Democrats expecting Trump to interfere with midterms, Schumer says, and it’s difficult not to acknowledge the underlying sense of resignation that seems to be permeating the discussion. It’s almost a foregone conclusion, isn’t it? The sentiment seems to be that it’s not a question of *if*, but *how* and *to what extent* this interference will manifest. The feeling is that the meddling has already begun, and the real question is whether anything substantive will be done to prevent or mitigate it.
The core of the issue boils down to a perceived lack of proactive measures. The comments express a deep-seated frustration with the existing strategies, with many suggesting that merely acknowledging the threat isn’t enough.… Continue reading
Following the January 6th Capitol attack, initial expectations of accountability for Donald Trump and his allies were quickly dashed. Despite investigations and early distancing from Trump by some Republicans, Trump pardoned nearly 1,600 individuals involved and has avoided legal and political consequences. The failure of prosecutions, attributed to delays and the political landscape, allowed Trump to win re-election and reshape the federal legal system. This lack of accountability stands in stark contrast to how other countries have handled similar events, like the aftermath of the storming of government buildings in Brazil.
Read More
According to a released transcript from a congressional deposition, former special counsel Jack Smith confirmed he never communicated with President Joe Biden regarding his investigations into Donald Trump. Smith defended the charges against Trump, emphasizing the potential for “catastrophic” consequences if election interference goes unpunished. During the testimony, Smith asserted he operated independently, without interference from top justice department officials, and maintained that his actions were not politically motivated. Smith also addressed concerns over the collection of phone data, clarifying that only call details, not their contents, were obtained to investigate Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Read More
NYT: “Who’s Gonna Stop You?” Listen to Trump Call Pressing Georgia Speaker to Overturn 2020 Election Results is a chilling reminder of the lengths to which a former president was willing to go to cling to power. The article, and the underlying phone call it highlights, paints a clear picture of an individual actively attempting to subvert the democratic process. The phrase “Who’s gonna stop you?” uttered by Trump, encapsulates the arrogance and brazenness of his actions. It’s a statement that reflects a complete disregard for the rule of law and the established norms of American governance.
The fact that this phone call occurred, and that it involved pressuring a state official to overturn election results, is not just a political misstep; it’s a direct assault on the foundations of democracy.… Continue reading
Germany has accused Russia of launching a cyber-attack on air traffic control in August 2024, attributing the incident to the Russian military intelligence service and the Fancy Bear hacker group. Furthermore, Germany alleges that Russia attempted to influence and destabilize the country’s recent federal election through a disinformation campaign. The German government has vowed to implement countermeasures in collaboration with its European partners. Russia has denied these accusations, calling them baseless and absurd, reflecting the continued strain in relations between the two countries.
Read More
The final criminal case related to Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results has been dismissed five years after the fact, meaning Trump will face no criminal trial. The dismissal of Georgia’s racketeering case, combined with the abandonment of federal election-interference charges due to presidential immunity, has effectively closed all avenues for holding Trump criminally liable. These decisions were made despite detailed allegations and strong evidence of wrongdoing, leading to questions about accountability and the limits of the legal system. This outcome leaves voters to determine consequences, while also raising questions about the precedent set by these dismissals.
Read More
Tennessee Democrats are investigating reports of postcards circulating with an incorrect election date for the special election between Aftyn Behn and Matt Van Epps in the 7th Congressional District. The mailers, which lack attribution, reportedly direct voters to cast their ballots on December 3rd, a day after the actual election. This race has garnered significant attention, with the outcome potentially impacting the balance of power in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a narrow majority. Turnout levels, particularly in the district’s rural areas and Democratic-leaning Nashville, are expected to play a crucial role in determining the election’s outcome.
Read More
In a controversial decision, a Georgia prosecutor dropped criminal charges against Donald Trump regarding his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. This move, seen as detrimental to the rule of law, came after the case against Trump faced setbacks due to alleged ethical violations involving the original prosecutor. The dismissal of the case, supported by a 22-page filing, effectively dismissed a wealth of evidence that could have painted a dark picture of Trump’s egregious conduct, and it offered alternative interpretations of Trump’s actions. Rather than allowing a jury to decide on the interpretations, the prosecutor whitewashed history, denying a jury of its right to decide on Trump’s actions in 2020.
Read More
New prosecutor chosen in Georgia 2020 election interference case against Trump, others. This whole situation feels like a movie, doesn’t it? The saga of the Georgia election interference case, involving Donald Trump and others, has taken another turn. The news is that a new prosecutor has been chosen, and the reaction, well, it’s mixed, to say the least.
The initial reaction seems to be a deep-seated skepticism, almost resignation. There’s a prevailing sense that the system is rigged, that the powerful will always find a way to escape accountability. The fact that the new prosecutor, Pete Skandalakis, named himself to the position after leading the search isn’t exactly inspiring confidence.… Continue reading
The Georgia racketeering case against Donald Trump and his allies will now be overseen by Peter Skandalakis, director of the Prosecuting Attorney’s Council of Georgia, after several other prosecutors declined to take on the case. Originally launched by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, the case faced legal challenges that led to Willis’s removal. Skandalakis received the investigative file and is reviewing it, with a status conference scheduled for December 1. While a former U.S. attorney is skeptical the case will proceed, Trump’s defense maintains his innocence and confidence in a dismissal.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker