Republican lawmakers grow alarmed over signs of 2026 election wipeout is what they should be. It’s almost comical how they’re just now getting worried. Many are pointing to the “shit show” they’ve created as the main catalyst for their potential downfall. There’s a prevailing sentiment that the Republican party’s actions, policies, and overall direction have led them to this point.
The constant criticism of Democrats’ inability to solve healthcare costs seems a little disingenuous considering their own actions. Some see this as a game, pointing to potential irregularities in voting machines. The consensus is that Republicans are just bad at governing, especially when they lean into what is seen by many as fascist policies and protecting those that have done wrong.… Continue reading
The GOP’s efforts to manipulate the 2026 midterm elections through gerrymandering have encountered setbacks. A Texas gerrymander, designed to add five seats, was blocked by a panel of judges, and Republicans in Indiana lack the votes to redraw their congressional map. Despite these challenges, the situation remains fluid, as the Texas decision is being appealed and Republicans have secured additional seats elsewhere. Democrats are also working to gain seats. An interview with Heather Williams provides insights into the obstacles, potential positive outcomes for Democrats, and the importance of voter participation in state-level contests.
Read More
The Indiana state Senate will not be holding its planned December session to vote on redistricting, according to Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray, due to a lack of support. This decision, influenced by pressure from the White House, diminishes the likelihood of redistricting the state’s congressional maps before the 2026 midterm elections. Despite a supermajority in both legislative chambers, Indiana Republicans have faced internal opposition to the idea of gerrymandering, with some citing potential political backfire and ethical concerns. This marks the second Republican-led state to resist the push for redistricting, following similar actions in Kansas, as Republicans aim to create new maps that favor their party in the upcoming elections.
Read More
AP News reports that the Justice Department filed a lawsuit to block California’s newly approved congressional district boundaries, joining a legal challenge that could influence the 2026 U.S. House elections. The suit, filed in response to a map proposed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, accuses California of racial gerrymandering. This marks the first time the Justice Department has sued over mid-decade House map revisions designed to maximize partisan advantage, amidst similar actions in other states like Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina. The outcome of the legal battle, fueled by Proposition 50, could significantly impact the balance of power in the House, with Democrats aiming to gain seats.
Read More
A recent report revealed that Trump’s election integrity official suggested invoking a “national emergency” to justify a federal takeover of state-run election processes for the 2026 election. This proposal comes amidst concerns from voting rights advocates, particularly given the elevation of election deniers within the administration. These individuals, who have pushed false claims of voter fraud, are reportedly aiming to influence election rules and potentially exert more control over the electoral process. The goal is to undermine the independence of state-run elections and potentially shift election outcomes.
Read More
While Trump’s efforts to influence redistricting have had limited success, the Supreme Court’s potential ruling in *Louisiana v. Callais* poses a far greater threat. Oral arguments suggest the Court may severely weaken or dismantle Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, allowing states to draw racially discriminatory maps. This could lead to a significant shift, potentially costing Democrats numerous seats and solidifying Republican control of the House. Consequently, the Supreme Court’s actions hold the potential to reshape the political landscape, potentially outweighing the impacts of gerrymandering efforts by Trump and state-level Republicans.
Read More
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker warned of potential military deployments in US cities, specifically blue states, as a means for President Trump to control future elections. This follows Trump’s call for Pritzker’s imprisonment and the ongoing deployment of Texas National Guard soldiers to Chicago despite local opposition. Pritzker believes Trump aims to normalize military presence and potentially station personnel near polling places to influence election outcomes, particularly in 2026. Furthermore, Pritzker responded defiantly to Trump’s threats, emphasizing his commitment to protecting his constituents.
Read More
In a recent interview, former President Donald Trump expressed a desire to “survive” until 2026, sparking speculation about his health and safety. Trump’s comments followed concerns about his physical and mental state, including visible bruises, mobility issues, and a tendency toward verbal gaffes. Trump has also expressed anxieties about his prospects in the afterlife, using these fears to encourage donations, notably referencing an assassination attempt. Furthermore, Trump expressed worry about potential GOP losses in the 2026 midterms, citing historical trends of the ruling party facing setbacks in nationwide races.
Read More
Recent national polls reveal a significant decline in Donald Trump’s approval ratings, indicating a level of unpopularity greater than generally perceived. This data suggests a weakening of his political standing. A leading analyst explores the implications of these findings, offering insights into the reasons behind the shift. The analysis further emphasizes the potential ramifications of these trends, particularly concerning the upcoming 2026 elections.
Read More
Several Democratic Senate candidates, including Michigan state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, have launched campaigns against the DSCC’s preferred timeline, signaling a shift in the party. This trend is fueled by Democratic voters’ discontent and lack of confidence in party leaders, leading to crowded and competitive primaries in key states like Michigan, Maine, Iowa, and Texas. The DSCC has remained officially neutral, but some leaders have privately attempted to steer support toward preferred candidates. However, the traditional strategy of party leaders controlling primaries faces new headwinds, as many candidates are running on platforms opposing the status quo and are not endorsing current Democratic leadership. Democrats view these primaries as a sign of the party’s need for change and a reflection of the current political environment.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker