The final criminal case related to Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results has been dismissed five years after the fact, meaning Trump will face no criminal trial. The dismissal of Georgia’s racketeering case, combined with the abandonment of federal election-interference charges due to presidential immunity, has effectively closed all avenues for holding Trump criminally liable. These decisions were made despite detailed allegations and strong evidence of wrongdoing, leading to questions about accountability and the limits of the legal system. This outcome leaves voters to determine consequences, while also raising questions about the precedent set by these dismissals.
Read More
Tennessee Democrats are investigating reports of postcards circulating with an incorrect election date for the special election between Aftyn Behn and Matt Van Epps in the 7th Congressional District. The mailers, which lack attribution, reportedly direct voters to cast their ballots on December 3rd, a day after the actual election. This race has garnered significant attention, with the outcome potentially impacting the balance of power in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a narrow majority. Turnout levels, particularly in the district’s rural areas and Democratic-leaning Nashville, are expected to play a crucial role in determining the election’s outcome.
Read More
In a controversial decision, a Georgia prosecutor dropped criminal charges against Donald Trump regarding his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. This move, seen as detrimental to the rule of law, came after the case against Trump faced setbacks due to alleged ethical violations involving the original prosecutor. The dismissal of the case, supported by a 22-page filing, effectively dismissed a wealth of evidence that could have painted a dark picture of Trump’s egregious conduct, and it offered alternative interpretations of Trump’s actions. Rather than allowing a jury to decide on the interpretations, the prosecutor whitewashed history, denying a jury of its right to decide on Trump’s actions in 2020.
Read More
New prosecutor chosen in Georgia 2020 election interference case against Trump, others. This whole situation feels like a movie, doesn’t it? The saga of the Georgia election interference case, involving Donald Trump and others, has taken another turn. The news is that a new prosecutor has been chosen, and the reaction, well, it’s mixed, to say the least.
The initial reaction seems to be a deep-seated skepticism, almost resignation. There’s a prevailing sense that the system is rigged, that the powerful will always find a way to escape accountability. The fact that the new prosecutor, Pete Skandalakis, named himself to the position after leading the search isn’t exactly inspiring confidence.… Continue reading
The Georgia racketeering case against Donald Trump and his allies will now be overseen by Peter Skandalakis, director of the Prosecuting Attorney’s Council of Georgia, after several other prosecutors declined to take on the case. Originally launched by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, the case faced legal challenges that led to Willis’s removal. Skandalakis received the investigative file and is reviewing it, with a status conference scheduled for December 1. While a former U.S. attorney is skeptical the case will proceed, Trump’s defense maintains his innocence and confidence in a dismissal.
Read More
The former President, Donald Trump, pardoned members of his 2020 campaign legal team, including Rudy Giuliani, Kenneth Chesebro, and Sydney Powell, for their involvement in an attempt to alter election results. This announcement came late on Sunday, likely to be buried in the news cycle. These individuals were part of the “fake elector” scheme, aimed at overturning the election outcome in favor of Trump. Notably, the announcement pointedly indicated that Trump did not pardon himself.
Read More
President Trump suggested that New York City’s federal funding could be jeopardized if Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, wins the mayoral election. Trump labeled Mamdani a “communist” during a 60 Minutes interview, implying he would be hesitant to provide funding to a city led by someone with those political views. Trump also stated he would prefer the disgraced former governor Andrew Cuomo over Mamdani and indicated he may deploy troops to the city, echoing previous actions in other Democrat-led cities. Federal grants are a major source of revenue for New York City, which supports a number of essential services.
Read More
House Republicans are exploring the use of the Constitution’s “insurrection clause” to prevent Zohran Mamdani from taking office, citing his statements regarding ICE resistance as potentially violating the provision. The New York Young Republican Club is spearheading this effort, drawing parallels to the attempt to remove Trump from the Colorado ballot. Simultaneously, some House Republicans are urging the Justice Department to investigate Mamdani’s path to citizenship, citing statements made during his naturalization process and his alleged failure to disclose affiliations. These actions are driven by concerns over Mamdani’s political ideology and aim to create a political wedge within the Democratic party.
Read More
The Trump Administration, following requests from Republican officials, plans to send observers to monitor upcoming elections in six counties across New Jersey and California. This decision, aimed at ensuring transparency and ballot security, has drawn criticism from Democratic leaders who view it as potential interference in key races. These elections are significant, with California’s Proposition 50 potentially impacting the balance of power in Congress and the New Jersey governor’s race drawing national attention. Democrats express concerns, citing the Trump Administration’s history of spreading false claims of voter fraud, and fear the monitoring effort is intended to suppress votes.
Read More
A recent report revealed that Trump’s election integrity official suggested invoking a “national emergency” to justify a federal takeover of state-run election processes for the 2026 election. This proposal comes amidst concerns from voting rights advocates, particularly given the elevation of election deniers within the administration. These individuals, who have pushed false claims of voter fraud, are reportedly aiming to influence election rules and potentially exert more control over the electoral process. The goal is to undermine the independence of state-run elections and potentially shift election outcomes.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood