The Supreme Court temporarily blocked Trump’s deportation of Venezuelan immigrants, citing a lack of due process, a ruling that followed an earlier mandate requiring notification and a reasonable opportunity to seek legal recourse before deportation. Trump criticized this decision, claiming the inability to provide trials for all immigrants slated for deportation. He argued that affording due process to every individual would be impractical, despite the Court’s order stemming from an emergency petition alleging violations of that very process. This action comes despite Trump previously praising the conservative-leaning Supreme Court for its rulings in his favor.
Read More
Senator Amy Klobuchar warned of an impending constitutional crisis, but believes that a functioning judiciary, engaged citizenry, and a resistant Congress are preventing it. She urged the Supreme Court to hold Trump administration officials in contempt for defying a court order regarding the wrongful deportation of a Maryland resident. This follows Justice Alito’s dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court decision blocking further Venezuelan deportations, criticizing the majority’s late-night ruling as procedurally flawed and lacking sufficient explanation. Alito argued the court lacked jurisdiction and failed to consider the government’s perspective before issuing the order.
Read More
The Supreme Court will hear a challenge to President Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship, focusing on injunctions against his executive order. This order, based on a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, seeks to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to non-citizen mothers. Several lower courts swiftly issued nationwide injunctions against the order, which the administration unsuccessfully attempted to overturn. The Court must decisively reject the administration’s arguments to uphold birthright citizenship and maintain the integrity of the judicial system.
Read More
A 7-2 Supreme Court decision temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan men, halting a policy relying on the Alien Enemies Act and prompting outrage from MAGA figures. High-ranking officials, including Stephen Miller and Karoline Leavitt, accused the court of prioritizing the rights of “terrorist aliens” over Americans, while others suggested extreme measures like suspending habeas corpus. The ruling, which even saw Trump-appointed justices dissenting, is viewed as a significant setback for the administration’s immigration agenda. This legal challenge continues as the Supreme Court considers the case further.
Read More
In *A.A.R.P. v. Trump*, the Supreme Court issued a late-night order halting the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan immigrants. The administration allegedly moved these immigrants to a Texas facility, provided inadequate notice of deportation in English to primarily Spanish-speaking individuals, and planned immediate removal under the Alien Enemies Act, potentially violating a prior Supreme Court ruling. This action seemingly circumvented the Court’s previous mandate for due process before deportation. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented, with a further statement expected from Justice Alito.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued an emergency order halting the Trump administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelan migrants to an El Salvadoran prison before they could challenge their deportation. This late-night intervention, a highly unusual rebuke, stemmed from the administration’s alleged violation of a previous court order and its deceptive actions toward multiple courts. The Court’s swift action, bypassing lower courts and even a dissenting justice’s full opinion, suggests a lack of trust in the administration’s claims. The 7-2 vote, including Chief Justice Roberts and other typically more conservative justices, signals a potential shift in the Court’s approach towards the administration’s actions.
Read More
Four Seattle police officers, who attended the January 6th, 2021, Capitol rally, are petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain their anonymity in public court records. The Washington State Supreme Court previously ruled against the officers, finding that their right to privacy was not violated by disclosure. The officers argue that revealing their identities would create a chilling effect on free speech and subject them to unwarranted vilification, despite facing no misconduct charges. A response to their petition is expected next week.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued an emergency order halting the Trump administration’s plan to deport Texas migrants to El Salvador under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. This action prevents the removal of detainees within the Northern District of Texas pending further court review, reversing lower court decisions that refused to halt the deportations. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the majority opinion. The ruling follows the ACLU’s appeal after a lower court judge found he lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The stay applies only to migrants detained in the specified district.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued a temporary stay, preventing the Trump administration from deporting Venezuelan men detained in Texas and alleged to be gang members, pending further court order. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from this decision, which comes after a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a similar request to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. The ACLU, representing the detainees, argued for maintaining the status quo to ensure due process before deportation. The Supreme Court’s action follows an earlier ruling requiring habeas corpus petitions for deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, highlighting concerns about the administration’s use of this law and compliance with court orders.
Read More
The ACLU is urgently petitioning the Supreme Court, sounding the alarm that more deportations under the Alien Enemies Act are on the verge of happening. This isn’t just a legal matter; it’s a race against time to prevent what many perceive as imminent human rights violations.
The urgency of the situation is palpable. The fear is that these deportations will happen swiftly and secretly, perhaps even under the cover of a weekend, furthering concerns about due process. This clandestine approach fuels the perception of a deliberate attempt to circumvent judicial oversight and public scrutiny.
The Supreme Court has already issued an order temporarily halting these deportations, a move met with dissent from Justices Thomas and Alito.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood