The NTSB’s reliance on Elon Musk’s X platform for news updates is deeply troubling. This situation raises serious concerns about the potential for censorship, manipulation, and a blatant disregard for transparency in government operations. The fact that an agency responsible for investigating transportation accidents is now constrained to using a platform owned by a private individual with known political leanings is alarming.
This development effectively places a significant constraint on the NTSB’s ability to communicate directly with the public. Any information released will be subject to the whims of the platform’s owner, raising the specter of information being filtered, delayed, or even suppressed entirely.… Continue reading
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has ceased using X, citing that the platform no longer meets its communication needs, and will now utilize Bluesky. This decision follows the European Commission’s investigation into X’s compliance with EU social media regulations, specifically regarding algorithms and content moderation. The EMA will maintain its X account to prevent impersonation and monitor public health discussions. The agency’s departure is one among many, with numerous organizations and universities also abandoning the platform due to concerns over its management.
Read More
Elon Musk’s speech at Donald Trump’s inauguration has been edited to remove a gesture that resembled a Nazi salute. The altered video, posted on X, omits the hand motion that occurred twice during his remarks praising Trump’s Mars colonization plans. The unedited footage, widely circulated online and shown on major news networks, sparked considerable controversy and speculation regarding Musk’s intentions. Musk himself has not commented on the alteration.
Read More
Elon Musk’s recent request for more “positive” content on X was met with widespread criticism, with users labeling him a hypocrite for his own inflammatory posts. These posts include endorsing the far-right AfD party in Germany and using profanity towards critics. Musk’s actions contrast sharply with his demand, particularly given analysis suggesting he artificially boosted pro-Trump content on the platform. This controversy highlights the ongoing tension between Musk’s stated goals for X and his actual actions on the platform.
Read More
House Republicans proposed a draft agreement including $2.5 trillion in mandatory spending cuts to raise the debt ceiling by $1.5 trillion. This plan, revealed in a closed-door meeting, targets programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, despite legal limitations on directly cutting Social Security through the proposed reconciliation process. Critics argue these cuts are intended to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, with the only way to meet the proposed spending reductions being drastic cuts to major social programs. The plan underscores concerns about prioritizing tax cuts for corporations and billionaires over vital social safety nets.
Read More
Congressional Republicans, influenced by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are prioritizing massive tax cuts for the wealthy, funded by drastic cuts to social programs. This plan, mirroring past failed attempts, relies on unsubstantiated claims of efficiency improvements and ignores readily available avenues for genuine cost savings. The proposed cuts disproportionately target programs like Medicare and Social Security, despite public support for alternative solutions like increased taxes on the wealthy. Ultimately, DOGE serves as a political cover for budget slashing and dismantling social safety nets.
Read More
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, while promising middle-class benefits, disproportionately favored corporations and high-income earners, increasing the national deficit by $1.9 trillion. The cuts exacerbated existing racial and income inequalities, with Black taxpayers paying higher taxes than similarly situated white taxpayers due to factors like lower homeownership rates. This was achieved through tax advantages biased towards homeownership and stock ownership, areas where Black Americans are historically disadvantaged. Furthermore, the repeal of the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act led to a disproportionate drop in health insurance coverage among low-income individuals, particularly Black Americans.
Read More
Musk floods X with spending bill misinformation. It’s not just misinformation; it’s deliberate disinformation, a calculated spreading of falsehoods designed to cause harm and mislead the public. The intent is clear: Musk is knowingly disseminating false narratives. This isn’t a case of accidental inaccuracy; it’s a conscious choice to manipulate public opinion.
Musk’s motivations are complex and likely multifaceted. Some speculate his actions stem from resentment over the Twitter (now X) acquisition, a deal he may feel was overpriced and forced upon him by the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission. This perspective suggests a scorched-earth approach, using the platform to inflict damage as a form of retaliation.… Continue reading
Following the November election, Republicans secured control of both the House and Senate, giving them the power to shape the national agenda. Despite campaigning on issues like inflation and immigration, congressional Republicans are prioritizing cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, potentially saving hundreds of billions of dollars. This plan, however, contradicts their campaign promises and would disproportionately harm seniors and working-class Americans while potentially benefiting the wealthy through further tax cuts. Republicans’ narrow five-seat majority in the House, further reduced by Trump’s cabinet appointments, makes passing their agenda highly precarious.
Read More
In response to Elon Musk’s transformation of X into a platform for disinformation and propaganda, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), representing over 295,000 journalists, will cease publishing content on the platform starting January 20, 2025. This decision, mirroring actions by other European news outlets, cites concerns about Musk’s collaboration with Donald Trump and the platform’s promotion of harmful content. The EFJ emphasizes its commitment to press freedom and ethical journalism in making this choice. This action reflects the growing concerns about the erosion of public trust in social media platforms and the threat to democratic discourse.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker