President-elect Trump strongly condemned President Biden’s commutation of sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, vowing to vigorously pursue capital punishment upon his inauguration. Trump criticized the commutations as senseless and disrespectful to victims’ families, intending to focus on cases involving violent criminals. While the extent of his actions remains unclear, his statement suggests a more assertive approach to federal death penalty cases than previous administrations. Experts note that enacting significant changes to death penalty policy faces substantial legal and practical challenges.
Read More
Despite campaigning as proponents of free speech, President-elect Trump and his allies, including potential appointees Patel, Kennedy, and Musk, are exhibiting actions contradictory to this claim. Their rhetoric and proposed actions target the free press and those critical of the administration, suggesting a willingness to silence dissent rather than champion it. This includes threats against journalists, media outlets, and even potential primary challenges for dissenting politicians. A conservative lawyer familiar with the plans warns of a “brutal” crackdown on dissent. The notion of Trump as a free speech advocate is therefore demonstrably false.
Read More
Trump’s campaign refusal to pay nearly $50,000 in bills incurred during Grand Rapids rallies is, frankly, unsurprising. This isn’t a new development; it’s consistent with a long-standing pattern of behavior, a pattern so well-established that anyone extending credit to his campaigns without upfront payment seems, well, naive at best.
The nearly $33,000 bill from the July rally, largely for police overtime and public works, went unpaid despite being due in October. This is incredibly frustrating for Grand Rapids, especially since the city’s resources, and ultimately taxpayer money, are now tied up in this unpaid debt. It’s hard to imagine a business operating under the same financial principles; the idea of a large-scale operation not fulfilling its financial obligations raises significant concerns about accountability.… Continue reading
President-elect Trump threatened the European Union with tariffs unless it significantly increases purchases of U.S. oil and gas, citing a $209 billion trade deficit. This demand, while unclear on specifics, follows previous attempts to boost U.S. energy exports to Europe. However, the EU lacks a central authority to fulfill such large-scale commitments, and experts suggest this is likely posturing for future trade negotiations. Despite a substantial trade imbalance, the relationship is complex, with significant intra-company flows of goods obscuring the full picture. The feasibility of Trump’s demands is questionable given existing energy market dynamics and the inability to mandate purchases.
Read More
In December, the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index plummeted 8.1 points to 104.7, falling below expectations and marking a sharp reversal from the previous two months. This decline was largely driven by a 12.6-point drop in the Expectations Index to a five-month low of 81.1, nearing the recessionary threshold of 80. Consumer concerns cited included political uncertainty and the anticipated impact of tariffs on the cost of living, outweighing any potential job creation benefits. The significant drop in consumer confidence is reflected in Walmart’s stock decline, prompting speculation of an impending recession.
Read More
This article is protected by copyright © 2024 Fortune Media IP Limited. Use is governed by their Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The FORTUNE trademark is registered, and the site may contain affiliate links. Note that offers are subject to change.
Read More
Trump vows to rename Denali as Mount McKinley, a move that has sparked considerable controversy and highlights a clash between historical precedent, Alaskan identity, and political posturing. The proposed change reverts the mountain’s official name, designated as Denali in 1975 by the state of Alaska, back to its former name, Mount McKinley. This decision, widely seen as a purely symbolic gesture, is fueled by motivations far exceeding a simple name change.
The renaming is perceived by many as a deliberate attempt to undermine the Obama administration’s legacy, with the implication being that reversing this decision is a direct “stick it to” Obama moment.… Continue reading
At a Phoenix rally, President-elect Trump dismissed claims that Elon Musk is usurping his power, citing Musk’s South African birth as disqualifying him from the presidency. Trump also discussed his desire for a meeting with Vladimir Putin, his plan to address Panama Canal fees, and a new anti-drug advertising campaign. He further addressed the recent near-government shutdown, implying a shared interest with Musk despite media speculation of a rift. Despite this, Trump and his allies downplayed any conflict between him and Musk, emphasizing Musk’s role in reducing government waste and his financial contributions to the Trump campaign.
Read More
Trump’s suggestion to retake the Panama Canal if transit fees aren’t lowered is a dramatic escalation, raising eyebrows internationally. The statement itself is startling, given the implications of unilaterally seizing another nation’s sovereign territory. It suggests an approach to international relations that prioritizes aggressive unilateral action over diplomacy and negotiation.
This action, if implemented, would be a clear violation of international law and norms, potentially triggering significant diplomatic backlash and jeopardizing US relations with numerous countries. Beyond the legal ramifications, such a move could severely damage America’s standing in the global community, undermining its credibility and leadership.
The claim seemingly stems from a dispute over transit fees, implying a belief that the US has some inherent right to influence or control these prices.… Continue reading
Trump’s recent statement regarding continued military support for Ukraine has sparked a wave of skepticism and speculation. The announcement itself, promising continued aid, presents a rather intriguing contrast to his past rhetoric and actions. It’s hard not to approach such a declaration with a healthy dose of doubt given his history of unpredictable pronouncements and frequent shifts in policy.
The timing of this announcement is also noteworthy. It could be interpreted as an olive branch extended to Europe and Ukraine, potentially aiming to counter Russian influence and solidify alliances. However, it’s equally plausible to see it as a calculated move, perhaps intended to appease certain segments of the population or leverage the situation for personal gain.… Continue reading