In a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Zelensky, Turkish President Erdoğan reaffirmed Turkey’s unwavering commitment to Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. Turkey offered itself as a potential mediator for talks between Russia, Ukraine, and the United States, emphasizing the urgent need to end the war and achieve lasting peace. Erdoğan’s statement follows a recent meeting between Russian and US delegations in Riyadh, where both sides agreed to continue dialogue towards conflict resolution. Ankara’s position highlights its proactive role in seeking a peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict.
Read More
Following a meeting between US and Russian representatives in Saudi Arabia, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed concern, noting the discussions mirrored Russia’s initial invasion demands: demilitarization, territorial concessions, and regime change in Ukraine. Zelenskyy highlighted the parallel between these negotiations and Russia’s previous ultimatums, questioning why such concessions would now be considered. He emphasized that initial international support for Ukraine only materialized after the failure of Russia’s initial offensive, highlighting the absence of Ukrainian participation in the Saudi Arabian talks.
Read More
High-level U.S. and Russian officials, including their top diplomats, will meet in Saudi Arabia to discuss improving bilateral relations and negotiating a resolution to the war in Ukraine. This marks a significant step towards de-escalation and potential future talks between Presidents Trump and Putin, despite concerns from Ukraine and its allies regarding their exclusion from the initial discussions. The meeting aims to gauge Russia’s commitment to peace and explore the possibility of detailed negotiations, although Ukrainian involvement is considered essential for any lasting agreement. Russia has indicated a focus on restoring full diplomatic ties and preparing for potential presidential talks, while rejecting any territorial concessions.
Read More
In response to potential reduced US security support for Europe and the exclusion of Ukraine from initial US-Russia peace talks, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer proposed deploying British troops to Ukraine as part of a potential 100,000-strong European peacekeeping force. This deployment, discussed at an upcoming Paris meeting, aims to guarantee Ukraine’s security and prevent future Russian aggression. Starmer stressed the importance of including Ukraine in all peace negotiations and highlighted the potential for a 25,000-30,000-troop European deterrent force, potentially supported by US intelligence and air power. The proposal underscores growing European concerns about reliance on the US for security.
Read More
President Zelenskyy, in an interview with ARD, criticized what he perceives as US rhetoric aimed at appeasing Putin and hastening a peace deal, even at the cost of Ukrainian territorial concessions. He firmly stated Ukraine will not cede legally recognized territory and expressed confidence in reclaiming all occupied lands, emphasizing the importance of upholding international law. Zelenskyy also highlighted the need for NATO membership to be included in any negotiations and disagreed with assessments suggesting that regaining the 2014 borders is unrealistic. He further asserted that a ceasefire, without the restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty, is not a genuine success.
Read More
Ukraine’s unwavering stance is clear: they will not accept any peace deal terms negotiated without their active participation. This fundamental principle underscores the nation’s determination to control its own destiny and reject any imposed solutions.
The idea that Ukraine’s future could be decided by external forces without their consent is unacceptable. The gravity of this situation cannot be overstated; it involves the security of a nation and its people, not just geopolitical strategy.
Ukraine’s refusal to be sidelined highlights the inherent unfairness of such an approach. A peace agreement that excludes a primary party to the conflict is fundamentally flawed and unlikely to achieve lasting stability.… Continue reading
The U.S. proposed a deal to Ukraine offering security guarantees, including potential troop deployment, in exchange for 50% of its rare earth minerals. This proposal, presented by Treasury Secretary Bessent, was deemed a “memorandum,” not a formal security agreement, by President Zelensky, who requested further review. While Zelensky hasn’t signed, he has previously indicated openness to resource partnerships for security guarantees. Trump further claimed an “essential agreement” on a $500 billion resource deal.
Read More
Behind-the-scenes at the Munich Security Conference, the US pressured Ukraine to immediately sign a proposed mineral resources deal in exchange for a meeting with Vice President JD Vance, threatening to cancel the meeting otherwise. Kyiv refused to sign the US’s proposed version of the agreement, rejecting proposed amendments. Despite this refusal, the meeting proceeded as planned after the US dropped its demand. The initial US request was interpreted by Ukraine as a figurative expression of urgency, but proved to be a literal precondition for the meeting. Zelenskyy’s refusal to sign under pressure ultimately led to constructive dialogue.
Read More
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy firmly stated that Ukraine will not participate in, nor recognize any agreements reached in, Saudi Arabia-based talks between Russian and US representatives concerning Ukraine. He emphasized that any negotiations excluding Ukraine are meaningless. Zelenskyy’s own Saudi Arabia visit, focusing on oil price reduction and unrelated to the US-Russia discussions, included plans to address the talks directly with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Zelenskyy believes President Trump holds significant influence over oil prices and could potentially lower them.
Read More
Ten years after Russia’s expulsion from the G8 for its annexation of Crimea, Donald Trump advocated for Russia’s reinstatement, blaming previous administrations for the conflict in Ukraine. He further proposed a 50 percent reduction in the US defense budget, contingent on negotiations with Russia and China to achieve similar cuts. Trump asserted that Russia’s invasion was provoked by Ukraine’s potential NATO membership and expressed a belief that Putin desires peace, despite evidence to the contrary. He notably refrained from demanding any territorial concessions from Russia in any potential settlement.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood