Senate votes to curb military action in Venezuela in rare Trump rebuke, and it’s certainly a topic that’s sparked a lot of conversation, and for good reason. It’s not every day you see a significant rebuke of a President, especially on matters of foreign policy and the use of military force. This vote seems to have been met with a mix of reactions, ranging from cautious optimism to outright skepticism about its ultimate impact. The fact that this was a bipartisan effort, with Democrats and a small number of Republicans joining forces, speaks volumes about the level of concern in the Senate.… Continue reading
On Thursday, the Senate voted to prevent President Trump from further military action in Venezuela, following his authorization of a strike that captured the country’s leader. The War Powers Resolution, requiring congressional approval for future military deployments, passed with a vote of 52-47, supported by several Republicans. The measure, introduced by Senators Kaine and Paul, now proceeds to the House. Trump criticized the five Republican senators who voted in favor of the measure, expressing his disapproval.
Read More
Following a Senate vote advancing a War Powers Resolution to limit presidential authority regarding Venezuela, former President Donald Trump criticized the Republican senators who voted with the Democrats, specifically naming Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young. The resolution, which signals disapproval of potential military action, is unlikely to become law due to needing approval from the Republican-controlled House and Trump’s signature. The senators who voted in favor of the resolution justified their support by citing concerns about potential long-term military involvement and the need for congressional authorization for future deployments.
Read More
Senate to vote next week to block Trump’s military action against Venezuela, that’s the headline, and honestly, it’s hard not to feel a sense of… well, let’s call it *underwhelmed* by the timing. A week? Really? It feels a little like announcing a plan to close the barn door a good while after the horse has not only bolted, but possibly set up shop in a neighboring country. The overall sentiment seems to be that this is a case of too little, too late. The general consensus, from what I gather, is that Congress, or at least the Senate, appears to be moving at a glacial pace, especially when dealing with matters of potential military intervention.… Continue reading
In an effort to expedite his legislative agenda, Donald Trump has advocated for ending the Senate filibuster, arguing it hinders effective governance and could prevent future government shutdowns. He believes eliminating the filibuster would enable Republicans to pass key priorities, including healthcare reform. Trump’s push comes as the Republican party holds a narrow Senate majority, leaving little room for error in passing legislation. This stance is seen as a way to circumvent potential gridlock and focus on economic issues, particularly “pricing,” which he believes will resonate with voters in the upcoming midterm elections.
Read More
The Senate failed to pass either the Democratic or Republican plans to prevent rising healthcare costs under the Affordable Care Act. The Democratic proposal sought to extend subsidies, while the Republican alternative aimed to fund health savings accounts. Both plans failed due to the Senate’s filibuster rule, which requires 60 votes to advance legislation. Despite the failure, the next major legislative deadline is January 30, when a new bill funding the government must be passed.
Read More
House unanimously passes repeal of phone records provision that could enrich senators, and it immediately sets off a flurry of reactions, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of news that, at first glance, feels straightforward – a good thing! – but then the details start to surface, and suddenly, you’re wading through a swamp of potential conflicts of interest and political maneuvering. The fact that the House unanimously agreed to repeal a provision that could line the pockets of senators – essentially, a provision that could allow senators to profit from lawsuits related to phone records – immediately raises eyebrows. Shouldn’t this have been a no-brainer from the start?… Continue reading
House Speaker Mike Johnson, after initially opposing and delaying the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, voted in favor of the bill following pressure from former President Trump. Despite his support, Johnson expressed disappointment with the Senate’s swift approval of the bill without amendments, citing concerns about potential victim identification. The speaker had anticipated Senate amendments, based on prior conversations with Senate leaders, but those hopes were dashed when the bill passed with overwhelming support. Ultimately, the bill’s passage appears imminent, with Trump expected to sign it into law, despite Johnson’s continued reservations about its contents.
Read More
Senate unanimously approves bill to force release of Epstein files. It’s almost unbelievable, isn’t it? The Senate, in a seemingly unprecedented move, has unanimously agreed to a bill requiring the Justice Department to release all unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein. And it’s already heading to President Trump’s desk for his signature. The speed of this process is truly head-spinning. One minute, it feels like this issue is buried, and the next, there’s a flurry of action.
This is where the skepticism kicks in, and it’s warranted. The speed at which this is happening definitely raises eyebrows. It’s almost too convenient.… Continue reading
Following the House’s overwhelming vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the Senate swiftly passed the legislation through unanimous consent. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer spearheaded the effort, aiming to compel the Justice Department to release the Epstein files. This quick passage, without amendments, came despite initial Republican resistance and concerns from House Speaker Mike Johnson about victim protection and potential release of sensitive information. The bill now heads to President Trump’s desk for signature, completing a legislative process marked by rapid shifts and procedural maneuvers.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker