The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Bayer’s appeal to block numerous state lawsuits concerning its Roundup weedkiller, specifically regarding failure to warn of potential cancer risks. The central issue is whether the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of Roundup, without a cancer warning, preempts state court claims. Bayer, facing approximately 181,000 claims, argues for protection due to its compliance with federal regulations. The case stems from a Missouri jury’s award of $1.25 million to a man with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and a previous Supreme Court decision declined a similar California case.
Read More
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case concerning the constitutionality of geofence warrants, which gather location data of cellphone users near crime scenes. This case stems from a 2019 bank robbery in Virginia where police used a geofence warrant served on Google to find the perpetrator. While a lower court initially found the warrant to violate privacy rights, it upheld the conviction. The case, which has seen conflicting rulings in federal appeals courts, is expected to be argued later this year and could significantly impact how law enforcement uses this investigative technique.
Read More
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Montana county police who entered a man’s home without a warrant due to a perceived suicide risk. Justice Kagan affirmed that officers may enter a home without a warrant if they have an objectively reasonable belief that an occupant is seriously injured or imminently threatened. Police responded to a report of a threatened suicide, observed concerning signs, and entered the home, resulting in an officer shooting the resident after he emerged with what appeared to be a gun. The court ultimately found the officers’ actions justified under the “community caretaker” exception to the Fourth Amendment, upholding the trial court’s decision and the conviction of the resident.
Read More
The Supreme Court has revived a lawsuit brought by Illinois Republican Congressman Mike Bost challenging a state law allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day to be counted. The 7-2 decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, determined that candidates have a concrete interest in the rules governing vote counting. Justices debated whether candidates have standing to challenge such laws, despite lower courts dismissing Bost’s suit. This case reflects broader Republican efforts to challenge mail-in voting practices, with sixteen states currently accepting mail-in ballots received after Election Day.
Read More
The Trump administration initiated a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, alleging he lied to Congress about headquarters renovations, a move perceived as an attempt to force interest rate cuts. This investigation is considered a tactical blunder, as it demonstrates Trump’s true motive of undermining the Fed’s independence for political gain. The probe also reveals why the judiciary must protect Powell, as Trump’s actions showcase his disregard for the rule of law. Ultimately, the Supreme Court, already wary of the administration’s actions, should use this as reason to impose strict limits on the president’s ability to fire the Fed’s members.
Read More
Trump Says Civil Rights Led to White People Being ‘Very Badly Treated’. This sentiment, frankly, is a stark echo of white nationalist rhetoric. It’s a statement that, in its simplicity, lays bare a long-standing, uncomfortable truth about the intersection of race, privilege, and the pursuit of equality in America. The very idea that civil rights have somehow diminished the quality of life for white people is a twisted interpretation of history, one that ignores the systemic advantages that have historically favored white individuals and, more pointedly, continues to do so in many aspects of American life.
The core of the issue lies in the perception of loss of privilege.… Continue reading
Venezuela’s Supreme Court orders Delcy Rodriguez become interim president – Now, that’s a turn of events, isn’t it? It seems the situation in Venezuela has taken a rather unexpected twist, with the Supreme Court stepping in to name Delcy Rodriguez as the interim president. It immediately brings to mind the chaotic and shifting sands of the political landscape, and the assumptions that were quickly made about the future of Venezuela following the recent developments. It’s a move that certainly complicates things, especially given the existing international dynamics and power plays that are always at the heart of this kind of situation.… Continue reading
As the year 2026 began, President Donald Trump hosted his traditional New Year’s Eve celebration at Mar-a-Lago. However, before the party commenced, Trump announced the removal of National Guard troops from several major U.S. cities. This decision followed a significant legal defeat at the Supreme Court, according to a report by NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez.
Read More
Following a week-long hospitalization for a groin hernia and persistent hiccups, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro was discharged and returned to prison. The Supreme Court denied Bolsonaro’s request for house arrest, despite health concerns related to a prior abdominal injury and complications from a 2018 campaign stabbing. Bolsonaro is serving a 27-year sentence for plotting a coup after losing the 2022 election. With Bolsonaro’s political future uncertain, the 2026 presidential race is heating up, with his son potentially vying for leadership of the conservative movement against other contenders, including current President Lula.
Read More
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s previous statement on immigration enforcement, which allowed ethnicity to be a “relevant factor,” has been criticized for being exploited by immigration officials leading to racial profiling and excessive force. In a recent Supreme Court decision, Kavanaugh has seemingly backtracked on his position by stating that race and ethnicity should not be considered in immigration stops, contradicting his earlier stance. This move, which did not directly address or acknowledge the previous controversy, has been interpreted as an attempt to distance himself from the “Kavanaugh stops” label, and the resulting criticism without taking responsibility. Despite this attempted course correction, commentators argue that the Justice cannot undo the legal and practical impact of his initial statements.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood