success in handling mail-in ballots.
Read More
Bringing down grocery prices, a key promise made during his campaign, is now acknowledged by Trump as a significantly challenging undertaking. He’s shifted from confident assertions of easily achievable price reductions to admitting the task will be “very hard.” This stark reversal highlights the complexities of economic policy and raises questions about the feasibility of his past pronouncements.
The difficulty, as he now explains, stems from the fact that prices have already risen, making any downward adjustment a much steeper climb than initially portrayed. It’s not simply a matter of flipping a switch; the economic forces at play are significantly more intricate.… Continue reading
Kash Patel’s nomination as FBI director has raised concerns among former FBI officials due to his lack of experience and potential for unchecked power. With Republican support secured and the current director’s impending resignation, Patel’s confirmation is highly likely. Former officials warn that this could lead to partisan investigations, manipulation of background checks, and access to sensitive files, all without the typical oversight mechanisms. Patel’s close ties to Trump and shared distrust of the FBI exacerbate these concerns, potentially jeopardizing the bureau’s integrity and operational effectiveness.
Read More
Trump eyes privatizing the U.S. Postal Service, citing its financial losses. This isn’t a new idea, and it’s fueled by a long-standing debate about the Postal Service’s role in a modern economy. The argument often centers around the fact that it’s not a for-profit entity, and therefore shouldn’t be judged solely on its financial performance in the same way a private corporation would be. Many argue that the USPS provides a vital service to the entire nation, and that its worth extends far beyond simple profitability.
The claim of financial losses is often used as justification for privatization. However, a significant portion of these losses can be attributed to a Congressional mandate from 2006 that required the Postal Service to pre-fund its retiree health care benefits 75 years in advance—a unique and exceptionally burdensome requirement not imposed on any other entity.… Continue reading
Despite spending tens of millions of dollars on anti-transgender campaign ads, President-elect Trump now claims the bathroom debate is unimportant, affecting a “very small number of people.” He suggests the Supreme Court should decide the issue and agrees with Rep.-elect Sarah McBride that other matters warrant congressional attention. Trump’s recent statements directly contradict his campaign’s aggressive rhetoric targeting transgender individuals, particularly in ads falsely portraying Democratic nominee Kamala Harris’s stance on gender-affirming care. He now asserts his support for fair treatment of all people, irrespective of majority or minority status.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s team is actively pursuing a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict, engaging with Ukrainian and White House officials, though a concrete peace plan remains absent. While Trump publicly advocates for peace and has communicated with Zelenskyy, the extent of communication with Putin and the feasibility of securing Russian cooperation are unclear. Challenges persist, including Russia’s battlefield gains and potential unwillingness to concede, while Trump’s team may propose concessions such as delaying Ukraine’s NATO membership to facilitate negotiations. The Biden administration, however, expressed concern over such concessions.
Read More
Despite previous claims of lowering grocery prices, Trump acknowledges the difficulty in reversing price increases. He cites improved energy supply and supply chain fixes as potential solutions, pointing to congested ports as evidence of ongoing supply chain issues. However, his proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods, major sources of US fruits and vegetables, directly contradict this goal and will likely raise consumer prices. This suggests a disconnect between Trump’s stated objectives and the likely consequences of his economic proposals.
Read More
Donald Trump’s repeated refusal to disclose whether he has spoken with Vladimir Putin, citing inappropriateness, contrasts sharply with his willingness to publicize conversations with other world leaders. This pattern began in 2016 and continued through his first presidency, with reports alleging undisclosed communications even after leaving office. Trump’s recent claim that he “can’t” discuss potential conversations with Putin further fuels concerns about the nature of their relationship. This secrecy stands in stark contrast to his public boasting about interactions with other foreign leaders.
Read More
Donald Trump repeatedly promised to lower grocery prices, attributing this pledge to his election victory, despite the complexity of food pricing. He now claims lowering prices is difficult, contradicting his previous assertion of a simple solution. This reversal reveals the unsubstantiated nature of his promise, which ignored factors like supply chain issues and corporate profits. Ultimately, Trump’s pledge was a deceptive campaign tactic, leaving voters disillusioned and potentially accepting perpetually high food costs as the “new normal”.
Read More
Trump’s reported plan to discuss ending childhood vaccination programs with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is deeply concerning. The potential ramifications of such a decision are immense, and the implications extend far beyond political rhetoric. The very idea of dismantling established vaccination programs is alarming, given the proven effectiveness of these programs in preventing numerous debilitating and deadly diseases.
This proposed discussion raises serious questions about the prioritization of public health. The potential consequences of reduced vaccination rates are readily apparent: a resurgence of preventable diseases, leading to widespread illness, disability, and death among children. This isn’t a theoretical risk; historical data clearly demonstrates the devastating impact of such outbreaks.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood