President Trump’s claims of election fraud extend to his belief that millions of noncitizens vote, leading to demands for new voting restrictions. His recent assertion that a phone call to federal prosecutors in California changed primary election results, allowing a preferred candidate to advance, suggests a misunderstanding of how mail ballots are counted. In California, a significant portion of votes are cast by mail and tabulated over time, with early results often skewing differently than later counts due to voter habits. The article explains these shifts are normal and do not indicate fraud, but rather the complex, multi-stage process of vote tabulation.
Read More
Campaign finance records reveal that Mike Lindell’s gubernatorial campaign has allocated a significant portion of its funds, over half of the approximately $356,000 raised, to purchasing his own self-published book, “What Are the Odds?”. These book purchases, totaling around $187,000, were made to Lindell’s for-profit company and represent an unusual campaign expense compared to other candidates. This spending has drawn criticism and legal scrutiny, particularly in light of ongoing legal battles related to election fraud claims and outstanding legal fees.
Read More
The lower chamber leader has attempted to discredit the “No Kings” protests, falsely claiming the movement, which saw the largest single-day protest in U.S. history, advocated violence. These protests primarily focused on First Amendment rights, opposing Trump’s agenda and advocating for democratic principles. Participants used their platform to address various issues, including ICE’s authority and universal healthcare. Simultaneously, the leader seems intent on keeping the government closed, refusing to negotiate funding and blaming Democrats for the situation.
Read More
Oklahoma’s new social studies standards, championed by Superintendent Ryan Walters, include a section instructing students to identify “discrepancies” in the 2020 election results, echoing unsubstantiated claims of widespread fraud. This decision followed the state Senate’s refusal to reject the language, despite concerns from three new board members regarding Walters’ lack of transparency in the process and late changes made without their knowledge or public input. Walters, however, defended the standards as “unapologetically conservative” and “pro-America,” while critics condemned them as partisan and age-inappropriate. The controversy highlights a broader clash over the role of political ideology in public education.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker