Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election has sparked controversy. Republicans criticized the move as a political stunt, particularly given the refusal to release a related report on Trump’s handling of classified documents. Conversely, some Democrats lauded the partial release but criticized Garland for a delayed investigation. The differing reactions highlight the highly partisan nature of the situation, with Republicans pointing to the unreleased materials from the Biden investigation as a double standard. The release may also embolden future congressional efforts to challenge executive privilege claims.
Read More
Following a legal challenge, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected efforts to block the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This report, focusing on the January 6th events, was part of a broader investigation also encompassing the handling of classified documents. While the court’s decision allows for release, Judge Cannon’s three-day delay remains in effect, potentially leaving room for further appeals before the January 20th inauguration. Trump’s legal team plans to appeal, aiming to prevent its release until he assumes office.
Read More
The Justice Department secured permission to release Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report detailing President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, though a three-day delay remains pending potential Supreme Court intervention. This ruling comes as the Supreme Court also allowed Trump’s New York hush-money case sentencing to proceed. Trump faces multiple indictments related to election interference, including conspiracy to defraud the United States. While Attorney General Garland intends to release the election interference section of the report, volume two concerning classified documents will remain unreleased pending related cases.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith submitted his final report on the Trump investigations to Attorney General Merrick Garland. Garland intends to publicly release volume one, concerning Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, pending the Eleventh Circuit’s decision on a temporary injunction. Volume two, related to the classified documents case, will remain confidential to protect ongoing co-defendant cases, though limited access will be granted to Congressional leadership. The Justice Department is seeking to vacate the injunction, allowing for immediate release of volume one if the appeals court rules in their favor.
Read More
On January 6, 2021, Donald Trump orchestrated a violent insurrection attempt to overturn the 2020 election results, resulting in deaths and injuries. Thousands of his supporters stormed the Capitol building, spurred by his repeated false claims of election fraud. This attack, linked to various extremist groups, led to numerous arrests and charges. Trump’s actions prompted impeachment proceedings and highlighted the fragility of U.S. democracy.
Read More
The January 6th, 2021 attack on the US Capitol, while presented by some as a minor incident, was a culmination of a broader effort by Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election results. This included pressure on election officials, the promotion of misinformation, and the deployment of “fake electors.” Despite the violence and arrests, a significant portion of the population, particularly Republicans, downplay the event’s severity, exhibiting a concerning normalization of the attempted coup. This revisionist narrative, fueled by disinformation campaigns from certain media outlets, suggests a concerning vulnerability to manipulation within the information ecosystem.
Read More
In June 2020, Aleksandr Smirnov falsely claimed to the FBI that Burisma executives paid Joe and Hunter Biden millions of dollars, a fabrication that fueled unfounded allegations of corruption against the then-Vice President. This false narrative, which involved Russian intelligence officials, was disseminated to influence the 2020 election. Smirnov pleaded guilty and faces a two-to-six-year sentence, though a potential pardon from Donald Trump remains a possibility. The incident highlights the dangers of disinformation campaigns and foreign interference in U.S. elections.
Read More
Trump lawyers and an aide are facing new felony charges in Wisconsin, stemming from the infamous “fake electors” scheme. This development significantly escalates the legal challenges facing Trump and his inner circle, adding another layer to the ongoing investigations into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. The charges underscore the seriousness of the allegations and the potential consequences for those involved.
These new felony charges represent a substantial hurdle for the individuals involved. The accusations directly relate to their alleged participation in a coordinated effort to subvert the democratic process, casting a long shadow over their actions and raising serious questions about their motivations.… Continue reading
Following his “Patriot of the Year” award from Fox News, Trump announced plans to address election integrity, focusing on implementing paper ballots, one-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship. This renewed focus on election reform, despite his November victory and the statistical rarity of widespread voter fraud, suggests a continued pursuit of his 2020 election fraud claims. His comments specifically targeted California’s voting system, which doesn’t mandate photo ID at polling places.
Read More
Elon Musk’s alleged involvement with the “RBG PAC,” a pro-Trump super PAC that used the image of the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in its advertising, raises significant questions. The PAC spent millions in the final weeks before the 2020 election on ads falsely suggesting that Justice Ginsburg’s views on abortion aligned with Donald Trump’s. This blatant misrepresentation of Ginsburg’s well-known pro-choice stance is particularly jarring.
This deceptive campaign strategy is even more concerning considering the timing and source of the funding. Musk reportedly donated a staggering $20.5 million to the RBG PAC on October 24th, just before the election, ensuring the contribution wouldn’t be publicly known until after the voting concluded.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood