A Paris summit on March 11th will convene chiefs of staff from nearly all NATO members (excluding the US, Croatia, and Montenegro) to discuss forming international security forces for post-ceasefire Ukraine. These forces, proposed by France and the UK, would involve rapid deployment of heavy weaponry to deter Russian aggression. The meeting will detail force composition and member capabilities, with final participation decisions resting with heads of state. Remote participation from Asian and Oceanian nations is also expected.
Read More
Türkiye blocked Israel’s participation in NATO’s “Resilience and Emergency Preparedness” exercise, leveraging its veto power despite initial support from other NATO members. This action stems from ongoing tensions between Türkiye and Israel, exacerbated by the Gaza conflict. A senior Israeli official criticized Türkiye’s use of its veto as a political tool detrimental to regional cooperation and NATO’s effectiveness. This incident highlights the deep rift between the two nations and its impact on NATO activities.
Read More
Following allegations of financial improprieties, links to unsavory figures, and suspected Russian interference including a large-scale TikTok campaign, Romanian authorities canceled the mayoral election in Bucharest. Georgescu, a candidate critical of NATO and admiring of Putin, was subsequently banned from participating in the May rerun. This decision, while seen by some as evidence of establishment collusion, is also viewed by others as a necessary response to foreign interference. Widespread disillusionment with the political establishment, however, complicates the issue.
Read More
Elon Musk, echoing previous statements by Donald Trump, advocated for US withdrawal from NATO, arguing that American taxpayers should not fund European defense. This stance aligns with Trump’s repeated criticisms of European defense spending and his past threats to leave the alliance unless members increased contributions. Musk’s suggestion comes amidst growing US-Europe tensions, particularly concerning support for Ukraine, and as the Trump administration, in which Musk holds a powerful position, has shown signs of distancing itself from Kyiv. Musk’s call to leave NATO underscores the significant strain on transatlantic relations.
Read More
Western intelligence officials, including Germany’s BND head Bruno Kahl, express concern that a swift end to the war in Ukraine could embolden Russia to attack Europe sooner, potentially testing NATO’s Article 5. This assessment has sparked outrage in Ukraine, where officials reject the notion of their country serving as a buffer for European security. Conflicting opinions within Ukraine itself highlight the deeply divisive nature of the debate, ranging from accusations of European military unpreparedness to pleas for immediate peace negotiations. The situation is further complicated by a growing rift between the US, Europe, and Ukraine regarding the war’s resolution and the acceptable costs involved, leaving Ukraine’s future uncertain.
Read More
Latvian President Edgars Rinkevics advocates for increased European defense spending and the adoption of conscription, citing Europe’s current military weakness. He emphasizes the need for concrete actions, not just declarations, particularly concerning increased NATO presence on the Baltic borders with Russia. Rinkevics acknowledges strong US-Latvian cooperation but stresses the importance of Europe’s independent strengthening, including increased military capacity. He considers the Baltic states a crucial test of NATO’s effectiveness and underlines the alliance’s reliance on Article Five’s collective defense commitment.
Read More
Trump and Vance aren’t clever, they’re clueless; a characterization that fundamentally undersells the gravity of their actions. To label their approach to the existential threat posed by Putin and his regime as merely “naive” is a gross understatement, bordering on willful blindness. Their actions suggest a far more sinister reality.
Their dismissal of Russia as a threat isn’t the result of simple ignorance; it’s a calculated decision, a deliberate downplaying of a clear and present danger. This isn’t about a lack of understanding of geopolitical complexities; it’s about a conscious choice to ignore the evidence and actively undermine efforts to counter Putin’s aggression.… Continue reading
US ‘to cease all future military exercises in Europe’ – a decision of staggering implications. The announcement itself sends shockwaves across the Atlantic, leaving many questioning the motivations and potential consequences of such a dramatic shift in long-standing US policy. Eighty years of bipartisan commitment to European security, seemingly discarded overnight. It’s a move that feels deeply unsettling, not just for the nations directly affected but for the global balance of power.
This abrupt cessation of military exercises isn’t just a symbolic gesture; it fundamentally alters the security architecture of Europe. The ramifications are far-reaching, potentially weakening NATO’s collective defense posture and emboldening adversaries like Russia and China.… Continue reading
The U.S. has informed allies of its intent to limit future European military exercises to those already planned for 2025, impacting exercises in development, particularly in Sweden. This decision reflects a broader shift in U.S. security priorities towards the Indo-Pacific, evidenced by actions such as ending aid to Ukraine and excluding European allies from peace talks. This decreased U.S. involvement is prompting Europe to bolster its own defense capabilities, with the EU potentially allocating €800 billion for increased military spending. The reduced joint operations will impact the long-standing cooperation and readiness testing between the U.S. and its European allies.
Read More
President Trump asserted that negotiating peace between Ukraine and Russia proves more challenging with Ukraine than Russia, despite considering substantial sanctions against Russia for its ongoing attacks. This statement followed a suspension of US military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, as well as the temporary halting of Ukrainian access to certain US satellite imagery. Trump’s actions, including a public rebuke of President Zelensky, have sparked controversy among NATO allies and raised questions about the US’s commitment to Ukraine. Simultaneously, Trump’s administration appears to be pursuing a deal with Ukraine involving mineral concessions and a swift truce with Russia.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood