Following the announcement of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Donald Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, several Democrats criticized Attorney General Merrick Garland for a perceived delay in launching the probe. These critics, including Representatives Nadler and Lofgren and Senators Schiff and Smith, argued that the January 6th Committee’s findings should have prompted immediate action, potentially altering the outcome of the 2024 election. Conversely, some Democrats attributed the perceived inaction to Trump’s success in manipulating the narrative surrounding the January 6th attack. Regardless, Special Counsel Smith’s impending report and recommendations will soon be submitted to the Department of Justice.
Read More
Vice President Kamala Harris will certify Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory on January 6th, a duty mandated by federal law. This action contrasts sharply with her campaign rhetoric, where she vehemently denounced Trump as a threat to democracy and warned against his presidency. The certification occurs four years after the January 6th Capitol riot, fueled by Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Increased security measures are in place for the event, reflecting the heightened tensions surrounding the process.
Read More
Following the January 6th Capitol attack, Donald Trump escaped criminal prosecution, despite calls for accountability from both Democrats and Republicans. Critics, including some within the Biden administration, fault Attorney General Merrick Garland for delaying the appointment of a special prosecutor until after Trump’s reelection, enabling Trump to avoid trial due to legal protections afforded to sitting presidents. This delay, coupled with a Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, allowed Trump to evade responsibility, ultimately winning the 2024 election. While over 1000 individuals involved in the attack faced prosecution, Trump’s actions remain largely unaddressed, other than potential civil lawsuits.
Read More
A new AP-NORC poll reveals a significant shift in Republican confidence regarding election integrity. Following Donald Trump’s 2024 victory, approximately 60% of Republicans expressed considerable confidence in the national vote count, a substantial increase from October’s figures. This rise in confidence extends to state-level counts, and overall public confidence in the accuracy of the 2024 election is now around 60%, up from 50% in October. This contrasts sharply with the post-2020 period, marked by widespread Republican skepticism fueled by Trump’s unsubstantiated claims of election fraud.
Read More
Following the 2024 election, Nick Fuentes, despite briefly withdrawing support from Trump’s campaign due to perceived outside influence, delivered a vulgar message seemingly endorsing the Republican Party’s perceived dismissal of voters until the next election cycle. This statement follows Fuentes’ recent outspoken opposition to the H-1B visa program, contrasting sharply with Elon Musk’s support. Fuentes’ actions highlight the ongoing internal conflicts within the Republican party and the influence of far-right figures. His previous “Groyper war” declaration against the Trump campaign further contextualizes his post-election rhetoric.
Read More
The 2024 election, despite warnings from both candidates about its importance, saw 90 million Americans abstain from voting, a number exceeding Trump’s vote total. This alarming non-participation, particularly among younger, more diverse, and less affluent demographics, contributed to Trump’s victory and poses a significant threat to American democracy. Addressing this requires tackling the problem directly, potentially through mandatory voting, a system successfully employed in other countries like Australia, resulting in consistently high voter turnout. Implementing mandatory voting in the U.S., perhaps starting at the state level, would not only increase participation but also send a crucial message about the value of civic engagement.
Read More
The year 2024 was marked by a significant decline in basic human decency, largely fueled by the re-election of a president known for his cruelty, dishonesty, and embrace of hateful rhetoric. This normalization of immoral behavior, exemplified by the president’s actions and the rise of conspiracy theories, resulted in increased social division and a disregard for ethical conduct. The year also witnessed continued school shootings and ongoing wars, highlighting a global apathy towards widespread suffering. The author concludes that the moral cost of the political climate has already been immense, foreshadowing a potentially far worse future.
Read More
Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued robust reporting. HuffPost remains committed to providing fearless coverage of the new administration. This crucial information will remain freely available to all readers, thanks to reader support. Contributions, even a free account login, directly enable this vital public service.
Read More
Kamala Harris faced significant opposition from segments of the Arab American community during her presidential campaign, with groups like the Uncommitted National Movement and the “Abandon Harris” campaign criticizing her perceived insufficient distancing from the Biden administration’s handling of the Gaza war. These groups felt Harris did not adequately address their concerns, leading many to vote against her or abstain from voting for president altogether, contributing to a significant shift in support towards Donald Trump in key demographics. While the Harris campaign cited outreach efforts and policy alignment, critics argued her messaging lacked a clear alternative vision and prioritized reaction to Trump’s rhetoric over proactive engagement with their concerns. The outcome left many feeling disillusioned with the Democratic Party and apprehensive about the incoming Trump administration’s Middle East policies.
Read More
Representative Annie Kuster, citing the January 6th Capitol riot and its impact on her ability to work effectively in an increasingly polarized Congress, announced her retirement. Kuster, who narrowly escaped the rioters, stated that the events of that day, and the subsequent actions of individuals like Elon Musk, influenced her decision. She also expressed concerns about President Biden’s ability to win re-election against Donald Trump. Ultimately, her retirement reflects a desire for a less combative political environment.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker