In a recent move, a Justice Department official announced that former U.S. President Donald Trump pardoned several of his allies, including Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows, who were accused of supporting efforts to overturn the 2020 election. This “full, complete, and unconditional” pardon, detailed in a signed proclamation, also included conservative lawyers and individuals involved in submitting false certificates. The pardons, explicitly excluding Trump himself, underscore his ongoing attempts to reinterpret the election results, a move that follows similar pardons for those charged in the January 6th riot. This action, described as a step towards “national reconciliation,” targeted individuals facing state charges, while Trump himself had an indictment abandoned due to his victory over Kamala Harris.
Read More
In a recent proclamation, President Donald Trump pardoned numerous political allies, including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Mark Meadows, for their involvement in alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. According to the document, the pardons are described as a step toward national reconciliation and cover a range of individuals, including co-defendants charged in Georgia. The pardons are only applicable to federal charges and do not extend to state or local charges, nor do they apply to Trump himself. Additionally, clemency was granted to a retired police officer convicted of stalking for the Chinese government and former baseball star Darryl Strawberry for a tax evasion charge.
Read More
The Department of Justice has requested election records from Fulton County, Georgia, related to the 2020 election, citing a provision of the Civil Rights Act and other federal statutes, despite previous investigations clearing the county of malfeasance. The request, spurred by a resolution from the state election board, seeks documents related to voter lists, ballot images, and other election materials. The department’s justification for the request, as stated in a letter from the civil rights division, is to ensure transparency and compliance with federal law, although legal experts have questioned the lack of a specific basis for requesting the records. This action aligns with the administration’s broader efforts to scrutinize voting processes, including requests for voter roll information from numerous states and the hiring of individuals who previously worked to challenge the 2020 election results.
Read More
According to recently published notes from Mike Pence’s day planner, Donald Trump berated Pence, calling him a “wimp” for refusing to overturn the 2020 election results. The notes, included in Jonathan Karl’s new book, detail the phone call between Trump and Pence on January 6, 2021, where Trump expressed his disapproval of Pence’s decision to certify the election. The notes also reveal Trump’s apparent anger, with an emoji drawn next to a comment. The special counsel Jack Smith planned to use the notes as evidence, but the case was dismissed.
Read More
The revelation of Mike Pence’s never-before-published notes, as reported in a new book, offers critical evidence in the case against Donald Trump. The notes, including an “angry face” emoji doodle, offer a peek into the tense moments surrounding the January 6th events and the former President’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. The book suggests that these notes, along with other pieces of evidence, strengthen the arguments against Trump.
One of the key elements emerging from the book is the alleged pressure Trump put on Pence. It’s reported that Trump told Pence that he would be perceived as a “wimp” if he didn’t cooperate in overturning the election results.… Continue reading
In a recent Truth Social post, former President Donald Trump called for the prosecution of several Biden administration officials, including Jack Smith, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray, and Lisa Monaco, over their alleged involvement in the investigation into the 2020 election. Trump claimed these officials were involved in an operation that spied on members of Congress and rigged the election, though the documents he referenced are unclear. This call for prosecution comes after the Senate Judiciary Committee released documents revealing the FBI’s analysis of phone records of Republican members of Congress during the investigation into the January 6th Capitol attack. Trump has previously expressed animosity towards Smith, and other GOP members have requested the Department of Justice investigate him.
Read More
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Bryan ruled that MyPillow founder Mike Lindell defamed Smartmatic by making false claims that its voting machines rigged the 2020 presidential election. The judge, however, deferred the question of whether Lindell acted with “actual malice,” which is required for Smartmatic to collect damages. Lindell repeatedly stated in documentaries and media appearances that the machines were rigged, specifically in Los Angeles County where Smartmatic was used. Smartmatic is now seeking substantial damages from Lindell, as it aims to hold him accountable for spreading lies.
Read More
Rudy Giuliani has reached a settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in its $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit, with both parties agreeing to dismiss the suit permanently. The terms of the settlement remain confidential, but the lawsuit stemmed from Giuliani’s false claims about Dominion’s role in rigging the 2020 election. The former New York City mayor faced legal challenges after leading former President Donald Trump’s efforts to discredit the election results. This settlement follows other significant agreements Dominion has reached with Fox News and Newsmax, and further compounds a series of legal and financial difficulties Giuliani has faced.
Read More
In a significant development, a Michigan judge dismissed criminal charges against a group of individuals accused of attempting to falsely certify Donald Trump as the winner of the 2020 election, citing a lack of intent to commit fraud. The 15 Republicans, including prominent members of the state’s GOP, faced forgery and conspiracy charges related to signing a document falsely claiming they were the state’s duly elected electors. The judge determined that the defendants believed they were executing their constitutional right to seek redress. Following the ruling, Attorney General Dana Nessel expressed disappointment and said that she is considering an appeal.
Read More
A Michigan judge has dismissed charges against the state’s fake electors who falsely claimed Donald Trump won the 2020 election, citing a lack of evidence proving the group knowingly intended to break the law. The ruling ends the criminal prosecutions against the group, which included prominent GOP officials and Trump supporters. This decision is a setback to accountability efforts, especially since similar cases are still pending in other states like Nevada, Arizona, and Wisconsin. The Attorney General of Michigan, who brought the case, disagreed with the ruling and is evaluating the next steps, as defense lawyers celebrated it as a victory.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood