A North Carolina federal court issued a preliminary order directing election officials to comply with a state court ruling that could disenfranchise thousands of military and overseas voters in a contested state Supreme Court election. However, the federal court also blocked election certification pending a ruling on the state court remedy’s constitutionality. This action risks undermining election legitimacy, mirroring concerns raised in *Bush v. Gore* regarding the premature announcement of questionable vote recounts. Legal experts argue the state court’s actions violate the 14th Amendment’s due process clause by retroactively changing eligibility rules and potentially disenfranchising voters who complied with existing law. The optimal course is to resolve the constitutional questions before attempting to collect further voter information.
Read More
FEMA denied North Carolina’s request to extend the full reimbursement period for Hurricane Helene recovery efforts, a decision met with strong criticism from Governor Josh Stein. This follows President Trump’s previous accusations of slow and ineffective FEMA response in the state, despite FEMA’s denial of political bias in aid distribution. The rejection comes amidst ongoing recovery efforts in the state, which sustained $8.4 billion in damages from the hurricane, and President Trump’s stated intentions to eliminate FEMA entirely. Governor Stein has urged the President to reconsider the decision.
Read More
A North Carolina appeals court controversially overturned over 60,000 votes in a state Supreme Court race, a decision potentially setting a precedent for future election challenges. Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin, who lost by a narrow margin, targeted ballots with minor registration issues or lacking strict photo ID from overseas voters, disproportionately impacting Democratic-leaning areas. This ruling, if upheld, would effectively institutionalize election denial and provide a blueprint for overturning future elections, raising serious concerns about the integrity of the democratic process. The decision has sparked outrage and legal challenges, with experts arguing it violates federal due process principles and sets a dangerous precedent.
Read More
A North Carolina judge dismissed a Republican National Committee lawsuit seeking to invalidate nearly 60,000 ballots cast in the November 2024 election. The GOP argued that these ballots were illegally cast due to missing identification information on voter registration applications. This action mirrors similar challenges filed by the losing Republican candidate for North Carolina Supreme Court, Jefferson Griffin. The judge’s ruling found insufficient evidence of irreparable harm to warrant a preliminary injunction, rejecting the GOP’s request to set aside the challenged ballots. The Democratic National Committee opposed the lawsuit, characterizing it as a voter suppression tactic.
Read More
The North Carolina State Board of Elections unanimously rejected the Republican Party’s attempt to invalidate over 60,000 ballots cast in the 2022 general election, a move aimed at impacting several close races, including a Supreme Court contest. The GOP’s challenge, based on alleged irregularities and lack of driver’s license information in a state database, was deemed an affront to democracy by board members. While the decision can be appealed, the board’s rejection marks another setback for similar challenges previously rejected by the state and federal courts. The outcome of the affected races, including the Supreme Court race and several state legislative seats, remains uncertain pending potential legal action.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker