Following the 2024 election loss, Democrats are grappling with their future strategy, with many discussions taking place on podcasts. Pete Buttigieg, in an NPR interview, warned against simply restoring the pre-Trump status quo, arguing that Democrats were too attached to a system that was failing. He emphasized the need to embrace change and acknowledged a broader loss of societal trust, citing the Epstein scandal as a key example. Buttigieg also expressed concern about the “politics of fear” and its impact on free speech and intellectual inquiry, and offered a counterpoint: the importance of courage.
Read More
The Democratic Party is conducting an “after-action review” following their 2024 election loss, but it will surprisingly bypass an examination of their presidential campaign strategy. The review, led by strategist Paul Rivera, will not analyze key campaign decisions such as whether President Biden should have sought re-election, or messaging choices made by the Harris campaign. Instead, the report is expected to concentrate on outside spending from supporting organizations and super PACs. Party officials have stated that the review intends to focus on voter behavior and how to improve the party’s future, specifically by shifting away from traditional advertising and towards organizing.
Read More
Recent polling indicates that Democratic voters who abstained from voting in the 2024 election favor more progressive candidates. The survey of “Biden skippers” revealed high favorability ratings for Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, highlighting a desire for leaders who champion healthcare, environmental protection, and progressive economic policies. These voters were motivated by accessible and affordable healthcare, ensuring the wealthy pay their taxes, affordable housing, and curbing Big Pharma’s price gouging for prescription drugs. The poll’s findings suggest these voters are open to Democratic messaging that aggressively addresses Republican policies and could be key in rebuilding a sustainable Democratic coalition.
Read More
New research challenges the assumption that Democrats lost the 2024 election due to moving too far left. Polling indicates that voters who supported Biden in 2020 but didn’t vote in 2024 actually favor more progressive policies, such as affordable healthcare and holding the wealthy accountable. These voters cited economic concerns and the perceived “lesser of two evils” as reasons for not voting. The data suggests that Democrats could regain support by focusing on these issues and offering clear solutions to address them.
Read More
A civil grand jury report examining Riverside County’s Registrar of Voters revealed a “serious security breach” during the 2024 election due to bomb threats. While the report found no fraud or malfeasance, it highlighted inadequate emergency procedures for temporary workers during evacuations, noting a lack of evacuation records and missing emergency supplies. The jury recommended improvements in the ballot chain of custody system, suggesting a move to an automated system to enhance security and efficiency, and recommended automation in the signature verification process to streamline vote counting. Despite efforts to improve election security and transparency, the report also pointed out areas for improvement in training and procedure.
Read More
In a recent press conference, President Trump’s response to a question regarding the timeframe detainees would stay at a new detention center sparked concern due to its apparent disconnect from the question. This incident, along with a series of previous stumbles and gaffes, has ignited renewed discussions about the president’s cognitive abilities. Critics, including psychologists and family members, have voiced concerns, with some suggesting the possibility of cognitive decline and raising questions about his fitness for office. These observations follow Trump’s own past criticisms of former President Biden’s cognitive state.
Read More
Donald Trump has dropped his federal lawsuit against Iowa pollster J. Ann Selzer, the Des Moines Register, and Gannett, alleging the survey falsely boosted Kamala Harris’s chances during the 2024 election. The case was dismissed without prejudice after the president’s legal team was denied requests to move the lawsuit out of federal court, and a similar complaint was subsequently filed in Iowa district court. Selzer’s attorney stated that there was no settlement involved, and the newspaper will continue to defend its First Amendment rights. This withdrawal occurs alongside a separate $20 billion lawsuit against CBS News, which is expected to reach a settlement.
Read More
In a recent legal development, a case challenging the results of the 2024 election has progressed, initiated by SMART Legislation over alleged voting irregularities in Rockland County, New York. The case alleges discrepancies between the number of votes cast for a Senate candidate and the official count, along with statistical anomalies in voting patterns. Judge Rachel Tanguay has acknowledged the legitimacy of the claims and ordered all discovery to be completed within seven months. The plaintiffs have requested extensive data, including voting machine information and records of irregularities from 2020 and 2024 elections, to investigate the matter further.
Read More
As part of the discovery process, SMART Legislation submitted extensive document requests and questions to the Rockland County Board of Elections regarding the 2024 election results. The requests seek information on voting machines, software, security protocols, and communications with vendors, including software updates. The inquiries also questioned the use of technologies like Starlink’s Direct to Cell service. Furthermore, the lawsuit, with a full hand recount requested, highlights discrepancies in vote counts and statistical improbabilities within the 2024 election data. The next court hearing is a compliance conference set for September 22, 2025, at the Rockland County Courthouse.
Read More
According to a recent Pew Research Center analysis, Donald Trump came close to winning the Latino vote in 2024, securing a larger share than in previous elections. The study revealed that Trump garnered 48% of the Latino vote, while Kamala Harris received 51%. Furthermore, the analysis indicated that Latino voters who did not participate in 2020 favored Trump significantly. The report highlighted a shift in voting patterns based on education, with those without college degrees more likely to vote for Trump.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker